Posts

Larsskv · Nov 6, 2018

GMCPhotographics said:
I hear what you are saying. I found the face / eye tracking fine with the RF 24-105, but when I switched to a 35mm f1.4 shooting at f1.4 I found it very skittish and would frustratingly jump between eyes in a very unhelpful way. I then swapped out to my 135mm f2.0 L and found exactly the same issue. After this experience, I didn't even bother with my 85L. I really wanted to like this camera, but I personally found with with my current lens bag...this camera's AF is intolerable and not fit for my purposes. I can't imagine ever putting my 400mm f2.8 LIS on this thing. I think I would bore any wildlife before I'd get it to focus consistently or where I want it to.

A little misunderstanding here. I have turned of eye AF. I mostly use AI Servo, and find the face tracking to work really well most of the time. It is really nice when it works, and you can focus on composition and getting "the moment", and forget about nailing the AF-point.

Face tracking can be a bit frustrating to use when there are more than one potential face in the frame.

mb66energy · Nov 6, 2018

Bob Howland said:
Wouldn't inconsistency in image quality indicate a manufacturing problem, not an optical design quality? How does a new design with a new optical formula correct a manufacturing problem?

Maybe it is a problem to adust the current lens formula - optics and the corresponding mechanical parts - at low cost.
What about another design which is more tolerant to deviations from perfect alignment is cheaper compared to better adjustment of the old design?

Maximilian · Nov 5, 2018

YuengLinger said:
As a US citizen, I can 100% agree with you!

I hope for all of you - and us - that everything will turn to the better - soon.

Maximilian · Nov 5, 2018

Mt Spokane Photography said:
...
I wonder if I would want to put a expensive lens in a silicone sleeve?

No! I wouldn't.

Silicone is only good far way from any technical equipment or technical process. Just ask a varnisher

(and - personaly - it is also not good inside of anybody, if there is no medical need of it - but that's just IMHO. Don't ask a surgeon

)

raptor3x · Nov 5, 2018

I wonder if this coincides with an upgrade to their fab capabilities. I think it's unlikely that they would be able to compete with Sony/Samsung with their current process so maybe this could signal a new process node, and the ability to implement more advanced technologies, for future Canon sensors.

YuengLinger · Nov 5, 2018

Being limited now to buying quality gear from just two or three online sources, it's easy to forget how many EF/EF-S mounts there are in the world, and how many stores are still selling them. Walmart, Target, Kohls, Costco... And in nearly every country. EF/EF-S mount bodies and lenses are pretty much a commodity. Maybe it is a stretch to say five years!

Still, enthusiasts and pros are at least approaching a crossroads. A few years ago, it was just a matter of saving enough money and/or justifying a need for, say, a Big White. Now there's another factor. Buy the current version or wait (and save longer!) for the RF version?

Ozarker · Nov 3, 2018

djack41 said:
Haha! Wish it were true but I also wish there was a Santa.

What? There's was no Saint Nick? Sure there was!

Darkmatter · Nov 3, 2018

41.3%

Got it.

You're sure it isn't 41.2% right!? lol

Anyways, thanks for the tips.

Arête · Nov 3, 2018

Act444 said:
I don't think your wait for a 70-200 2.8 RF will be longer than about a year, if Canon rep statements hold any water. The 100-400, on the other hand, *may* take much longer...

Yeah, I hope the wait isn't too long. When do you think they will come out with teleconverters?

Ozarker · Nov 3, 2018

Berowne · Nov 3, 2018

Great AP, Jon! Thanks for showing.
Greetings Andy

keithcooper · Nov 3, 2018

I wondered about this, since I've reviewed earlier versions of the software.

The effects are quite subtle, the main thing is that this part of the software is good at spotting where the sky is and avoiding halos more than some other tools.

I use luminar as a plugin in Photoshop so this is just another 'quick fix' filter I might use - the bit that many of the naysayers I've noted on DPReview seem to miss is that the better the sky is in your photo, the better that slight application of the filter -might- help. It won't fix a badly composed or exposed sky.

I've a few examples (enlarge to see more clearly) at http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/luminar-update-adds-ai-sky-enhancement/

snappy604 · Nov 2, 2018

surprised anything ADATA made top 5.. I've personally had good luck with ADATA, but it used to have a repoutation of being cheap. Might have to look into it again!

