GODOX Propac PB820

Mt Spokane Photography said:
I use Sanyo eneloop. They will last 3 years and still keep most of their charge. If you have Sanyo NiMH, they will retain a good charge for about 6 months.
If your batteries discharge in a week, something is drastically wrong. If they are left in a piece of equipment, its probably defective.
Ordinary rechargables all ended up in my junk bin over two years ago.

http://www.eneloop.info/home/performance-details/self-discharge.html

I used to sell the Eneloop's at my old store, but they looked and were cheaper than the 2700's from Sanyo. Anyway, they are history as I bought myself two packs of the Godox. No more charging 6 rounds of AA's :D
Upvote 0

Survival of the fittest/luckiest

Bosman said:
Rapid strap. Happened to me, never used it once i got the spiderpro holster.

I won't buy a single spider pro item again. I had my Pentax 645D on a spider pro sling - the most expensive one, and twice it detached from my camera once into my hands on the edge of a 200 foot cliff and the other time not into my hands but a very hard floor in Brussels airport. That spider pro sling cost me a repair of £875 (about $1400). Pentax originally wanted to replace the whole outside of the camera which would have cost £1600 ($2600) including fixing buttons and the cable release socket.

I have used the Black Rapid with absolutely no issues whatsoever.
Upvote 0

Speeding up 1DX foc lock... Any tips?

nightbreath said:
Sycotek said:
I gave them a month and a half - I'm already pricing up my Nikon kit (I'm not going back to a 5D2 setup) - It's unfortunate as I have shot Canon exclusively but I can't afford to have a lowlight camera/system that cant focus...
And you'll have another kind of issues with Nikon :)
I believe if a camera doesn't work for you, it's a reason to improve your workflow first, and just then think about jumping to the other side.

Oh I most certainly will ! No Question - but it's a lesser of 2 evils. I can handle a camera that's a little green - I can't handle a camera that doesn't focus in a reception hall, if Your income is based on you not missing moments then You have to make a decision. As stated originally a 7D and 5D2 kill the 1DX in lowlight - and I have been more then patient with Canon. The 1DX is meant to last me 3 years but I can't work with a camera this slow. Under normal circumstances - fixing workflow would be adding af assist which only makes it slower...

I have tried but its obvious there wont be an immediate fix.
Upvote 0

24mm F/1.4 II vs new 24mm F/2.8 IS

So anyone actually owned both and compared them at f/4-f/10, for more landscape type apertures on a FF?

The 24 1.4 II, I know from personal experience, is totally crisp to the edges well stopped down on a 5D2 while say a 24-105L simply is not (the whole all lenses are the same at f/8 is an absolute, utter myth), so what about the new 24 2.8 IS??

I suppose the upcoming 24-70 II might be more flexible than either though.
Upvote 0

7d - max ISO issues

Regarding the Max ISO setting. As I understand how this is generally implemented in Canon cameras, its not a hard and fast limit. The camera will try to abide by your settings...but if it is unable to achieve a proper exposure by following your configured settings, I believe the camera will still do what it has to do to get any exposure at all. In other words, it opts to photograph something, rather than nothing, even if its not exposed exactly how you would prefer.
Upvote 0

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Specs? [CR1]

Richard8971 said:
I have the 7D and I have used and currently own EF-s lenses. One of my favorites that I will never get rid of is my 60mm EF-s macro. Note, I also own the 100mm EF macro and if I had to choose one I would keep the 60 over the 100. It is light, easy to use and extremely sharp. I love using it for macro work as the DOF is greater than the 100mm and 180mm, something i find very useful in 1:1 macro photography.

I second this emotion for the EF-S 60mm. While great for basic macro, it's got a look no other lens has. This image was made holding a T2i in one hand and a flashlight in the other. (F/8.0 at 1/180)

IMG3012-M.jpg
Upvote 0

Earthshatteringly Disappointed With 7D

Timothy_Bruce said:
pj1974 said:
If I can just add my 5 cents worth. There is a place for both the 7D and the 5D (classic and 5DmkII). [How diplomatically started, right] ;D

I've used full frame and APS-C. For me, at this stage and my style of photography, the 7D suits me best. I really appreciate the AF improvements (over my 350D). I'll acknowledge that the 5D's focus is above that of my 350D.

