• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Nikon 600PF coming soon?

NikonRumors is reporting that a 600mm PF lens may be announced this summer. Of course the reportedly stellar 500 PF that came out late last year has been unavailable for months.

Canon Loan Evaluation Return Stolen/Missing during FedEx Shipment!!

I am not sure if I am posting this in the correct forum, but I wanted to share my story in the event others (hopefully not) find themselves in a similar situation.

I currently own a 5D IV along with a few L lenses which I have been extremely happy with. With the release of the EOS RP, I was curious about the Canon full frame mirrorless series considering a pro-level body would be coming at some point. I ended up getting a Loan Evaluation of the EOS R through the CPS Program.

The EOS R arrived with an EF adapter (as requested), a battery, a charger and a bag. I used it for a few days. It was fun but not for me.

I used the same box it came in and returned it to Canon (to Virginia from NYC) via FedEx Ground. I used my FedEx account. I weighed the package at home (about 7 pounds) and printed out the Fedex Label, adding a "Declared Value" for the amount of the contents (for an extra fee of course). I took it to the FedEx drop off location counter and asked for a receipt. (Smart decision ever!!!) She counter-person weighed the package (6.8 pounds) and printed me a drop-off receipt listing the tracking number and the weight.

Two days later, I received an item return confirmation from Canon CPS, noting that the charger, EF adapter and bag were returned but that the EOS R and the battery (which was inside the EOS R) were not!! Initially I thought there was some kind of mistake and contacted Canon who checked the package again and were unable to find the camera and battery.

Puzzled by this I decided to look at the tracking information and package details. I soon noticed that my originally shipped 6.8 pound package was delivered weighing 5.1 pounds!! Packages don't magically lose weight during shipment. And of course the difference in weight was similar to the weight of the EOS R body and battery. It was clear to me that the body and battery were removed from the package while in FedEx's possession, resealed and sent on its way.

I filed a claim with FedEx adding scans of the original drop off receipt noting 6.8 pounds and a printout of the delivery records noting 5.1 pounds. I figured with that hard evidence, this would be a routine open and shizzle case...I mean how can they justify the weight difference...a difference that was noted by their own facilities using their own scales. FedEx Claims called me back about 10 days later saying that they needed me to have the original package available for them to inspect for tampering! I explained to them that this wasn't a damaged package claim and that the missing weight account for the weight of the items missing. I explained that a package doesn't just lose weight on its own!! When I asked her for an explanation she could not give me one to justify the weight difference. She concluded that if the original packaging isn't available for them to inspect, there is NOTHING they can do for me and they have to deny the claim.

Canon discarded the packaging soon after it arrived. They explained that if the box does not appear to be damaged, they discard the box, so it was not available for FedEx's inspection.

At this point, I figured the best way to handle this was go straight to the top. I figured if I can alert a higher-up about a potential (and likely) thieving employee, that may cause some concern. I used the Elliott Advocacy website and was able to get names and emails of FedEx executives. https://www.elliott.org/company-contacts/fedex/

I emailed my original claim narrative to them noting that it was denied despite the clear evidence that items (weight) was removed from the package while in FedEx's possession. The next day I received an email from someone from Executive Management saying that my claim was forwarded to him for escalation and that my claims will be honored!!! A check for the amount of the missing items and the freight charge was mailed to me a few days later. The check cleared immediately.

BTW if you are wondering how Canon responded to this...well they sort of didn't. They were nice and understood the situation but in the end they needed either their equipment returned or compensation for it. After I explained to them what happened, they sent me an invoice for the missing items and gave me 30 days to pay it, otherwise the invoice would go to their legal department for collections. Initially I was a bit disappointed that Canon was unable to contact FEdEx themselves as I figured that FedEx would more likely listen or act on a claim from CANON as opposed to little old me but...I do understand that it is the sender's responsibility in almost all cases (Ebay, etc...) to make sure the item reaches the recipient and it it usually the seller/sender who initiates any claim against the shipper. That is generally not the buyer/recipient's responsibility.