Jethro · Nov 1, 2018

The DP article seems to be in the context of things that could possibly be changed in the expected firmware update, which is why it may seem a bit esoteric at times. Some of these functions I've frankly never used, so I barely understand them. The point about universal customisation of buttons is a long-term criticism of Canon bodies, although I suppose given the pretty radical changes to the FFM system, now would be the time if it's ever going to happen.

Viggo · Nov 1, 2018

BillB said:
A 50% hit rate at f1.2 might or might not have much to do with IS or shutter speed. There just isn't much depth of field to work with.

Agreed with that.

And there’s also a huge factor what focusing modes and otherwise settings being used. If one just uses some sort of area and tracking no wonder it’s not 100% hit rate.

I used single point, no issues.

Woody · Nov 1, 2018

Mt Spokane Photography said:
There are others like Nikkei who estimate market shares based on figures from selected camera sellers.

While what you said is true (CIPA figures are based on shipment whereas Canon provided sales numbers), there is a correlation between the 2. The link you gave is correct only for the first 2 quarters of 2018. There is a steep decline in Canon's market shares in Q3. I believe this may be attributed to poor sales of DSLRs and Canon has some serious catching-up to do for their MILCs. Expect faster MILC roll outs and huge discounts from Canon in Q4 2018.

Rocky · Nov 1, 2018

For APS-C sensor, M mount makes more sense. Look at the existing M system now, it is as compact as it can be. It can use practically ANY lens that has ever made since 1930’s with the proper adapter. That cannot be said with the RF mount. Also the RF lenses are HUGE compare to the M lenses. If Canon put his mind into it, they can come up with M lenses as good as L lenses. There is no reason why Canon cannot have two mirrorless lenses lines. They are doing it now.

Mt Spokane Photography · Nov 1, 2018

I have a dock, no lens, it went away last Monday. I kept it in the event I find a Sigma lens I want, but that seems unlikely.

YuengLinger · Oct 31, 2018

JBSF said:
Yes. They will start using wires.

Or better yet, IBIS. And the quality of work that impressed even somebody who has done many, many tear-downs.

Tanguy · Oct 31, 2018

I agree I think the M5 is so far the best in this format of course. Any pertinent information about more specifications and date of release for the M5 Mark2?
Somebody must have some updates

Hector1970 · Oct 31, 2018

Thanks Phil and Mt Spokane.
I think I will give the repair serious consideration.
It will buy time to see what Canon bring out next.
I'd be tempted to buy a 1D R if it were stellar when it came out. That could still be a long way off and I'd need to save for it

3kramd5 · Oct 31, 2018

mirage said:
in-body sensor IS does not have to be lens- or camera-specific. sensor input plus software that analyzes image from sensor in real time and determines actuator inputs to position sensor so that image stays centered on it. No matter, what lens may be attached to camera.

Canon’s M50 system works with image analysis to determine cropping in a frame by frame basis.

The IBIS systems in Olympus, Sony, etc. measure camera movement with gyros and compensate with sensor actuation. That’s why they need to know the focal length and focus distance of the lens to work properly.

ethanz · Oct 31, 2018

Also it is nice to see the HD video out of the camera is sharp. I know some other cameras (such as my own) have been accused of having soft HD video, but exceptional 4K.

tron · Oct 30, 2018

garyinstereo said:
Of course I just bought the G7 X Mark II this morning and then I see the mark III gets rumoured! I'm still planning to use the mark II until the mark III comes out and maybe I'll upgrade if the features are a great improvement (Usable 4K video, mic input, higher video frame rates). I also own the 5D mark II & IV but wanted to get a nice point & shoot to carry around daily.

It ws also rumoured many months ago! I find it difficult to has better IQ if the sensor remains at 1inch - which I am sure it will remain so as to keep the same dimensions.
Everything else is a minor improvement (I also have G7XII and I like it).

7DmkI · Oct 30, 2018

Mt Spokane Photography said:
How does a Toronto seller avoid the HST? I used to live there, but its been 25 years ago, so I don't know how things are done now.

Just Curious. I know there are some sellers on kijii, how do they avoid taxes for selling a new item? Sounds shady and risky.

The ad is in a buy and sell forum as private sale.

Posts

Posts

Filter

Forum statistics

Gallery statistics