We are updating our previous Canon EOS R5 Mark II specifications. Some of those things were slightly incorrect, and we can add some context, but have to be a bit vague and not divulge exact claimed numbers.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II Specifications (Rumored)
- 45mp BSI Stacked Sensor (Long standing rumor)
- A preburst feature superior to that found in the EOS R6 Mark II.
- Both Mechanical and Electronic Shutter
- 12fps Mechanical & 30fps Electronic
- Certain ergonomic design features from the Canon EOS R6 Mark II are expected to be incorporated into the EOS R5 Mark II, with the video/stills toggle being a notable and obvious inclusion.
- No Smart Controller (updated, our bad)
- There will be Eye Controlled AF (Slight correction from the previous post)
- Advancements in heat dissipation technology have led to enhanced performance in video recording and high-frame-rate photography.
- You can look at this patent breakdown from last week, some of the things listed there are coming. Just pay attention the the body type in the patent drawings.
- We hope you like right angles
We have talked many times about July events planned for people at Canon in New York City. That's still a go and will remain as such.
The 30fps is a slight let down, I really hoped it would beat the 40fps my R8 can do. But 30fps at 14-bit would still be a massive improvement over the R5!
Claimed readout can differ a bit from real world. I do see at CineD they sometimes have different numbers than other places.... but whatever... It's a lot faster.
Too bad about the R3 controllers, I would gladly take those over eye AF
While I was wishing they would remove the mechanical shutter, the “traditional” 12fps shutter from the previous R5 sounds realistic to me. Like I said before, it didn’t make sense to me that Canon would invest in further developing the mechanical shutter in this day and age.
Sounds like a very solid camera, similar to the Sony a1, but certainly with improvements.
At least it\'ll have the new hotshoe and the EL5 should have the cycle time to handle use as fill flash with high speed sync.
Guessing that right angle tease has something to do with the EVF?
Either that or Canon is going retro-blocky style.
Can they add 16 bit this time?
CineD measures it in video, for photography the situation is different. For example, the R6 can do around 19 ms in photography (with the full 3:2 readout), while only 30 ms (with a 16:9 crop) in video. We have examples like that with stacked cameras too, as both the Z9 and a1 have under 5 ms in photo, but around 15 ms in video, R3 around 5.5 ms in photo and around 10 ms in video if my memory serves me right. I would believe (but that's total guess) that they "underclock" the sensor in video mode due to heat dissipation because the sensor has to run a much longer time than while doing short photo bursts.
Otherwise what's the point of the R3 beyond massive battery size and ergonomics?
The R5 II will probably do to the R3 what the A9 III did to the previous gen of A9 II.
It is not impossible.