"Your camera takes great photos" and other peeves

chauncey said:
Is your ego that shallow that you concern yourself with comments like "Gee, your camera sure does take good pictures". A little analysis might do wonders for that shallow ego. ::)
Dear doctor Phil, we are shallow people who hang around in a gearcentric forum (called Canon Rumors) but we don't like when people compliment our gear.
 
Upvote 0
sanj said:
cid said:
Zv said:
I have a 60D and shoot on full auto = I'm a twat (cos some things never change!)

at least I don't shoot on full auto ::) ;D

Shooting mode is irrelevant. The end result is.

But shooting on full auto and refusing to learn any other modes AND calling yourself a photographer is what I was referring to. The post was a reply to the "do you think either deserve to call themselves photographers?". Just my way of saying hell no!

Now, if they can use full auto as well as other modes to create stunning images then yes I would say that person could be called a photographer.

You gotta know the limitations of your equipment and be able to push yourself and be creative. That person Roo was talking about sounds like the opposite of that.
 
Upvote 0
I didn't realize what a rager this thread would become, but I love it! I'll note for the record that I consider the "gear credit" to be a minor annoyance. It's not something that is going to shake me up. I wouldn't even say it makes me angry.

Tangent #1: My mother in law takes great photos with a Rebel XS, kit lens, on full auto. Not suitable for huge hi-res prints, but beautifully framed, wonderful shots. My cousin takes spectacular photos with a fairly cheap P&S. She's been hired to do portraits based on the strength of her images and been greeted with confused frowns when she pulls the camera out of her purse. She's been wanting a Canon DSLR for awhile and look out when she gets one. The point is, gear is cool and can do awesome things, but credit the photographer too!

Tangent #2: My other hobby/passion is competitive long distance running. Believe me, average Joe on the street doesn't understand that any more than he understands photography. It is a world most people simply cannot understand. Keeping this in mind, I try not to get annoyed with people who say or think my training is excessive, unhealthy, obsessive/compulsive, pointless, vain, etc. All the same, other runners and I will gripe about it because it's a common experience among us.
 
Upvote 0
iron-t said:
I didn't realize what a rager this thread would become, but I love it! I'll note for the record that I consider the "gear credit" to be a minor annoyance. It's not something that is going to shake me up. I wouldn't even say it makes me angry.

Tangent #1: My mother in law takes great photos with a Rebel XS, kit lens, on full auto. Not suitable for huge hi-res prints, but beautifully framed, wonderful shots. My cousin takes spectacular photos with a fairly cheap P&S. She's been hired to do portraits based on the strength of her images and been greeted with confused frowns when she pulls the camera out of her purse. She's been wanting a Canon DSLR for awhile and look out when she gets one. The point is, gear is cool and can do awesome things, but credit the photographer too!

Tangent #2: My other hobby/passion is competitive long distance running. Believe me, average Joe on the street doesn't understand that any more than he understands photography. It is a world most people simply cannot understand. Keeping this in mind, I try not to get annoyed with people who say or think my training is excessive, unhealthy, obsessive/compulsive, pointless, vain, etc. All the same, other runners and I will gripe about it because it's a common experience among us.

Some good points there. I guess when I think about it I bought a DSLR because I wanted to take better pictures. I could have bought a point and shoot and learnt that way. Does your cousin have a website? Or flickr? I'd like to see the pictures.
 
Upvote 0
It's never bothered me if people notice my camera, find it interesting, and mention it. Since the venue I shoot in a lot is large and I need close-ups and head and guitar shots, the 70-200mm f/2.8L zoom is on my camera most of the time. It's large. The camera doesn't get their attention -- the lens does, and people think it's a permanent part of the camera and say "That's a nice camera!" and compliment me on the pictures (sometimes me and sometimes the camera). They just assume that a bigger lens and better camera are going to take better pictures. Most people wouldn't know a 5D3 from a T2i unless they have some knowledge about cameras. Most people just find it something to start a conversation about and that's preferable to not saying anything. I prefer the friendliness and willingness to start a conversation. I don't consider myself a professional photographer and don't want to be "that photographer" who gets upset about things of this nature. Nothing is more of a turnoff than getting jumped on for saying something the wrong way in an attempt to talk to or be friendly to a photographer. There is no sense in getting upset with people for saying things about something they don't understand.
 
Upvote 0
Zv said:
But shooting on full auto and refusing to learn any other modes AND calling yourself a photographer is what I was referring to. The post was a reply to the "do you think either deserve to call themselves photographers?". Just my way of saying hell no!

Now, if they can use full auto as well as other modes to create stunning images then yes I would say that person could be called a photographer.

You gotta know the limitations of your equipment and be able to push yourself and be creative. That person Roo was talking about sounds like the opposite of that.

Sorry, but I can't resist posting this link about...how to be a Professional Photographer:

MWAC Attack-Episode 1: The Camera

I get tickled every time I watch this..or the ones that follow in her series....
 
Upvote 0
cayenne said:
I get tickled every time I watch this..
OMG! :o :o :o :o ... I am shocked for 2 reasons:
1. Everything about that video
2. That you say "every time I watch this" ... how many times did you watch !t? more importatnly, why on God green earth are you watching it more than once? :o
Lord forgive me, I have sinned by losing almost 4 minutes of my life that I can never get back!
 
Upvote 0
paul13walnut5 said:
A thought crossed my mind. Maybe these folk asking about your camera aren't really all that interested, a bit like the weather, they are making small talk because its a polite thing to do. A few responses on the autistic spectrum here.

Ding! We have a winner!

When people try to start a conversation with a stranger, it is easier to focus the initial conversation on something that is not personal.
 
Upvote 0
Rienzphotoz said:
cayenne said:
I get tickled every time I watch this..
OMG! :o :o :o :o ... I am shocked for 2 reasons:
1. Everything about that video
2. That you say "every time I watch this" ... how many times did you watch !t? more importatnly, why on God green earth are you watching it more than once? :o
Lord forgive me, I have sinned by losing almost 4 minutes of my life that I can never get back!

You mean you watched it right through to the end ?! ???
 
Upvote 0
cayenne said:
Sorry, but I can't resist posting this link about...how to be a Professional Photographer:

MWAC Attack-Episode 1: The Camera

I get tickled every time I watch this..or the ones that follow in her series....

She is fantastic! I had the same experience watching FOX NEWS for the first time, I couldn't work out if it was a very subtle satire or for real and there were idiots who really thought that way. When I got to episode 15 about GOD, I was in no doubt that like FOX NEWS, it was a clever satire.
 
Upvote 0
Sporgon said:
Rienzphotoz said:
cayenne said:
I get tickled every time I watch this..
OMG! :o :o :o :o ... I am shocked for 2 reasons:
1. Everything about that video
2. That you say "every time I watch this" ... how many times did you watch !t? more importatnly, why on God green earth are you watching it more than once? :o
Lord forgive me, I have sinned by losing almost 4 minutes of my life that I can never get back!

You mean you watched it right through to the end ?! ???
How did you ever come across this????? Never mind, I don't want to know.
 
Upvote 0
AcutancePhotography said:
How to irritate a Photographer... YA BASTARDS!

Evidently I have been annoying "photographers" for many years. My annoying "photographers" does not bother me so much, it is just that I was annoying them unintentionally.

I wonder how many of us annoy people with other interests with our vapid complementary conversation starters?

Don't know about his captures, but I'd never tire of slamming a hot iron into his face.
 
Upvote 0