Canon Continues Leadership of DSLR Camera Market With A Dominating Performance at the Big Game in Mi

Re: Canon Continues Leadership of DSLR Camera Market With A Dominating Performance at the Big Game i

Talys said:
ethanz said:
Talys said:
I would point out that it isn't particularly strange that Canon isn't #1 in FF ILC sales. They haven't had a high end release since 5D Mark IV, and a lot of people who want and can afford a flagship Canon (which is a lot of FF people), have purchased at least one 1DXII and/or 5D Mark IV.

Except Canon was #1 in FF ILC sales for the whole year of 2017. Sony was #2 for only two months. Nikon was #1 for only one month.

Right, I should have been clear: It's not surprising that they weren't first for a couple of months, where Nikon and Sony both released new FF flagships.

At some point, D850 and A7RIII sales will taper, because those most eager to buy one will have done so.

Ok. And I do agree with your points.
Upvote 0

Trip to India - any advice?

Ladislav said:
  • I returned from India on Monday. It was an awesome trip with endless opportunities for photography.

    At the end I wasn't able to extend my trip and I excluded Varanasi just to not make it too stretched. My final itinerary was:
    • Day 1: Arriving to Delhi, taxi to Agra, Wedding reception
    • Day 2: Taj Mahal, Turmeric Ceremony for Wedding, Agra fort, Wedding
    • Day 3: (renting car and driver) Fatehpur Sikri, Mathura
    • Day 4: (renting car and driver) Mathura, Deeg Fort and Palace, Chand Baori (step well), arriving to Jaipur
    • Day 5: Jaipur -> Hawa Mahal, Jantar Mantar, City Palace, Isarlat Sargasooli, Jal Mahal, Galta Ji temples, The Sun temple, Albert Hall at night
    • Day 6: Jaipur -> Amber Fort, Panna Meena ka Kund (step well), Jaigarh Fort, Nahargarh Fort
    • Day 7: Taxi to Delhi, Hauz Khaz village in the evening and night stroll around India Gate
    • Day 8: Delhi -> Gurudwara Bangla Sahib, Jantar Mantar, Jama Masjid, Old Delhi bazaars and spice market, night stroll around Vijay Chowk
    • Day 9: Delhi -> Red Fort, Qutub Minar, Humayun's Tomb
    • Day 10: India Gate, Agrasen ki Baoli (step well), flight back

    There were few misses because of my poor planning - Lotus temple and Akshardham in Delhi were closed when I wanted to visit. The biggest disappointment was Red Fort in Delhi.

    I could definitely spend one more day in all locations I visited (Agra, Jaipur, Delhi and probably even Mathura). There was plenty more to see.

    While I like taking pictures of architecture, cityscapes and landscapes, most of pictures I took back are just snapshots of what was happening in the street or on the road. I also took quite lot of pictures of animals. I regretted that I didn't have longer lens for eagles flying around minarets in Delhi.

    Btw. I didn't use tripod at all. I was using just bean bag for night photography.

Glad you had a good time.
Upvote 0

Sigma Announces the 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens Development

Jim Saunders said:
Is it just me or does it look like the stock foot has an ARCA Swiss dovetail?

Jim

Yes that's a seriously nice feature and one that canon should wake up to.

My only two reservations with this lens, and on paper it looks amazing...is the old Sigma Achilles heel....focus accuracy.
Sigma seem to be pushing their lens design capability for a few years now with their ART range, but a common issue is their capability to design AF motors that can consistently and accurately focus with slim Depth of Field demands. So far there have been a lot of issues in that regard, If Sigma can't make a 35mm or 50mm f1.4 focus accurately...then what are they going to be like with an even more demanding lens like a 105mm f1.4?

How is it that Sigma can make a lens that is vastly larger, bulkier and heavier that the Nikon version? the Nikon version looks very much like a Canon 85mm f1.2 II L in terms of it's size, proportions and look. The Sigma looks like it was modelled on a 300mm f2.8 LIS!

The other observations is...where are all the idiot posts here on CR moaning about the lack of an image stabiliser? Isn't that the usual CR response to an ultra bright telephoto prime lens these days? Or is that just reserved for Canon lenses?
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the EOS Rebel 4000D, The Cheapest DSLR Ever? Will Come to North America as the EOS R

Re: Will Canon's strategy to counter smart phones be effective?

rsdofny said:
It appears to me that Canon has the impression of a clunky DSLR is the ultimate upgrade path for ordinary people. A more informed consumer will know that there are a lot more capable mirrorless camera. ala Sony A6X00s, comes in very, very small package. Personally, I think that Canon over-complicates its lineup to milk enough profit at the low end while preserving the profit margin at the high end camera. Will that strategy work in face of Sony's aggressive product introduction and slowly maturing lens lineup (including 3rd party)?

A few years ago I was eagerly awaiting a successor to the A6000, and I'm still waiting.
Same for the A5100.
All Sony has done since then is made even more expensive bodies. The A6000 is ancient and overpriced for what it does, Sony should have discontinued it and the A5300 years ago, even if just to refresh the user interface.
Upvote 0

Canon Inc. Boss Wants to See More Innovation

It seems to me that since the problems with the 1D M3 Canon has become much more conservative. Too bad. Their cutting edge products, 5Ds/R, are tepid. It seems they are afraid to push the envelop for fear of what? Eating their own lunch, someone is going to eat it, they don't, Nikon or Sony will? Of failing and having egg on their faces. They will need to handle the problems than they did with 1D3.
Upvote 0

Canon U.S.A. Builds on Success of the “One Canon” Strategy

HTML:
<p><strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., March 1, 2018</strong> – Canon U.S.A., Inc. a leader in digital imaging solutions, concluded its One Canon Event, held February 12-14 in Hollywood, Florida. The annual gathering of esteemed industry analysts and press commemorated the Company’s inclusive and inventive approaches to its diverse customers and the continued success of the One Canon business strategy. The exclusive event provided over 45 industry analysts and journalists the opportunity to engage with executive leaders, customers, and business partners, and hear about the Company’s strategic evolution to continue to help foster strong growth and performance drivers going forward.</p>
<p>Key executives updated guests on the impact the One Canon strategy is having on the company as a whole, while providing examples of successful One Canon collaborations positively affecting customers, partners, and the company’s dealer channel. Leaders from business units also gave guests an inside look into industry-leading products, service, and marketing programs that continue to differentiate Canon as a dynamic force in the print industry.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>One major highlight of the event was the announcement of the third generation imageRUNNER ADVANCE 2<sup>nd</sup> edition models, a refresh of the three-time BLI Line of the Year award-winning platform that will be available in spring 2018.</p>
<p>The launch features improvements that target three core needs of technology decision makers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Simplify – The power to streamline user workflows and ease the implementation and management of technology (Cloud-capabilities)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Control – The power to take command of costs, manage print usage and implement a secure solution (New levels of security)</li>
<li>Evolve – The power to expand capabilities and stay ahead of change (Continuous improvement)</li>
</ul>
<p>“This is our second year celebrating the One Canon strategy, a customer-first principle which represents our inclusive approach toward delivering integrated solutions offerings based on innovation, possibility and smart solutions,” said Toyotsugu Kuwamura, executive vice president and general manager, Business Imaging Solutions Group, Canon U.S.A., Inc. “By coming together across the Canon Family of companies and working side by side with our customers and channel partners, we continue to seek new and inventive ways to drive change in the industry.”</p>
<p>During the two-day event, guests not only attended executive presentations, but were given the opportunity to hear directly from Canon customers and partners during the event’s “Successful Solutions” session that gave unique insight into how the company continues to collaborate and focus on forward-thinking innovation.</p>
<p>Representatives from Mount Ida College, Pixelwerx, Southwestern Blueprint, and Arna Marketing enhanced the conversation by participating in on-stage interviews where they each had the opportunity to share their unique perspective on the Canon approach and how it helps advance their organizations. In addition, following the success of Canon’s dealer relations portion, which included dynamic interviews with key partners, the company again reiterated its commitment to establishing strong partnerships with independent dealers by inviting Ryan Jones from American Business Machines and his customer, Borden Newman from Editorial Renuevo to speak alongside BISG senior vice president and general manager, Mason Olds.</p>
<p>“Mount Ida College may be considered small compared to other institutions, but Canon has always made us feel that we are as important to them as anyone else would be,” said Jill Abrahams, vice president for Advancement at Mount Ida College. “We were thrilled to be asked to participate in this event, and look forward to continue working side-by-side with Canon on future initiatives.”</p>
<p>Abrahams was joined on stage by her colleague Jason Donati, Dean at Mount Ida College, who added, “Our alliance with Canon has enriched many of our student programs, with tangible items such as providing high quality cameras and printers, to participating in our business entrepreneur event, to supporting other key initiatives of our school. We were delighted to be able to present this unique relationship to the media through the One Canon Event.”</p>
<p>The event included a landmark announcement from Canon Solutions America on the advancement to its security offerings. Pete Kowalczuk, president of Canon Solutions America, detailed the far-reaching enhancements during a presentation that included Carlos Fernandes, CEO, Agile Cybersecurity Solutions, and Ajay Arora, CEO of Vera, the company’s new security partners. To learn more about those partnerships, visit <a href="https://csa.canon.com/online/portal/csa/csa/company/pressreleases" target="blank"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
<p>For more information on products and solutions launched at the event please visit the Canon <a href="https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/about/newsroom/press-releases" target="blank"><strong>newsroom</strong></a>.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Leaked: Canon EOS M50 Image & Specifications