However I even still use my 350D - eg when I really need something light, and I will pack my 18-55mm kit lens, and still achieve great photos.

But for anything sports, moving, macro, etc- my 7D comes out first. Also, I'm very happy with my 7D for landscapes at ISO100, or ISO200, and for low light photos, I do like the 7D's ability and handling. With some careful post processing, I can get images I am thankful for.

Definitely for landscape a 5D or 5DmkII with the FF sensor is most suited for most of those general 'scenic' applications. Though - as I wrote in another post - unless someone's pixel peeping, often it's hard (or impossible) to tell from normal viewing distance if a certain photo was taken with FF or APS-C.

All the best to everyone! :)

Paul

I can totally agree!
I use my old scratchy 350D for the really hard times! When there is the not so small chance that the used camera is smashed on a rock while I am climbing or I could easily fall into salt water with it.
beside I love my 7D but hate that noisy low ISO-Images it produces (no word on hi-ISO ;) )

You realize you're responding to an 8-month old thread right?
Upvote 0

When are Canon going to revise the aged 20mm F2.8 ?

i got the voigtlander 20mmf3.5 color skopar SLII and it is great i really love the sharpness compact size and build quallity
yeah its manual focus but it has electronic aperture control and snappy af confirm which works well. its well worth looking at
i think the only better 20 would be the ziess 21mm which is faster much bigger and heavier and much much more expensive too
Upvote 0

ND Filters - Solid or Graduated

TrumpetPower! said:
Kernuak said:
Personally, I don't like HDR, except on some occasions (there are some good examples). It is far overused in my opinion and in many cases badly (which makes the technique look worse than it is). Putting that aside though, there are many scenes where it just simply doesn't work, such as scenes containing snow to name one example. Also, adding gradients in Lightroom or Photoshop isn't going to recover detail that isn't there in the first place. If the sky is blown, then gradients are a waste of time, at best, you'll get bright white areas, at worst, you may also get weird colour casts. It's far better to use a grad (or two) to preserve the detail, even if it isn't quite enough, so that the detail is there for recovery in processing.
You could do that and I have blended in the past, but I don't really have the patience for sitting editing, I'd rather use my patience waiting for light :P. Slightly illogical maybe, but it's probably that I've had enough of sitting in front of a computer at work.

You misunderstand me.

The gradients aren't of colors or curves or whatever.

The gradients are in the mask and allow you to choose which portions of which exposure are seen.

Take one exposure -2 EV. That's your sky. Take another exposure +2 EV. That's your foreground. Put the +2EV on the bottom layer and the -2 EV on the top layer. Add a mask to the -2 EV layer. On that mask, add a gradient that results in solid white at the top, solid black at the bottom, and a transition gradient somewhere between. How wide the transition, where to place it, and what angle to place it at define the characteristics of your virtual graduated ND filter.

Now, imagine you've got a scene with grass in the foreground, a patch of bright snow in the middle ground, dark (shadowed, forested) mountains in the background, blue sky, and a few bright puffy clouds. No way are you going to get that all in a single exposure with any ND filter ever made, but that's not a problem. Shoot multiple exposures, one for each part of the scene. Then, create your own custom ND filter in post using layer masks.

Of course, this assumes you know something of at least the basic principles of Zone exposure. You wouldn't want your exposure for the snow to put it at middle gray; you'd want it as bright as you can get it without clipping. And that shadowed forest needs to be as dark as you can get it without blocking or getting noisy (though you'd probably overexpose it a bit in the scene and pull it in post). The grass and sky, of course, should be close to middle gray, and the clouds should probably come from the same exposure as the snow.

Then, the challenge in post is nothing more than creating the proper masks for each of the layers.

Cheers,

b&
Upvote 0

Canon 7D with WFT-E5A

canonnovice said:
Has anyone had a good experience using the WFT-E5A to geotag photos using an iPhone to generate the GPS data/location? Other GPS devices? Curious as its a lot of money for the feature. When will Canon include this as a built-in feature in a non-professional grade (realize 7D is bottom of the pro-grade) or more reasonably priced camera?

for what do you need the WFT when using an iPhone to record the track-data ? by bluetooth ? does the iPhone do that kind of BT communication?

