Quick Post
I'm just travelling around a bit at the moment and I'm unable to format or research these patents thoroughly. I'm sure some of you will tear it apart. A better translation would be appreciated.

This Japanese site has posted some Canon patents he/she has found.

This is a direct email quote
Based on his investigation Canon made following patents.

EF300/F4 IS II with plastic lens.
http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2009-12-17

300f41 - Lens Patents
EF 300 f/4L IS II

This would be a welcomed lens by many.

EF70-210/F4 IS II with plastic lens
http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2009-12-12

70210 - Lens Patents
EF 70-200 f/4L IS II

Not sure this lens needs an update yet.

EF300/F2.8 DO IS and EF 400/F4 DO IS with new double DO and IS
http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2009-12-02

30028DO - Lens Patents
EF 300 f/2.8DO IS

A lot of DO patents popping up. A lot of people ask for smaller and lighter lenses.

EF 15-24/F3.5-4.5 Fish eye zoom (not EF-S)
http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2009-11-27

fisheye - Lens Patents
EF 15-24 f/3.5-4.5 Fisheye

I think this would be a great fisheye solution. It wouldn't cost a lot at first sight.

CR's Take
All make some sense outside of a new 70-200 f/4L IS.

View more lens patents here

Thanks Mitsu

cr

Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
Share.

48 Comments

  1. My guess would be DO cost is a combination of low manufacturing quantity and the premium Canon can charge for its benefits. Both should subside as it becomes more commonplace (but the latter won’t really go away if Canon has the technology cornered in some way.)

  2. Except the 70-200 f/4 is already one of the best lenses in Canon’s lineup in its ability to resolve detail. My bet would be that (if it ever is actually produced) the 70-210 f/4 will be either a cost reduction move in one of Canon’s most popular lenses or a non-L aiming at a different market segment.

    The so-called diffraction limit is a direct physical consequence of the aperture size. Unless we bring up exotica like meta-material “apertures”, there’s absolutely nothing any lens design can do about it.

  3. I took a look at the source post, it is indeed plastic lenses. The main downside (according to the source) is that plastic lens performance can vary with temperature, and therefore the patents use two different types of plastic to cancel out the effects (highlighted in purple and green in the pics.)

Leave A Reply