dak723 said:
Quarkcharmed said:
dak723 said:
Ha Ha Ha! I guess I will have to give a refund to all those folks that bought 8" x 12" prints taken with my 6 MP 300D! Those prints, by the way, are indistinguishable from the prints made with my 20 MP 6D. Always fun to see someone so wrong as they try so hard to make a point.

Prints of what DPI? say 300DPI, 8*300*12*300 = 8640000, it's 8.6MP, a bit larger than 6MP, but well within the capacity of the 6D.

If you print at 150DPI (which in my opinion is too low for 8x12 prints), then yes the prints will look roughly the same.

8" x 12" prints from my old 6 MP Digital Rebel were about 250 ppi, which as Talys mentions is plenty good enough. And as he also mentions, if you want to go bigger, than, of course, 20 MP is better.

In fact, with my 6 MP rebel, I could get excellent quality prints printing as low as 180 ppi. I have a cropped pic that's approx. 3.2 MP (2046 x 1536) printed to approx. 8.5 x 11. The larger pixels seemed to make it possible to print at a lower ppi and still get really good results. When I got an 18 MP camera a few years ago, I felt that somewhere around 220-240 ppi was as low as I could go to make a sharp print. Of course, now we will hear how the size of the pixels doesn't matter. Well, maybe not always, but in my experience with the cameras I have had - it does.

Sorry I'm guilty of mixing up dpi vs ppi. Yes I meant ppi of course.

I'm a pixel-peeper and also short-sighted so usually examine the prints closely, 240ppi doesn't feel enough for an A4-sized print. I.e. 240 may be fine if you hang it on the wall, but I'm not sure about putting it into an album where people would see it at a close proximity.

As to your experience with large vs small sensor pixels, this post http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=34536.msg710338#msg710338 is a good illustration, the image looks ok downscaled but evidently blurred at full res, and it's not a focus issue. That is, 6MP camera doesn't necessarily do 6 actual megapixels, neither does 18MP camera. It depends on multiple conditions, including the lens quality and how the image is processed in camera and how noisy it is.
Still 18MP should be better than 6MP (literally 3 times better) in most cases, I don't know why you experienced the opposite.
Upvote 0

Canon ff mirrorless - where will it fit in the line up?

bwud said:
mjg79 said:
For one thing look at a Sony A7 with a 24-70/2.8 lens - it's not only a bigger package than a 5D with 24-70L

A Sony 24-70 2.8 GM on an A7 slightly [perhaps: insignificantly] longer overall package than the (newest) Canon 24-70 2.8 L II mounted to a 5D, but the package is not bigger overall.

I don’t quite follow why people seemingly assume that Sony’s first attempt at full frame lenses for its mirrorless mount represents anything other than that: Sony’s first attempt. It has little bearing on how canon might design a shorter flange lens. Additionally, like Canon is often able to make things smaller (my 24-70 2.8L is longer and heavier than the current II model, and makes for a longer package than the a7+GM), so might be Sony with a version II.

That said, I agree with the potential for re-purposing EF for mixed used as described.

True, I should have been more clear what I meant, I wasn't really trying to argue a very specific point about the 24-70GM lens more I was trying to say that when it comes to fast aperture, full frame lenses with a focal length greater than 24-35mm there isn't any reason to assume the lenses are going to be *dramatically* smaller with a shorter flange distance so I picked one that is bigger just to illustrate it (and yes you're correct the overall package was the wrong term, I meant that it is longer overall - albeit only slightly).

You're quite right, it's possible Sony will refine it and make it smaller in coming years. I think many had assumed however, when the A7 first came out, that we would be seeing the benefits seen in for example the Loxia 21mm/2.8 replicated across the spectrum and would be able to get very small 85/1.4, 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 lenses. I don't believe we will get an FE mount 24-70/2.8, for example, that is half the size of the current one.

I think the belief that the lenses would get dramatically smaller underpins many of the arguments that Canon must abandon the EF mount and I think the picture is more complicated than that.

Whatever happens I am very happy that the market is heating up in terms of cameras, formats and lenses from so many manufacturers; I think Canon will fight back hard in the coming years.
Upvote 0

Optimizing AF with the Canon 85mm 1.4L IS?

YuengLinger said:
Hi suspect that some of my problems, especially the completely out of focus shots in between good ones, might be coming from my fingers slightly turning the focus ring. I'm trying now to find a grip that holds the lens steady but doesn't result in my fingers moving the ring.

Also, I think my expectations might have been a bit high.

As for having more problems on the 5D Mark 4, is it possible the AF system is too fast for the optical elements to keep up with? Could the older, slower AF system on the 5D III be a better match?

I recommend using the back-button focus and following the subject at all times. Also, for focusing I would suggest either 4 AF point expansion or 8 AF point expansion, as suggested here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0i2_CHhp9Q4
Nelu
Upvote 0

M50 Eye tracking Preview Video - let's discuss

Talys said:
Jester74 said:
Talys said:
Jester74 said:
Do you use the center AF-point and recompose, or choose the closest of the many AF-points? Cos recomposing can cause shifts in focus....

Eye AF should not work like that. You should be able to select a zone, and it finds the nearest eye to you and AF's to that. On the video, it looks like it follows her after it locks, but I thought I read somewhere that it was only compatible with one-shot AF.

Yes, it should work like that. But I meant his original camera, the 5D mk III, which has a lot of AF-points...


Ahhh, I see. I think there was a poll recently, and the most popular technique was center point zoomed out, and crop. This is what I do on 6D2, though if I want upper high resolution I will either select another AF point or MF in magnified live view.

I don't remember that poll, but on my 5DmkIII I used the joystick to choose the closest AF-point and slightly recompose the shot if it was necessary. I do this on my 1DX now and it works mostly...:) If one single point is not enough, I set single plus 4 adjacent AF-points. It helps when the contrast is not enough for 1 point.
Upvote 0

PetaPixel: 6D2 vs. 6D1 noise comparisons

mistaspeedy said:
I have also never seen this method for measuring/evaluating noise.

I tend to agree with the data from dxomark, which I can also cross-reference with other sites like dpreview and view the images for myself.

So my opinion does not exactly line up with theirs (Petapixel).

dxomark says that the 6D mark II has slightly less noise over the entire ISO range (this is when we look at highlights and midtones... SNR evaluation)

However, when we look at dynamic range and shadows, the original 6D has an advantage across the entire ISO range.
Tonal range seems to be about the same.
Color sensitivity is better across the whole range for the 6D mark II
Of course, rarely mentioned, the 6D mark II images will be sharper due to increased resolution, even when downsized to a smaller size.

Seems to me that most of the time, I would rather have a 6D mark II than a 6D, with the exception of high ISO shooting combined with lots of shadows in the frame.

There's less difference in color sensitivity than there is in tonal range. The only perceptible difference is in DR.

https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-6D-Mark-II-versus-Canon-EOS-6D-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-III___1170_836_795
Upvote 0

PetaPixel poops on the 6D2 sensor

Isaacheus said:
neuroanatomist said:
jester73 said:
I have a clear analogy of the situation with the sensor 6d mark 2:
If the 5d4 sensor is the original Canon sensor of the last generation, then the sensor 6d mark 2 is like a "Chinese fake", as Canon claims to use the most advanced sensor available. Regardless of how much it is worse than the original, or how much it justifies its price, or how many people will buy a camera with such a sensor, it remains a "fake".
And on any serious trading platform sellers of fakes will be banned for the sale of fakes.
If someone wants to sell sensors of the previous generation, then do not talk about the last generation, and do not deceive customers.

The analogy for the 6D → 6DII sensor is the 5DII → 5DIII upgrade. The sensor was basically the same ('if it ain't broke, don't fix it), pretty much everything else got a major performance bump.

I'm not so sure everything got an upgrade though; it really looks like all that's improved is the af (both stills and video) , screen and fps. The sensor has a small resolution bump, but otherwise is the same tech, and the video quality has been downgraded from the looks.

I was under the impression the 5d2 to 5d3 added quite a bit more, dual cards, better video, headphone jack etc. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

My opinion at this stage is that the 6d 2 is an improvement overall, but for the cost, it really fell short of the potential camera it really could have been.

RGB+IR metering
Flicker reduction

If you've never shot sports under artificial lighting (or anything else under the kind of lights found in most gyms and most stadiums that don't host NBA, NFL, MLB, or major college teams in sports that are regularly televised), you have no idea how much those two are worth.

Particularly the flicker reduction. Not only does it time the shutter to release at the same point in the 100Hz/120Hz cycle such lights blink at, but it does so at the *peak* of each cycle. Not only do you get near uniform color and brightness from one frame to the next (and very little to no color shift from top to bottom of the frame), but you gain anywhere from 1/2 to a full stop of shutter speed where you need it the most!
Upvote 0

Serpent

I did a bodyscaping and body projection shoot on Monday. I am not sure exactly what I can post here so all I have is this. Are boobies allowed? If it is in an abstract context? Canon's 24-70 f/2.8L II is cementing it's place in my heart.

Attachments

  • Snake Paint 1 web.jpg
    Snake Paint 1 web.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 204

Three more beauties from Colombia...

Glenn, once again I really love to see how you can manage to put the AF and the sharpness on the right spot.

TBO and not knowing how you do your PP to me it seems that there is a little bit too much sharpening in post, esp. in the pic of the Blue-whiskered Tanager. See the slight artefacts at the oof vertical branch for example.

But this could be also recalculation of the size.
And - of course - it's always all about taste.
Upvote 0

Canon Announces the EOS Rebel T7

hendrik-sg said:
AvTvM said:
who cares about that mirrorflicker. Really only targeted at those total n00bs convinced that "only a DSLR captures really good, *pro-quality* images" ... ;D

You are posting the same in all threads. You have exactly no argument for your opinion, it's just hate. Why?

I believe that since the first time AvTvM looked in a mirror he has hated them ever since ;)

But to give him his due, since Canon introduced the 5DS/r with its motorised mirror he has at least changed his favoured insult from "mirrorslapper" to "mirrorflicker" as no one could ever accuse the 5DS of having mirror slap. :)
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,644
Members
24,805
Latest member
track inspector

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB