I'm planning to buy a 90D for a trip in early December. From what I can tell, Black Friday sales are usually limited to Tn/Tni models rather than xxD models, and they usually include bundled lenses that I don't want. Is that right? Should I buy now and maximize my time getting used to the camera before I travel or should I wait and see if there are bargains to be had?

Thanks, all.

Hi All,
I am a returning Canon user after 15 year.
In our business my wife is the photographer, me the nerd and videographer and shooting stills also when we have 2 gigs at the same time.
Bought the EOS R because my wife has a hate-hate relationship with our Sony A7 III, and she seemed to get much better along with the EOS R.

We shoot mostly moving subjects, so use Servo with either Tracking and Eye AF or 1-Point. Our Sony A7 III or our Fuji X-T3 use absolute priority when metering on the focused face / eye, even 1-point AF is using priority on the focusing point, and it functions extremely well. In the very very rare cases when I can use single point metering, and then those cameras use the focus point exclusively for metering.
The EOS R seems to miss a lot with the metering, especially with on-camera flash (with shutter speed, aperture and ISO selected manualy and using E-TTL II) . Same subject shot 3 times in a row with same settings has following results: 1 overexposed (by at least 1 EV), 1 underexposed (by at least 1.5 EV) and 1 which is acceptable. Outdoors in Av priority this happens less often, but it still happens.

My question is: am I missing a setting, is my camera broken, or is this normal for the EOS R.

I am an avid photographer. I make a living in movies. I direct, I cinematograph. But my real passion is photography.
I am very excited about the Canon 1dx3. I had 1dx2, 5d4 and lenses that got stolen. I want to rebuild my gear now but do not want to spend all the money I have (daughter's college loan!).

Although I really like the specs of 1dx3, the RF lenses attract me so much. The 50mm, the 85mm, 80-200mm.

So here is the confusion. Part of me feels I should forget about RF lenses and reinvest in DSLR. I tell myself the 50mm EF and 50mm RF can't be so different in real life. (But I know they are!). R does not compare with 1sx3 (But feel one day soon there will be a Canon mirrorless that will beat 1dx3).

Do any of you go through these thoughts? Any advice for me?

Has anyone got one yet and how does the bokeh compare to the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II? (Once it ships)

EOS 300 aka Rebel 2000 is all the camera you will ever need, it has features perfectly tuned down to all the essentials and nothing else. For a bit of extra features check out the EOS 300V aka Rebel Ti (viewfinder diopters, led-lit lcd, AF point activation indicator and metal mount). If you want to get really fancy you can look for EOS 300X aka Rebel T2 (which is basically the Elan 7 with the fancy functions hidden behind harder to access settings).
Tweakbox Appvalley https://vlc.onl/

These can be found for the low low price of $10, $20 and $30 respectively

Hey everyone,
So this is targeted at the ultra portable market. This is a great camera for folks who do not want to be bothered with a laptop and all of the other necessary steps needed to setup a camera like a ZWO or ASI.

Personally, I hike and do Milky Way landscapes. No computers or large EQ mounts or telescopes. I have gear to do astro in with an ultra portable but very capable camera, tripod, and tracker. cnv.to While I will not be buying this since I have Nikon kit, I have an astro-modded Z6 which is very similar to this. This is perfect for someone like me who needs to maintain ultra portability and enjoys the ease, functionality, etc of a DSLR/mirrorless over a dedicated astro cam.

Sometimes after we report something, it brings about some contradictory information soon after. Yesterday we reported that a source was “80% sure” than the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III would house a 24.x megapixel sensor.
This is what makes the rumor mill fun.
Shortly afterwards we were told by an anonymous source that the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III would actually sport a 20.1-megapixel sensor, which would mean it’s staying with about the same resolution as the EOS-1D X Mark II.  The source claimed to be “100% sure”.
If any of our known sources could corroborate this information one way or another, we’d appreciate it.
Remember, this a rumors site, contradictions in information happen a fair bit before the truth gets nailed down.

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Canon has released new firmware for its latest super-telephoto lenses, the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS III USM.
Firmware Version 1.1.2 incorporates the following enhancements:

Increases the manual focus speed when the manual focus speed switch is set to 1 or 2. *The speed when the switch is set to 3 (slowest speed) will be unchanged.
Improves the image stabilization effect during handheld shooting with a slow shutter speed when used with EOS 5D Mark IV, EOS 6D, or EOS R.

*Enables a full-time manual focus function during Servo AF when used with the EOS-1D X Mark II. The lens must be sent to the Factory Service Center in order for this function to be enabled.
If the lens’ firmware is already Version 1.1.2, it is not necessary to update the firmware.
The lens firmware version can be checked from the camera’s menu.
Download the firmware updates...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Every so often we see new big white lens patents, and this time we get another round of designs for the EF mount. There doesn’t appear to be anything here that shows these designs are for the RF mount.
Canon 400mm f/2.8

Focal length: 392.56 mm
F no: 2.90
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 371.16 mm
Back focus: 59.99 mm


Canon 500mm f/4

Focal length: 489.05 mm
F no: 4.12
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 411.08 mm
Back focus: 86.24 mm

Canon 600mm f/4

Focal length: 584.99 mm
F no: 4.12
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 476.28 mm
Back focus: 87.97 mm

Canon 800mm f/5.6

Focal length: 778.44 mm
F no: 5.80
Image height: 21.64 mm
Lens length: 489.01 mm
Back focus: 48.66 mm

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Before anyone pounces on me, this is a totally honest question. I do not know so asking: All those of you who have had a chance to shoot with Leica cameras, is the IQ of Leica better than Canon? This question is purely IQ related. I strongly suspect Canon shoots more 'easy'. Thank you.

https://solitaire.cam/With all the wailing and gnashing of teeth today about how the Sony a7III is so much better than the canon offering, my question is, wouldn't you still be better off getting the canon R to be able to use native glass and lenses like the 28-70 f2. Are those lenses possible on the sony mount? Canon glass always seems better than the competition and as everyone in any photography forum points out glass matters much more than the camera body.

Also as a landscape photographer the variable neutral density filter would encourage me to shoot with EF lenses and that adapter for some time. Besides this camera seems like a slight upgrade to the 5D at a price around or less than what the 5D sells for used.

Canon could have done more, and probably shhttps://9apps.ooo/ould have but they seem to rely on selling their system through their lenses rather than camera specshttps://solitaire.cam/

The biggest question people have about the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III is what the resolution of the all-new full-frame sensors will have.
We have been told multiple times that two different resolutions have been tested for the camera, but a good source is “80% sure” the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will come equipped with a 24.x megapixel sensor.
One of the select photographers that have had the chance to touch the EOS-1D X Mark III said no memory cards were allowed into test cameras, but that in the coming weeks they’ll be able to make images with the camera, so the resolution should be known for sure before the end of November.
We’re also told that the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III will be officially announced near the end of January 2020.

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

New camera resets the tone for the mirrorless market
November 6, 2019 – Building on the foundation established in 2015 with the visionary Leica SL-System, Leica Camera proudly introduces the Leica SL2, the storied brand’s new icon and next evolutionary step towards building the perfect all-purpose camera. By listening closely to the valued feedback of photographers and existing SL owners, Leica made many efforts to push the envelope of technological innovation and performance while respecting its heritage of design and legacy. In addition to a technical marvel of pure performance and unmatched build quality, the Leica SL2 is also a joyous experience to use with improved ergonomics and more comfortable grip married to the well-established, simplified three-button control layout, further unifying the Leica design language across multiple product lines. While cutting-edge new features such as in-body image stabilization unlocks newfound potential from legendary Leica M-Lenses...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Introducing the EOS Ra Camera with Specialized Filtration that Delivers Four Times Greater Hydrogen-alpha Wavelength (656.3 nm) Transmittance Compared to the EOS R
MELVILLE, N.Y., November 5, 2019 — In the words of poet Quintus Ennius, “No one regards what is before his or her feet; we all gaze at the stars.” Helping to gaze and capture the beauty of the stars and beyond, Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, today announced the company’s first full-frame mirrorless camera for astrophotography, the EOS Ra. This new camera was built off the EOS R system combining new features, such as four times greater transmittance of hydrogen-alpha (Hα) light of 656.3 nm compared to the original EOS R. For astrophotographers and hobbyists who enjoy capturing the detailed splendor of the night sky, the new EOS Ra will be an ideal camera to shoot with.
Preorder the Canon EOS Ra at Adorama

“Since the introduction of the EOS R...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Most of us know, love and appreciate Canon for its color and some of us attribute certain lenses more so than others. Of all my Canon red ring lenses and the other models as well, it’s ironic because I love the color of the 85 1.8 more so than any other glass. I also love the 135L and 70-300L.

What are certain lenses that stand out to you in terms of color rendition and richness?

I'm sure there is a method to the madness, but the old ef 135mm f/2L is worth 8 points on Canon Pro Services, while the new rf 85mm f/1.2L is worth only 6 points. The ef 24-70mm f/2.8L II is still worth 12 points!

And get this, the "kit" lens rf 24-105mm f/4L IS is worth 8 points...More than the 85mm!

Now, to be sure, this doesn't affect my life in the slightest. I'm just curious.

Insights?

Product images of the upcoming EOS Ra have appeared.  It’s very likely we’ll see this camera very shortly.
The EOS-Ra is an EOS R with a sensor modification that allows for h-Alpha wavelengths to pass through unimpeded by the IR cut filter that sits in front of the sensor.  Normally a stock IR Cut filter that digital cameras employ has around a 2-3 stop loss at the h-Alpha wavelength of 656.28nm.

Why is this good for astrophotography? Atypically emission nebulae emit this wavelength, and as well, the Sun’s atmosphere (take proper precautions if you try this!).  Letting more of this light to reach the sensor allows for better contrast and detail when it comes to nebulae and deep sky astrophotography.
Since the EOS Ra is modified to pass more light of the 656nm wavelength, white balance and colors will be a bit off for normal photography.  You can, however, use a hot mirror filter that screws on the front of your lens to correct the filtering for normal color photography...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

Here's a few shots of a really cool species of waterfowl in Australia.

Cheers!

Glenn

Lots more from Australia here -http://www.glennbartley.com/naturephotography/articles/Gallery%20-%20Australia2019.html

I've been getting more into video work lately, and I bought a used C100 MkI to do this. But the thing is, this camera definitely shows its age and lacks a bunch of features that the EOS R has. The C100 autofocus, even with dual pixel, is mediocre bordering on awful. You only get one AF area in the middle of the frame which may or may not actually focus on you want it to. And I supremely miss auto ISO that pretty much every stills camera for the last ten years has had.

So I'm considering moving over to the EOS R with an external recorder, probably the Atomos Shogun Flame. Is anyone using the EOS R for a lot of video work with an external recorder? How is it? Any problems with overheating during long, multi-hour video shoots?

If you are a Canon RF user, even if you aren’t interested in buying the M6 Mark II you should be interested in the reviews as it’s a precursor to better performance on the EOS RF mount.  The M6 Mark II gives us a glance into a future world of high performance Canon mirrorless cameras.
The M6 Mark II is quite the little camera, and I am certainly looking forward to it being in my greedy little hands soon.

Now onto the reviews.
The first one isn’t really a review, but a continuation of the Field Tests of the M6 Mark II by Imaging-Resource.
I just had to copy this image from Imaging-Resource, because I think it shows great things to come.  A 100% magnification of 30 (yes, I said THIRTY) fps auto focus. While not perfect, it’s actually quite excellent given the fps.  Consider that this is the same pixel density as an 83MP full frame sensor, and you can imagine that with more relaxed pixel density shown by a 24 or 30MP full frame camera, it...

Click to expand...

Continue reading...

I had a great time earlier in the week, shooting a deer rut in North Yorkshire - the M6 Mk II/100-400mm Mk II/1.4x TC combo did a bang-up job (click for full-size images).


Red deer


Fallow deer


Red deer


Red deer




Red deer, getting a move on. The camera locked on really well (Zone AF) - these are only two of a sequence, all perfectly focused.


Fallow deer

Red deer

I know that most of these are relatively static shots, but I'm really impressed by the sharpness and detail the camera/lens combo is capable of.

This is about the EOS R. I am using the latest firmware. I am trying to reduce the time or disable the image preview in the viewfinder after taking the shot. I remember there was some settings that sort of reduces the time it freezes my viewfinder. Or may be I am dreaming. Any one know how to fix this annoying issue?

Canon just added 24fps via firmware. Is it also possible for them to add autofocus to their 120fps mode? Is it likely that they would?

I was stoked about 120 but no autofocus is such a buzzkill.