privatebydesign said:AvTvM said:Marsu42 said:Are you sure Canon is the best brand for youWPJ said:But I don't need a 500$ remote.?
I assumed you already have a rt system, thus the trigger cost actually is zero because it's built-in.
Yep, that's just another blatant example of marketing crippling by canon. 600ex-rt can remote trigger cameras, ST-E3-RT cannot.
Proof? The yongnuo ST-E3 apparently works as remote trigger.
http://flashhavoc.com/yongnuo-yn-e3-rt-features/Remote shutter release, Linked Shot (Need extra shutter cable for cameras released before 2012)
No I think you have it wrong, the YN-E3-RT and ST-E3-RT can both be used as a receiver for remote shooting, but you can't use either as a trigger, that is certainly how the ST-E3-RT works, you need to use a 600 as the trigger, though another 600 can also be a receiver. The ST-E3-RT does not have the REL (release) option on the menu 2 scrolled interface, I expect the YN to be the same.
You need the cable to trigger pre 2012 cameras as they can't be triggered via the hotshoe,, just like the ST, ergo it seems the YN is the same as the ST.
If you want a remote release (that's also a very nice intervalometer) just spend $80 and get one of these:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005GMVGGE/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Why in the world someone would bother 'burning' the use of a 600RT that is $$$ for a simple remote shutter release, etc is beyond me.
HTH,
cayenne
Upvote
0