• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Advice for upcoming portrait shoot

vuilang said:
shoot tight: head & shoulder (use 70-200).. use couple angle from top down (get a ladder).

Agree.

Camera angle is important; make sure the camera is a few inches above her nose, nostrils are not attractive and this makes your subject look up at the lens, which is more appealing. This type of angle will also help thin out their face slightly.
Upvote 0

Tripod - Help

DB said:
I have the Manfrotto 055XPROB tripod + the rubber/spikes optional feet + 701HDV fluid video head and they work great with my gripped 7D, plus I shoot mostly video too. I paid roughly $150 for the tripod legs + $30 for the Spikes + $120 for the fluid head, so approx $300 in total (except I purchased in the UK for < £200).

I'd highly recommend the fluid video head for 2 reasons: (1) great for panning up/down or left/right really slowly and smoothly for HD video work (and I mean S-L-O-W-L-Y), plus (2) the video head is great for still photography too (if you want to shoot portrait - then use the 90-degree shift in the 055XPROB stem instead) - just as good as a ball-head.

Ditto this. If you're doing video, you absolutely DO NOT want a ball head. Ball heads are great for photography, but for video they're useless unless you never want the camera to move. Get a decent fluid head like the 701HDV and you'll never be sorry.
Upvote 0

5D3 + 24-70 f2.8 II + FoCal

TotoEC said:
rpt said:
Funkmobile said:
Did you cover over the viewfinder the entire time?
Yes, that is the third thing I did when I got consistent results. I forgot about it when I posted earlier...

All the time while the test was conducted, except when acquiring the target after moving from 25x or 50x the focal distance, or when I tested it at 5' and 10' prefered shooting distance for portrait.
Ok. So you could try this:
Set the MA values for Wide and Telephoto as suggested by FoCal. Then take a set of pictures each at 24mm, 50mm and 70mm. Each set would consist of two photos. Both taken of the same target at the same distance. One imaged thru the viewfinder and the other imaged with live view. You may change the distance of the target for the three focal lengths. If the pair looks equally in focus, that MA setting is good. If not, it is not. If both extremes are good and the 50 is not I think you should replace the lens. If one of the extremes is good and the other two are bad, you need to run FoCal again and then repeat this test.

My 100-400L is in the shop and when it comes back I am going to run this exact test on it. Hope this helps.
Upvote 0

50 mm Can't make up my mind!

Caveat: I have never used a Sigma 50 f/1.4, so I can't say anything about it. I do use the Canon 50mm F/1.4, though, and it suits my needs just fine. I've had to learn a few things about it through trial and error, and so will anybody who uses it for any length of time. Although many beginners start out with it (it's a cheap-ish prime with excellent IQ), many of them also get frustrated with it because of it's finnicky nature. Learn how it autofocuses. Know that sharpness is ok-but-not-great at f/1.4, but gets really, really good when you get into the f/2-f/8 range. Microadjust if you have the ability to, and learn how it responds to you and your camera body. Once you do that, I think you won't want another 50 (unless it's the 50L, of course). It's by far the lens that I own that has the biggest bang-for-the-buck value, and I own two L lenses.
Upvote 0

Why you should take your camera to family Weddings

DCM1024 said:
DB said:
PackLight said:
Daniel Flather said:
What did this guy do when it was 36 exposures a roll?

He probably never shot film.
With the new Canon DSLR's you can set your camera to P "pro" mode and go right to work with little or no experience.

P = Program Mode on Canon DSLR cameras. The P for Professional is an urban myth. Just read the manual.

Um - I'm pretty sure the P = Pro comment was intended to be sarcastic.

Sure, but perpetuates a myth that it is. Google it - you'll be surprised that 80%+ still believe that it stands for Pro. That's the problem with misinformation, it becomes a double hermeneutic.

edit: sarcasm works only when everyone knows it is sarcasm, people come to CR for factual info, when they see a comment like that, many will assume it to be true, because most do not bother to read their manuals, thus they see a throw away line and believe it - they then tell their friends and others that P is the Professional mode and word of mouth does the rest - hence it becomes a misinformed self-fulfilling prophecy and hence most people tell others on blogs etc. (see Google for instance). What starts out as a sarcastic line becomes regurgitated fact...unfortunately.
Upvote 0

Europe trip, 1-2 months

Your opening statement mentioned you were interested in everything, including zoos (which is my particular photo interest). If you like cats, the best wild cat facility in the world by far is Le Parc Des Felins in Nesle, France. It is about an hour east of Paris. They have 26 species of cats (plus numerous subspecies) in huge natural enclosures. The lion and tiger exhibits (of which there are multiple) are between 1-2 acres each.

The best zoo in England, if you happen to be in the area, is Chester Zoo. The town of Chester is also somewhat photogenic and has an ancient Roman wall that you can walk along.

I have not been to Berlin Zoo, but it is reported to have the most diverse animal collection in the world (although quality of enclosures seems to not be top notch).
Upvote 0

AI Focus tracking issue, or user error?

Kernuak said:
There are other justfications for the 135 f/2. The wider aperture will be better for indoor sports and it also makes a useful landscape lens for longer viewpoints (although you do already have a 70-200). Also, if you're tracking sideways, the 5D MkII will cope better, as the focal distance won't change so quickly.

Excellent. I'll clip this out and show it to the wife. Her son also plays basketball and will be featured more in that sport. It's imperative that we get the appropriate glass to use in a fast-moving sport that takes place in a dimly lit gym.
Upvote 0

Upgrading from sony to canon

preppyak said:
drjlo said:
Ironically, I have been thinking Sony is looking better and better, especially with the finally-NEX-I-can-live-with NEX6 and A99. Sony is bound to release a scaled-down full frame body to compete with 6D and D600, and the price is likely going to be much nicer.
And they still have weak lens selection for both lineups. The NEX line barely has 10 lenses, and that says nothing of whether they are any good. Same is true of A-mount, especially if we are talking for full-frame; the cheap primes just really aren't there. You have to go third-party in many cases.

Although they did have nice cheap crop primes, a £120 RRP 35mm 1.8 and a £100 RRp 50mm 1.8 but only worked on crop were loverly lenses although they were extremely plasticity and had terrible polygonal apertures :s
Upvote 0

Bring 120-300 OS or buy 55-250mm ?

I've travelled with both the 55-250 and the Sigma 100-300 f4. I now take just the 55-250. Why?

- Gaining 55-99 is more valuable than the relatively subtle difference between 250-300, even with a standard zoom - particularly when with others one doesn't always want to change lenses.
- Weight
- Size
- Weight again
- 55-250 IQ is absolutely adequate
- Rarely needed the f4 of the 100-300
- IS on the 55-250 was useful
- 58mm circular polarisers are cheaper
- Weight and size again

Hope that helps.
Upvote 0

Is 22Mpx Really Enough?!!!

While higher DR is good, and Nikon is clearly better than Canon at this, Canon's DR is still very good. For me noise is a bigger issue for ruining digial photos. I will aways be happy to have more MP in a new sensor as long as the noise is the same or better that current sensors. PC's are also getting more powerful, a HP Z820 can have dual Xeon CPU's with 512GB Quad Channel Ram and can have a high end Quadro and Tesla cards (NVIDIA Maximus) that are
supported by LR4 and CS6. Quadro and Tesla slam GeForce, Radeon and FirePro with Adobe solutions at the moment. The only issue is the cost of such a system.
Upvote 0

Make my own 600-RT gels or wait?

I came here to post the same question as the OP, so thought I'd bump and see if anything has changed in the past 5 months and maybe there are some 3rd party filters available now?

Failing that I can cut my own but does anyone have ideas on a fluorescent correction filter kit and a place to buy one that ships internationally? Just looking at a few places locally (Australia) they only seem to stock the 'artistic' filters.
Upvote 0

looking for equivalent to efs 17-55 f/2.8 in EF line

Ryan708 said:
Z said:
The 24-105 f/4.

At a glance the f/4 figure will seem like a downgrade from the f/2.8 of the 17-55, but the short answer is the full frame sensor will more than compensate for the smaller max aperture.

Neuro will probably be along in a mo to explain exactly why. The technical details escape me ;)

Haha, good call. Neuro's thoughts are exactly why I want to move to FF. I want an L class standard lens with IS, and an L class ultrawide, thats not too horrible on distortion. Thinking of 17-40 (when not an UWA will be a standard on 60d backup) and a 24-105L. Waiting on some reviews of the 6d before I choose a body. Id love a 5DMkIII but that won't be happening :-/
I would go with a 5D II over the 6D. It's cheaper and still an excellent camera.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB