I recall back to the film days and using the glorious little 55 and 56mm primes. Hardly anyone makes them anymore which I think is a sad state of affairs. Needless to say, this patent application got me a bit intrigued for that very reason. While Canon certainly made 55mm back in the FD days, they haven't made an EF (or RF) lens of that focal length.
Canon's embodiments in this patent application are 56mm F1.2 primes based upon the double Gauss element arrangement. The back focus distance is what Canon is attempting to lower with this patent application and it's around 30mm for the embodiments which is certainly suitable for an RF-mounted lens. The lens itself would be fairly compact, being around 60mm in length.
Canon RF 56mm F1.2
Focus Distance 56.00 F number 1.24 Half angle of view (°) 21.12 Image height 21.64 Lens total length 79.92 BF 30.00
As with all of Canon's patent applications, this patent application may not become an actual product or even a patent. What it does is give us a clue to what Canon has been researching.
Source: Japan Patent Office: 2023-127280
In a patent, ‘image height’ is the radius of the image circle, i.e., half of the diagonal of the sensor. It’s not the vertical dimension of the sensor. 2 x 21.64 mm = 43.28 mm, and the diagonal of a FF sensor is 43.2 mm.
Some Canon patents for wide angle lenses have an image height of a bit less than FF coverage, because with distortion correction applied the image will fill the frame. CR or their source(s) have sometimes erroneously called those APS-C lenses.
For a better explanation, see this graphic below.
Patent: Optical formulas for a trio of wide f/1.8 prime lenses for the RF-S mount
Here's another, in this case the one 'RF-S' lenses exemplified in the patent is actually the real RF 16/2.8 STM lens that had already been on the market for several months.
Patent: Canon RF APS-C pancake prime lens optical formulas
Just to frustrate you, they're not just doing it for FF lenses. For example, the recent patent for an RF-S 15-70/4:
yeah wasn't me ;)
Reading through translated patent applications is horrid stuff, especially when you are reading 20+ in one go, things can get missed like that.
With a 18mm to 20mm image circle that's certainly not APS-C. interesting designs, but I hate them personally.
and yes, Canon loves to troll me by stretching wide angles for APS-C and full frame in patent applications
But then again. m43's have made that into an art form, so i guess we should blame them for starting it all.
That can only mean... it's retro time!