Canon News has uncovered a patent for an APS-C 100-400mm F5.6-7.1 optical formula. (Richard also messed it up by not noticing it was APS-C at first)
Does this mean that the EOS-M is getting a super telephoto consumer lens? The optical elements are fairly lightweight and the lens optics diameter would be somewhere around 52mm, which seems to fit with the EOS-M ecosystem. Or is this a sign of an RF APS-C camera coming out. The need for an APS-C 100-400 is puzzling if it's for the RF mount though.
Canon RF/EF-M 100-400mm f/5.6-7.1:
- Focal length: 119.97mm 218.00mm 360.96mm
- F-Number: 5.50 6.50 7.10
- Half angle of view: 6.50° 3.59° 2.17°
- Image height: 13.66mm 13.66mm 13.66mm
- Total lens length: 179.62mm 192.93mm 233.56mm
- BF: 15.03mm 15.03mm 15.04mm
Canon appears to be going a different direction with their longer lenses for their mirrorless mounts than the other manufacturers. They seem to be more interested in reducing the size and making the usability more comfortable. It also helps that they have a bunch of stellar EF lenses that will work just fine with your mirrorless cameras if you want the faster speeds.
Also not a fan of calling it a 100-400mm if it's really just a 3X zoom at 120-360mm. But maybe they'll be a bit more honest in the actual name, this is just a patent after all.
*Edit: Note that 360 mm / 7.1 = 51 mm, so less than Canon's standard diameter for EF-M lenses. So it would fit in that system, even though f/7.1 on APS-C is still quite rough.
That f/7.1 aperture report also makes one wonder if some of the details about a prospective 100-500 lens are getting mixed up with this thing.
And the RF 100-500 mm is something Canon officially announced. I'm not sure if I understood that correctly, but it sounded like you implied that the f/7.1 aperture in that lens could be misinformation. It is not.
My addendum;
It totally skipped by me that this is an APS-C lens because the image height is 13.66mm.
This is kind of an odd duck patent application either meant for the RF mount or the EOS-M mount. It seems unlikely it would for the EOS-M mount considering they seem to be diameter constrained at 61mm in diameter. However, technically a F7.1 400mm would have around a 55mm front element, so it's possible that this is for the EOS-M mount, but I think it's highly unlikely the lens body could be made that small.
Good point! This must be an EF-M design. If I had to guess I'd say that this is a byproduct patent of the RF 100–500 design work, but I haven't checked whether the designs are even remotely similar. 360mm f/7.1 wouldn't be totally bad if it's sharp at max aperture.
I guess what would be could about it is that (subtracting the flange) at ~ 160 mm physical length it is just 50 mm longer than my EF-S 55-250 mm IS STM. And that lens is lovely compact and affordable for what it does.
Thank you canon confusing me even more about what to do next :p
So M5ii must be coming , and M barrel diameter isnt unbreakable law.
There isnt IS so M5ii got ibis?
Guys i would love to see your face if next M camera would be M1 :p would make some :O
It even makes sense ,camera for professional bird shooters