It's been three years and I still prefer single point. I'm looking forward to trying eye control, but I had just bought the R5 so I wasn't going to buy an R3 so soon. I know I should try the finger on the screen control, but my big nose hits it

Thank god it does not sport zi-trans

If we assume these throughput figures to be accurate, is the R1 will have 1.5x the processing capability of the R3, and assuming the frame rate is the same as the other newer cameras. The the R1 is likely to have a sensor in the 36mp region. The R5ii will have a max fps bump to 30 but retain the same resolution. However, the next round of cameras the fps should remain the same and the sensors could get a 1.5x increase in resolution. A R6iii @ 36mp and a R5iii @ 67mp.

Richard CR said:

that reminds of when I tried out an A5 I think - I can't remember which number.

It made my original EOS-M's autofocus feel modern.

Click to expand...

It's impressive how far behind not only the performance of their AF system is, but its interface and implementation. Canon has always excelled with creating user interfaces that are logically thought out and user friendly. Fuji almost seems hellbent on creating the opposite - it's arbitrarily complicated. Just the idea that they have automatic subject detection...only when the camera is entirely in full auto? haha WHY!?

Great shots. Well done, Sir!

AlanF said:

The hood won't fit over my Marumi filter attached to the lens. Presumably need a slim one. Same on the RF 800/11.

Click to expand...

No problem with my filter, a B + W f-pro, its metal frame is slim enough.

Michael Clark said:

Don't waste your time telling me what I already know, tell @PhotoBob to whom I was replying.

Click to expand...

Sorry, tag the wrong guy

Canon Rumors Guy said:

It’s REALLY hard not to look at this camera and go “Craig, it’s my birthday!” (which it actually is tomorrow) For $5000 – that’s a lot of camera. Preorder from our fine friends at B&H Photovideo here, or our other friends who are still trying to scramble from the copy / paste specifications on the

See full article...

Click to expand...

My wedding anniversary is tomorrow, so I showed this to my wife. I think she is still chuckling.
For an anniversary gift, she is willing to paste the Fujifilm logo on my Canon gear.

Someone at Adorama was either about to get fired and knew it, or about to say, "Take this job and shove it".

Chris Ennis said:

It is disappointing that Canon is leaving the camera market: "We will definitely be publishing the exiting stuff soon."

Click to expand...

Oh, so you noticed, didja'?

Wow

\"With no great surprise, the R100 is nowhere to be found.\"

Thank you this. Canon dunking on themselves bringing out that POS.

EOS 4 Life said:

"No. 10 Canon EOS Kiss X10 Double Zoom Kit Black KISSX10BK-WKIT"
Wow

Click to expand...

If Canon doesn't stop making it, it would sell more the next few years. Such as PowerShot SX740 HS, the selling is no. 1 in Japan.

Canon announces the development of the Canon RF R1, the long-awaited flagship for the RF system. Not much to see from YouTube, hopefully Canon will put more more as the times on. Canon USA Press Release: New Image Processing System Further Improves AF and Image Quality MELVILLE, N.Y., May 15, 2024 – Canon U.S.A., Inc. today announced

See full article...

These look like really cool completely manual and non-electrically connected lenses for the RF mount. Availability is expected around mid-June and are available for preorder via B&H Photo video. Press Release: Thypoch Expands Simera 35mm & 28mm f/1.4 Lineup to Z/ X/ E/ RF Mounts Thypoch, the emerging manufacturer of photo lenses in vintage look,

See full article...

Sirui has released the Night Walker 16mm T1.2 S35 as well as the 74mm T1.2 S35 cine lens. it was announced some time back in April and now is officially released for the Canon RF mount and others. Since they are S35 Cini lenses, they are suitable for APS-C-sized sensors, as Super 35 is slightly

See full article...

dcm said:

Ah yes, life was simpler before calculators. I still have my engineering slide rule from back in the day when 1 or 2 digits and a power of 10 was sufficient for a lot of things and 3 digits was a stretch. My neighbor in the concrete business lamented customers with their plotted plans that expect concrete poured to quarter-inch tolerances when the forms will bow more than that.

Even now, most people I run into want things in relatable, ballpark terms like 750 or 800, not 776. The details usually come out only when comparing detailed specifications, and most of the time there really isn't a significant difference.

I treat all focal lengths and f-stops as "around x". Life is easier this way.

Click to expand...

Many of us are not "most people" when it comes to the technical details of our photography equipment.

neuroanatomist said:

How many of the 5,926,733 shipped in 2022 and the 5,998,913 ILCs shipped last year were bought by wildlife photographers? I’m curious how ‘massive’ the wildlife photography market is and how much growth in it is occurring. Looking forward to seeing the data on which you base your claim.


Anecdotes are nice. Since Canon hasn’t lost their nearly 50% market share, I question the relevance of this and similar anecdotes.

Click to expand...

I think it's nearly impossible for us to say because we have some great photographers sharing photos here using even the RF 100-400 and on up. Some people are going to have multiple wildlife lenses while others will only use one. We can be confident the manufacturers know much more than we do.

We can expect some people decided to choose Canon for the RF200-800 or the RF100-400. I'd wager how many is at least in the same range as the number of people who switched to a different manufacturer.

I can't imagine it matters very much because many of us are already impressed with what we have and as we often mention, once someone has a relatively significant number of high-priced lenses, switching camera mounts becomes less appealing.

In this patent application (2024-063513), Canon is looking at improving the subwavelength coatings for optical elements. In an optical system constituted by optical elements, reflection of incident light on the surface and inner surface of the optical element is undesirable because it causes a loss in the amount of transmitted light and reflection ghosts. Therefore,

See full article...

NKD said:

I'd only consider the Canon high MP body if it had dynamic range near the GFX system, but may not be possible on a FF sensor.

Click to expand...

Everything you wrote up to this one sentence is no longer relevant. All KB-Sensors could not reach the gain of a medium format sensor. The pixels have a greater diameter and the pixelspace is geater. All of them are related to the performance values like S/N-Ratio and Sensivity.
I would like to have a 60MP resolution on a ff format sensor in a body like the R5. Wenni compare the 5Ds with the R5 pictures like doing macro photos, the 5ds pictures looks more naturaly that the R5. I own both and some other canons. The R5 hase some advantages. The sensivity is higher, the noise is quite less and the EVF is an advantage for me if i am do macros. I can see the motiv outdoor even the sun is bright. The OVF digital systems are designed and optimized for the automatik focus use-case. Manual focus operation is not good supported. The all misses a traditional focus screen. for bodies like 5DM4, 5Ds and later, this is not available to buy and mount as an add-on.
And yes, all the lenses needs to be in good quality too, if the sensor resolutes more than 50MP., to so the advantage on the picture at the developing process.
Canon had decide to be an expensive system. I yould not buy Canon again, as long they not license their RF Mount to third-party lense buildes like Sigma.
Actually they had done this but only for the APS-C Systems. I assume, they don't want to build better lenses for APS-C and let Sigma and Tamron doing this.
The next System will be a Sony A7R5 or newer. Actual, my R5 and the R are the two bodies i use in most cases. I have all lenses that i require - EF-Mount mit Converter of course.

Finally a proper 1:1 macro for ‘medium’ format!

becceric said:

Some b&w versions of Trilliums I've already posted. I guess monochrome shots of white flowers are a easy mental jump for me.View attachment 216630View attachment 216632View attachment 216633
The second image is a crop of the first.

Click to expand...

They're nice. It is easier to visualize how a white flower will look. Solid colors can sometimes be different from what I thought and flowers with multiple colors might be really different. It does make me consider buying a nice set of colored filters.

Pretty cheap, if you ask me.

Well that's pretty cool... maybe it deserves a mention on the site. Thanks for sharing.

Person taking a photograph of the Academy in a snow squall...