So, all is well after a stressful ordeal. Lots of lessors learned. I was glad that I got the official weight from a FedEx counter, otherwise FedEx could have claimed that my weight (using my scale at home) was not correct. I also was glad I added the "Declared Value". Declared Value, as most of you know, if not insurance exactly, it is the maximum liability FedEx is responsible for IF they are found to be at fault. But, if there is NO Declared Value, the maximum default FedEx is liable for, regardless of fault, is $100. Regardless of the claim amount, it seems to be quite the task to prove FedEx is at fault. You really have to have your paperwork ready and be prepared for a fight. Take it as high as you can, despite denials on lower levels. Lastly, be sure to keep the packaging if possible. I have read that this is common during damaged item claims, but apparently missing items as well.

I hope no one ever has to go through this, but if you do, I hope some of the tips above will help.

Stay shooting my friends.

Jason
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 9 users

  • Locked
7D Mark II ?

Hey Guys,
I am new here and looking for some help. I have a 6D Mark II, it's a great full frame and all around good camera.
I been shooting a little of never thing over the last years landscape, outdoor portraits, birds, wildlife, indoor/ outdoor sports and air shows. I really like shooting air show's old war birds flying or static. So I been looking hard at the 7D Mark II corp-sensor, 10 frame a second and 65 focus point. I am not sure to purchase an 7D Mark II at the lower price or wait for a 7D Mark III. I am thinking the 7D Mark II would do a better job on the flying aircraft with a 1.6 corp factor and it's better focus system vs the 6D Mark II. I would use the 6D Mark II as a second body with a 16/ 35 L lens for static planes. I would appreciate your feedback and reconditions.

5DayDeal Video Creators Bundle 2019 giveaway has launched, $10,000 in prizes to be won

The 5DayDeal Video Creators Bundle for 2019 giveaway has launched, one week ahead of the bundle itself and there are over $10,000 in prizes to be won.
Entering is simple, just head on over to 5DayDeal for your chance to win many great prizes. 5DayDeal is the provider of the best learning tools for photographers and videographers out there, there is no commitment required to enter the giveaway.

Here’s a list of what you can win:



Sponsor:
Description:


Vegas
VEGAS Pro 16


Hurlbut Visuals
Annual Gold Memberships


Promo
1yr Subscription to the Annual Basic Plan


Wipster
1yr Subscription to the Small Agency 50GB plan


Vegas
VEGAS Pro 16


5DayDeal
Zookki (Accessories Kit for GoPro)


Promo
1yr Subscription to the Annual Basic Plan


Wipster
1yr Subscription to the Small Agency 50GB plan


Spiffy
Spekular Core Kit


Vegas
VEGAS Pro 16


5DayDeal
Rode...

Continue reading...

Canon’s roadmap for 2019, included an EOS R camera that no one is expecting? [CR2]

We have been told by a source with a pretty good track record (but not perfect) what we can expect the rest of the way from Canon in 2019.
First up, it’s not a secret anymore, but we’re going to get the Canon EOS 90D, a camera that will apparently replace both the EOS 80D and the EOS 7D Mark II. With the latter line being killed off by Canon.
We’re told to expect an announcement near the end of August.
Apparently, a new EOS M body will come at the same time. It has been described to use as “very well specced” and “aggressively price”, with Canon wanting to show that the EOS M lineup isn’t dead. No specifications were provided to us.

No other EOS M cameras or lenses are scheduled for 2019.
What about the EOS R system?
The same source tells us that a new EOS R camera is coming later in 2019 and that it is a “head scratcher”...

Continue reading...

Rest well Canon EOS 7D series [CR2]

We’ve mentioned a few times previously that there would be no follow-up to the EOS 7D Mark II. We’re again hearing more about the demise of the EOS 7D series in favour of an EOS R solution. We may be beating a dead horse a bit here.
Will it be an APS-C EOS R?
We have been told that a few dealers and distributors are a bit worried about what Canon has in store for the replacement to the popular EOS 7D Mark II, as those buyers also buy lenses, more than EOS 80D buyers do. Canon has apparently told a couple of dealers that this concern will be addressed sometime later in 2019.
There has also been talk that an EOS R replacement for the EOS 7D Mark II will require the RF mount to meet target focusing speed and accuracy. Apparently, there’s more to come with the RF mount that has yet to be revealed to the world. We were given no additional insight into what we haven’t been told.
We expect an EOS 80D replacement to come sometime in 2019 that may...

Continue reading...

RF Trinity Len Sizes?

Anyone who has been to these photo shows can you confirm the size of the trinity RF Lenses? Are they the same size as their EF Counterparts? I tried putting a 24-70mm and 16-35mm on a EOS R and with the adapter the size is just huge. Hoping that the RF Lenses will be the same size or less so it would balance more with the need of an adapter. I can't tell from images of videos of what the size (length/width/diameter) of them are. Will the 15-35mm, 24-70mm, and 70-200 be interal zoom or external zoom?

This website has the patent and varying lens lengths. https://www.canonrumors.com/patent-lots-of-optical-formula-lens-patents-for-the-rf-mount/

This is a quote taken from the length of the 15-35mm. There are three sizes what do they mean?

  • Whole length of the lens 135.05mm 125.84mm 125.33mm
What do the different numbers mean?

When to go mirrorless vs DSLR - a Canon Ambassadors opinion

From a Canon CPS Newsletter:

Canon article about Canon Ambassador Richard Walch, action sports photographer, and his opinion on when to use what.
For me the best images are spontaneous, and the EOS R gives you stunning full-frame quality in a package that's super portable. But you can't forget Canon has worked on the EOS DSLR range for 30 years. They are super reliable and built tough. So now I have a choice.

Have a nice read

Using the canon R and the BG-E22 vertical grip VERTICALLY with touch-drag

Hey gang,

Just picked up the BG-E22 battery grip to mainly provide extra battery power for when you shoot with Wi-Fi transfer on. Secondly to help with the 70-200 balance and vertical shooting.

Regarding touch drag, I had it mapped to the top right quadrant when I shot before the grip.

Heres the problem: when shooting with the vertical grip VERTICALLY, the touch drag is STILL mapped to the top right, except when it’s vertical it end up being located on the top left...the farthest point from my thumb. It’s still operates like I was holding the camera as I would without the vertical grip; by the orig handle.

To equate this with the 5d3/4, the vertical grip comes with an additional joystick on the vertical grip, to essential recreate the same focusing ability when you use the grip vertically.

Since the canon R doesn’t come with a joystick, the touch-drag is it’s primary focusing system. By not providing a solution for touch dragging while using the battery vertically, its the same as if the 5D vertical grip didn’t provide a joystick.

SOLUTION:

Firmware update to alter the “TOUCH & DRAG AF SETTING” submenu “ACTIVE TOUCH AREA” to include and option to rotate the equivalent desired selection when the camera is vertical AND has a vertical grip attached.
In other words, if the R without the grip has the top right quarter of the screen mapped, when you use it vertically with your hand on the vertical grip, it’s still mapped to the top right,. However since the camera is being grip vertically with the BG-E22, the ACTIVE TOUCH AREA is effectively the top LEFT now.

Idealy, canon should make the ACTIVE TOUCH AREA include a second ACTIVE TOUCH AREA selection when the BG-E22 grip is attached AND the camera is in its vertical position. This is probably more critical if you have the position method being set to ABSOLUTE.

INTERM SOLUTION:

If you use the upper right (or any quadrant) AND use RELATIVE positioning method, set it from TOP RIGHT to RIGHT, that way the “top right” of the screen is still active when you hold the camera vertically with the BG-E22 attached.
I hadn’t seen this covered in any reviews so I thought I’d post it.

Any thoughts

Patent: RF mount super telephoto lenses

It looks like Canon is indeed working on their RF mount super telephoto optical formulas. We were told a couple of days ago that an RF 500mm f/4L IS would be the first super telephoto lens launched for the EOS R system.
A USPTO patent has appeared that shows optical designs for an RF 400mm f/2.8L IS, RF 500mm f/4L IS and an RF 600mm f/4L IS.
Canon RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Focal length: 392mm
F number: 2.9
Angle of view: 3.16°
Image height: 21.64mm
Entire lens length: 360mm
Backfocus: 31mm

Canon RF 500mm f/4L IS USM

Focal length: 490mm
F number: 4.12
Angle of view: 2.53°
Image height: 21.64mm
Entire lens length: 412mm
Backfocus: 33mm

Canon RF 600mm f/4L IS USM

Focal length: 588mm
F number: 4.12
Angle of view: 2.11°
Image height: 21.64mm
Entire lens length: 476mm
Backfocus: 33mm

Continue reading...


The first supertelephoto for the RF mount to be an RF 500mm f/4L IS [CR1]

We were told that development for RF mount super telephoto lenses is underway and that internal documents show that an RF 500mm f/4L IS USM will be the first super telephoto lens for the RF mount.
In the past, we’ve also been told that an RF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM was also under development, though we have yet to see any RF related patents for super telephoto lens design.
Canon tends to announce super telephoto lenses in pairs, so an RF 300mm f/2.8L IS and RF 500mm f/4L IS being announced alongside each other wouldn’t be a surprise.
No timeline was given for such lenses, and I wouldn’t think RF mount super telephoto lenses would come until we get that EOS-1D level EOS R body, which is still a ways away.
Thanks Dr Grammar

Continue reading...

Industry News: Fujifilm announces the GFX 100, a 102mp medium format camera

Press Release:

100+ megapixel sensor in a 55mm diagonal length large format offers highest resolution in the history of mirrorless cameras
Fast, accurate autofocus with the world’s first phase detection system, 4K video capability, and in-body image stabilization in a large sensor format1.

Valhalla, New York, May 23, 2019 – FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation today announced the upcoming release of its flagship GFX100 mirrorless digital camera, incorporating a newly-developed 102 megapixel (MP), 55mm diagonal length large format image sensor that is designed to deliver image clarity and capability previously unheard of in the photography and video industries.
The GFX100 features several ‘world firsts’ for a large format camera with an image sensor larger than the 35mm (full-frame) format: including its 102MP back-side illuminated sensor (BSI), in body image stabilization (IBIS) and on-board phase detection hybrid auto-focus (AF) with near 100% coverage. In addition to...

Continue reading...

10 Min Film shot on EOS R - Highly Impressed with this Camera for Video

Login to view embedded media
Recently completed this with the EOS R. This was my first real video project I've shot and cut apart from a smaller 2-3 minute trailer I cut a year ago using the Canon 1DX2.

I'm very impressed with the R. This was shot with the 4k 10 bit C Log out at 24fps to an Atomos Ninja V, recording in ProRes 422, NOT ProResHQ. I did nothing to the grading of the interview shots apart from mild white balance correction on one or two of the girls as we had a rising sun coming through the studio window as a key light. Audio for interviews was captured on a Rode NTG-3 and Tascam DR-60D with the line output fed into the EOS R. I goofed the audio settings a bit. Lesson learned for the future, but no reflection on the gear. Just minor operator error as this entire thing thing was shot in relative haste due to time constraints. I plan to do a BTS video with it in the near future for more detail.

I can't say enough how impressed I am with this camera for video. I haven't even taken a still frame with it yet LOL.

I've been shooting stills at this dance school for several years, and the subjects in this film I've known since they were little kids. SO it's a special one for me. That said, the last 3 mins bring it home with a huge montage. Hope ya'll enjoy it!

BTW, Here's one of the stills I just shot on the 1DX Mk II this past weekend for the 2019 Recital .... 30 foot stage, 25 foot 4K motion graphic LED wall behind dancers with intelligent LED lighting moving and color changing constantly with dancers flying through the air while I'm trying to guess what is about to happen next and where to point the lens. About the most difficult shooting environment you can imagine......

Attachments

  • NADREC19-13848.jpg
    NADREC19-13848.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 239
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Canon 5D mark IV + EF 35 mm F/1.4L II USM autofocus problems

I have a question about autofocus in 5DM4. I mean not LiveView focusing. I have problem with refocusing during session of shots. In LifeView the lens focus perfectly. My test step: I put the camera on tripod -> focusin on really contrast image (test chart by Focal) using central focusing dot. Distance between camera and target - 50. For my lens it it 3550 = 1750 mm. For shot use remote shutter release. And if i put the autofocus button, some time lens refocusing. And not always return to it initial place -> result: back or front focus. 2 of 10 attempts failed. In LifeView mode lens focusing perfectly without any refocusing.
I've tried to colibrate lens using Reikan Focal software. AF auto colibration works ok. But result for focus consistency - 2 of 10 shots failed.
How can i determine where is a problem? Camera of lens?
In real life shots i think the problem is worse. May be it's my fault...

Three new RF prime lenses coming in early 2020 [CR2]

We were told that three new fast L primes will be announced for the RF mount in early 2020. They include an RF 24mm f/1.4L USM and an RF 135mm f/1.8L along with an undisclosed dedicated macro lens which will be a “first of its kind macro lens”, though no details of what that means was given. I wouldn’t read too much into the latter.
The three new lenses are scheduled to be announced before CP+ in 2020, but as always, take lens scheduling with a grain of salt.
A lot more lenses are planned for 2020, we could see as many as 8 new RF lenses in 2020.

Continue reading...

Industry News: Fujifilm GFX 100 specifications leak, 100mp medium format camera on the way

Nokishita has leaked the specifications for the upcoming Fujifilm GFX 100, a 120mp camera they’re adding to their medium format GFX line which includes the original GFX 50S and the more compact GFX 50R.
The Fujifilm GFX 100 should be announced in a couple of days.
Fujifilm GFX 100 Specifications (Google translated):

Equipped with a backside illuminated CMOS sensor with 120 million pixels
High-speed image processing engine “X-Processor 4”
Achieves high-speed AF with up to twice the speed of the current model and excellent in moving object tracking
3.78 million image plane phase difference pixels placed on the entire surface of the image sensor
The accuracy of “face and pupil detection AF” has dramatically improved

In addition to face detection of objects farther away, it is also possible to achieve high followability even when the face turns sideways or is blocked by an obstacle.


Equipped...

Continue reading...

Canon posts RF lens control ring modification information

Canon has finally released information about their RF lens control ring modification that was announced alongside the EOS R last year.
The service is a reasonable $79 USD. This service would likely benefit some video shooters. There’s no mention of what it would cost to put a modified lens back to its stock form.

From Canon USA:
What is the Control Ring’s Clicking Sound Modification Service?
Canon’s control ring’s modification service offers RF lenses and Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R owners the opportunity to remove/reapply the control ring’s clicking sound.
Why might this be needed?
The click action of the control ring allows the user to have a sense of how much it is being turned. However, if used during video shooting, the sound of the control ring operation may be recorded.
Pricing



Model
Price*


RF Lenses
$79.99


Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R
$59.99



*Tax and freight fee are NOT included *All pricing is subject to change

Continue reading...

The FINAL DEATH of DSLR cameras with moving mirrors!

DSLR Cameras are NOW DEAD --- PERIOD !!!!!!!

As per other users who have espoused that DSLR will bounce back (i.e. see Ricoh's suggestion that Mirrorless will bounce back!),I say they TRULY are a dying breed.

Article Link:
https://petapixel.com/2019/05/20/ri...oters-will-switch-back-to-dslrs-in-1-2-years/

I think Ricoh and others have forgotten about OLD TECHNOLOGIES being used in NEW WAYS to completely and utterly eliminate mirrors in DSLR systems! For this new(ish) and COMPLETE REPLACEMENT of mirrors in digital cameras, what needs to be done is the use of CHROMOGENIC MATERIALS coated onto the micro-lenses which are placed over each photosite in all modern CMOS image sensors. It's called Smart-Glass!

A Smart-Glass coating that can switch from FULLY OPAQUE to fully transparent within two milliseconds to mere microseconds is the ULTIMATE in electronic shutter technology! Titanium Trioxide and Zirconium Dioxide coatings a good starting point and even Pyrenes with Organic Sulphur compounds poly(2-acylamido 2-methyl propane sulfonic acid) (PAMPS) will work for this:

See these links for more information:

Photochromism:

Electrochromism:

Chromogenic Polymers:

Smart Glass:

The FASTEST CHEAP-TO-MANUFACTURE smartglass i've heard of so far, is less than one-half-millisecond in change-over time from clear to opaque which is about 1/2000th of a second shutter speed which will be PERFECT for most MILC and Smartphone cameras!

AND if you're REALLY into super-speed shutters, then I suggest Polarized Lead Lanthanum Zirconate Titanate (PLZT) which is currently used on the U.S.'s B2 Bomber fleet's windows which can turn FULLY OPAQUE in mere MICROSECONDS after a "Nuclear Flash" to protect the eyes of its pilots from blinding light. This gives us about 1/100,000th of a second shutter speeds which SHOULD BE more than enough for sports/action/wildlife photographers!

DSLRs like the Canon 1DxMk2 or Nikon D5 are DEAD DEAD DEAD !!!

We can now make a FULLY GLOBAL SHUTTER CAMERA using Electrochromic Smart Glass which switches to BRIGHT WHITE or DARK BLACK in microseconds. This means the CURRENT line-by-line CMOS scanning techniques can be used but with a GLOBALLY ACTIVATED electrochromic shutter that will reduce and even fully ELIMINATE the temporal artifacts (rolling shutter) of modern mirrorless cameras!

By coating the above surface or underneath of the microlenses usually put on top of each image sensor's photosites, and sending an electric charge of a specific polarity and/or voltage level, the colour change effect can be controlled easily enough that such a system is now PRACTICAL for widespread adoption. In fact, we can put this on the LENSES themselves instead of onto the sensor so we can create fancy neutral density filters, colour filters, cookie cutouts, etc. without limitations of ANY camera body. This means the LENSES themselves can have electronic shutters and built-in neutral density filters of ANY number of desired stops!

Since photo-site-based electrohromic coatings can get electrically charged from each photosite individually, you can address each pixel individually to allow for CUSTOM shutter speeds and shutter transparency levels on ANY separate area of an image sensor which means you can make neutral density filters of ANY desired grade or transparency level, make cookie cutouts (for cinema use!), variable colour graduated filters, and even user-defineable REAL WORLD star and lens flare filters embedded onto a sensor OR into the lens body itself!

And cost-wise, it could be NOW DONE for between $25 to $100 dollars U.S. PER LENS or PER CAMERA SENSOR!

Long live ELECTROCHROMIC SHUTTERS !!!

DSLR IS NOW DEAD !!! Mirrorless Forever !!!!!


P.S. The ideas and products described above are NOW fully and freely open source to distribute and manufacture under the licence terms of the GNU GPL-3 2019 terms for hardware and software systems and all their designs and source code!
.

Ricoh predicts DSLRs will bounce back

Interesting story on Imaging Resources. Ricoh apparently believes the fascination with mirrorless will fade and DSLRs will make a comeback in a few years.

Hiroki Sugahara: Currently, mirrorless is a newcomer, so of course many users are very interested in the new systems, they want to use [them]. But after one or two years, some users who changed their system from DSLR to mirrorless come back to the DSLR again.

My opinion is that both formats have their advantages and until one can claim all the advantages of the other format with no compromises, both will co-exist side-by-side, possibly for decades. Be aware that the headline is a bit deceptive, as it references medium-format DSLRs, while the actual interview references all DSLRs.
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Patent: Zoom tilt-shift lenses

A patent uncovered by Northlight shows the optical formulas for zooming tilt-shift lenses has appeared over at the USPTO.
The patent appears to mention two separate and interesting tilt-shift lens technology.
The first, the patent shows two internal shift modules. This would help to maintain image quality when tilting the lens. The patent shows a 50mm f/4 design with the two shift modules.
The second part of the patent shows off new zooming tilt-shift lens designs.
Both a  24-100mm f/4 and a 30-80mm f/4 are included as embodiments.
Canon TS-E 24-100mm f/4 embodiment:

Focal length: 24.74mm – 49.55mm – 99.94mm
F-number: 4.13 – 4.31 – 4.42
Half angle of view: 41.17° – 23.59° – 12.21°
Image height: 21.64mm – 21.64mm – 21.64mm
Total lens length: 159.00mm – 174.75mm – 200.33mm
BF: 43.99mm – 55.44mm – 69.75mm

Canon TS-E 30-80mm...


Continue reading...


Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB