EOS 1DX vs. EOS 5D MARK III for Weddings,
- EOS Bodies
- 36 Replies
If money is not the problem, I don't see any motivation not to want the 1Dx.
Upvote
0
I pretty much shoot raw all the time anyway, the 7d jpeg engine isn't too smart when it comes to low lightRyan708 said:get a larger card and shoot raw all the time? haha didnt think about the WB being more touchy, but i suppose with all that extra color!
Dylan777 said:Razor2012 said:Dylan777 said:until then....shooting 5D III + 16-35 II is not so bad at all.
A 14-24 would be great, but the 16-35 II will have to suffice for a while.
;D ;D ;D....I'll bring 5D III + 16-35 II with me next coming trip to Hong Kong & China. Helllllloooooo chinese food![]()
Axilrod said:chabotc said:Wow now thats some serious lens action - 24k for a lens is a mind blowing amount when you're used to DSLR pricing
I do wonder, are they really _that_ much better?
$24k is average for a cinema lens, heck the zooms they released earlier this year are both around $43k. A full set of Arri cinema primes is between $100,000-$180,000 depending on which set you get. These clearly aren't for consumers.
atvinyard said:Also, invest in Lightroom if you can. Post processing can make a big difference in final picture quality.
unfocused said:While I'm usually all for renting, I'd suggest you do the math.
14 day rental of the 5DIII will run you about $400 (with damage waiver and you definitely don't want to rent without the waiver).
Ask yourself which is the better deal: Rent the 5D or pick up a refurbished 7D ($1,360) or 60 D ($800) and sell it later when a new model comes out. If you think you can sell the 7D or the 60D for more than the price less rental, you could be money ahead buying. Plus you'll both have cameras until the next model comes out.
LetTheRightLensIn said:I had a D800, cropping does not save space, it cuts away part of the image. SRAW that Canon has saves space, but Nikon has nothing similar.gnd said:preppyak said:Most importantly, for many that want larger MP, their end usage is not a computer screen; it's a much larger, higher res print version.
high MP count with a crop mode to save space (ala D800) or medium count on a smaller sensor (ala 7D) can be good when you need to crop heavily such as for distant wildlife too
I would not want to pay $$$ for a FF camera and then convert it to a crop.
bdunbar79 said:If I take this question objectively, that is, the 50L or the TS-E 45 lens, then I'd get the 50L. It is a way sharper lens. However, I realize the TS-E 45 lens is not nearly the best TS lens. If money were no object I'd probably get the 24 II TS lens. But, answering your question specifically, the 50L.
wopbv4 said:Hi,
feel pretty stupid now.
Thanks to all that pointed towards the iso setting!!
Changed iso to 100 and count goes up to from 665 to 829
Thanks very much !!