I considered an WFT for tethert shooting but most of the time I can use a cable and so it doesn´t justify the cost.
Upvote 0

Focus issues - a different analysis

Mt Spokane Photography said:
The focus screen can be inaccurate. Canon will sell you shims to adjust the position to correct it, or you can ask them to adjust it. sometimes peoplle replace a focus screen but lose those tiny shims.
Live view uses the actual sensor, so you see the actual image being taken.

And at the same time with fast lenses wide open, after having focused properly with liveview at 10x magnification it is educationaly useful to move a camera or focus ring just a little tiny distance to see how shallow the DOF was. It is really shocking when you realize after such an excercise, how low the probability was, that you would hit the target with the viewfinder and naked eye only.
Upvote 0

EOS BODY FOR ARCHITECTURE

KyleSTL said:
poias said:
If you need good IQ, you cannot beat D800. But for that, you have to get Nikon, as Canon is stuck with its 10 year old sensor tech. Since Canon sales are good, they have no incentive to use better sensors. Unless you are stuck to Canon due to financial/equipment commitments, Nikon is the better bet at this time.

Troll. Do you really feel like 36MP is necessary? Unless your're printing in feet instead of inches, it is completely unnecessary. Also, if you're referring to Nikon's perceived high ISO image quality it is a moot point to an architecture photographer who shoots at native ISO (100) about 95% of the time.

How about Nikon's mediocre (compared to Canon) and outdated PC-E lenses? What? Nikon doesn't even manufacture a 17mm lens with shift? That's a shame.

I'm not tryin to be a fanboy, but Canon is clearly the better choice for architectural purposes.

Canon's latest sensors are simply outdated in terms of detail resolution. You cannot bring superior images out of mushy low ISO capabilities. And 36mp for landscape/architecture is NOT overkill. LF, which is the ultimate choice of pro landscape/architecture photogs, goes to hundreds of equivalent MPx. And MF backs can yield 60+ MPx.

Basically, 36mpx is not enough when detail is needed. Canon is simply either incapable of bringing something to the market at competitive pricepoints, or they are milking their fanboys for their worth. Either way, it does not look good to impartial customers.
Upvote 0

Help! used lens problem...

Used lenses have dust! Its the least of things to be concerned about, and, if you get fixiated on looking at dust, you might miss the important things like autofocus or decentering.
Its pretty easy to clean most lenses, but tougher to fix a autofocus motor or IS. Realistically, its not worth considering a used lens unless you save enough for a average repair and still have a 10% margin. I won't buy one unless its at least 30% off retail, usually I go for more.
Upvote 0

Flat lens offers a perfect image

Not to get to nerdy here, but it looks like this is basically a plate of material with graduated index of refraction. These have been built in the past for different applications. The big problem with this is that there is no way to achromatize this type of lens. For operating in the C-band (comms band) it doesn't hurt you too bad because most signals are very narrow (like for IR imagery) but if you tried to push broad spectrum light through this (visible light) the colors will separate badly. Essentially all of the color bend at a slightly different angle through the lens creates the purple and yellow fringing that is often seen in high contrast situations. If nothing is done to correct for the chromatic aberation, you get a smearing/bluring of the image that is much worse than the little fringes.
Upvote 0

Another I need advise on a lens thread......

M.ST said:
Hi,

here my advice:

24L f/1.4 II - great lens, if you need the best image quality buy it

16-35L f/2.8 II - better than the 17-40 but I want besser optical quality

24-70L f/2.8 II - I am under NDA, but I can say: Forget the 24-105 IS and buy this lens, no visible CA, superfast AF. A perfect lens for all who need the best image quality. Only primes perform better.

14-24L f2.8 - If this lens came out, I sell my 16-35L f/2.8 II and go for it. It´s one of the most wanted lenses.

As someone in the industry that uses NDA's frequently... I seriously doubt this person has one. Either total #$%@ or a total newbie. It is always stipulated that even mentioning you are under a NDA is a violation of the NDA. Kinda like fight club... First rule; you don't ever talk about fight club and the second rule... YOU DON'T EVER talk about fight club.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,473
Messages
975,089
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB