• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

580EX-II strange failure

Anyone seen fail like this:

ETTL -mode: It flashes seemingly, but screen is basically black (as it would be with same settings without flash)
M-mode: it illuminates decent amount, but any power 1/128 to 1/1 look same brightness

Tried on 2 bodies, same behavior. Tried my 430EX backup, it worked just fine on ETTL mode too. So something with the 580.

Also when flashing (the 580), it doesn't make the normal high pitch charging sound. I'm wondering if the capacitor died or something.

Anyone had similar failure? Know what part might be broken? I know how to open and fix stuff, so I'm planning to open before buying a new one, but it'd help if someone had tips on where to look. I'm guessing the flash during ETTL is the pre-flash, but actual flash is out. The the M-mode might be illuminating at pre-flash brightness maybe?

Canon Photo Papers

Just curious as to what your favorite Canon photo paper might be, if any?

I have tested many papers from many manufacturers on my Epsons (3800 and P-6000) and have pretty much settled in on Moab Juniper Baryta (Luster) and Moab Entrada Natural (Matte).

But I also have a Canon Pro-100 that I tinker around with. So far the only Canon paper I have used is the Premium Luster. It's okay but I'm looking for something better. I could always go with the Moab papers in the PRO-100 but thought I'd ask about Canon papers.

Again, I'm just curious as to what your favorite Canon photo paper might be?

Zeiss Batis 135mm f/2.8 Review | Dustin

Hello all.

I’ve published the written and video reviews today of the Batis 135mm.

Text Review: http://bit.ly/batis28135DA
Video Review: http://bit.ly/Batis28135YT
Image Gallery: http://bit.ly/batis28135IG

I had to borrow a Sony a7R II to do this review, but it was enough to make me very jealous of getting autofocusing, image stabilized Zeiss glass. Now if only that Sony body were more fun to actually use!

Here's a few shots I've taken with the lens:

April Showers by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

K.I.S.S. by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

Slowly Vanishing Snow (Zeiss Batis 135mm f/2.8) by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

The 30 Year Evolution of Canon EOS Cameras Visualised

HTML:
<p>The Canon EOS system was introduced in March of 1987, and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTECduYfWnI">Digital Camera Warehouse</a> and compiled a visual history of all EOS SLR/DSLRs since the first EOS 650 35mm SLR all the way to the latest EOS 77D from Canon.</p>
<p>Over 70 EOS cameras have been released, how many have you owned?</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon 5Dmk4 compared to the 5Dmk3 for Wildlife photography

Just completed a short video discussing some key differences that I have found whilst shooting wildlife with the 5Dm4 and the 5Dmk3, both of which I own.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eWocvAo2EA

Whilst I have not found that there is any one aspect of performance that is radically upgraded between the two cameras, (aside from Live View shooting of course which is so much better on the new one), there are so many small advances and improvements that, the 5Dmk4 just does the job better. Of the improvements, I find the better image quality and improved low light capability perhaps the most useful, for my own wildlife shooting needs.
I am finding that it I can comfortably use iso 3200 anytime I need faster shutter speeds in low light, and even iso 6400 for print, with some noise reduction.

Dropped 600mm f/4 => send for checkup or not?

My father's Canon 600mm f/4L IS II USM was mounted on a 7D II on a Gitzo tripod. Suddenly, the tripod tipped over from a wind blow. The 7D II hit stones and the left mounting point for the camera strap is now bent against the side of the body. He doesn't care, as he only uses a Spider handstrap mounted to the tripod mount and the right strap mounting point of the camera.

The lens didn't fell on the rocks, but landed onto (soft) grass. The mount may have had an impact if the body hit ground first before the lens did, I don't know about that. There's no visual damage to the lens and it seems to function fine. No loss of sharpness can be detected in the photos and the autofocus still seems to function the same.

The question is: should he send it in for a checkup or not? Is there a chance of hidden damage from the drop that may give extra damage if not taken care of now?

Attached is a pic of the damage to the body. The lens has no visual damage on the outside.

Thanks!
Niels

Attachments

  • image1.JPG
    image1.JPG
    523.2 KB · Views: 146

5d3 Vs 5d4

This is a genuine question, am not wasting your time. If I am not interested in 4k video on this camera or the extra 1fps, what advantages does Mark 4 offer over Mark 3?

I currently have 1dc and 1dx2 but am looking to buy a travel camera which is lighter. I thought long and hard about Fuji Xt2 but am thinking not mainly because my travel photography involves low light situations and crop sensor is not ideal then. Also I will have to invest in new lenses etc.

So thinking 5d4 or 5d3 (Not 6D as I want good focus points). So what advantages of 5d4 over 5d3 in my situation please? Appreciate. Since I have the 2 1D series, I want to save few bucks on a camera which will not be used so much.

Canon Profit set to Double

Preliminary information about Canon's upcoming financial announcement indicate that profits will double for the first quarter of this year.

As I've noted before, Canon has invested heavily in Surveillance and Medical imaging, and its paying off. Camera sales in Asia are also strong. The surveillance and medical imaging fields are growth industries with much larger profits than the camera business. Canon's Image helps them to make sales in those areas, and they have bought into the best companies in the business.

Even though the big profit is not from camera sales, canon is not abandoning cameras, they remain a imaging company. Having the financial resources to invest in imaging R&D will benefit new cameras in the future.


"TOKYO -- Canon probably saw its group operating profit roughly double on the year in the January-March quarter to about 80 billion yen ($733 million), thanks to successful acquisitions and strong overseas sales of cameras and printers."Sales apparently grew 20% to just over 950 billion yen. Official quarterly results are due out Wednesday.
http://asia.nikkei.com/Markets/Tokyo-Market/Canon-s-profit-likely-doubled-on-Toshiba-unit-purchase

Frustrated with filters and step down rings.

I need some good advice. I use B+W filters and B+W step down rings. I only have 2 step down rings: 72-77mm and 77-82mm. I still need a 72-82mm, but only because of the filters I own and having to get them all to work together. I'd opt for all 82mm filters and just have two rings, but that isn't how things worked out since I got the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II. It's 82 mm filter size kinda messed up my long term plans.

Here's the problem: Filters getting stuck to the rings. I do have the wrenches, but what a PIA that is! The problem is especially prevalent with circular polarizers.

It there a case to be made for having a set of filters for each lens size (Expensive)? Or do you guys go at it like I am attempting... get all 82mm filters and just use the step down rings? This doesn't always allow a hood to be used.

If just using the step down rings, do any of you lubricate them with glycerin soap or anything?

Sometimes I don't realize how tight I get them, I guess, even though I do make an effort to not crank down on them. It seems "finger tight" is sometimes too tight. Once they are stuck, they are really stuck until I get home to the wrenches. By then, I've missed the shot I wanted.

It seems that step down rings are always the problem. My filters have never got stuck on the lens... the rings either.

Thanks!

135 f2.0 L Focusing noise, send it back?

Hi guys!

I just got my brand spanking new, produced december 2016. But the focusing noise is more more squeaky and scrapy compared to my friends 135m, and of the 5 I hav e had earlier, and not one single of the 150+ enses I've owned has had this noise.

Does it need breaking in, is it normal for an old usm in a new lens to behave like this? It does focus spot on at afma 0 and it locks safely and with great certainty.

Attachments

Sigma 135 f1.8 Art; Inconsistent AF

It may be that Sigma is after me and is determined to keep me away from their lenses ...

Even though I made myself a promise, not to get another Sigma lens, I fell for the initial reports from the likes of Dustin Abbott, about AF improvements and I picked up the 135/1.8 yesterday.

I initially tried it around the house, prior to run it through Focal. Some decently in focus, others totally off. I have seen similar from other lenses in the past. When AFMA is off, AF may be inconsistent. So, today, I gave it a run through Focal. And what a depressing experience that was. On all runs the red dots were all over the place. On the 5DIV I got a +12 on run 1, +8 on run 2, -2 on run 3 and unable to determine on run 4. I then switched to the 5DSR and got a +12 on run 1, +2 on run 2 ... and then I gave up.

I then took it on the 5DSR outside, to test some more. I just chose a value of 7 (in between 12 and 2) and used various focusing points. The results, unfortunately, was very inconsistent. I shot the same targets several times, most of them on a tripod, I repeated manually turning the lens out of focus, not by much and always towards minimum focus distance. The result was front focus on one, back focus on the next. I also used the LensAlign setup and got the same result.

Needless to say, this just confirms my previous experiences with the 35/1.4 and 50/1.4 Art lenses, of which I went through several copies of each. I´ll take it back to the shop next week and I´ll ask them to do the AFMA for me. Fingers crossed, they can prove that I have done something wrong. I have my doubts though, considering all the AFMA runs I have been through over the years, with a significant number of cameras and Canon lenses.

So to those of you who bought this lens. Have you run it through FoCal? Have you tested for focus consistency? If you have a magic trick, please tell me.

Gear for August Eclipse

I'll be going to Oregon to view the solar eclipse in August. Initially I was planning on taking 5D Mark III with 100-400L II and 1.4 & 2.0 III Extenders, G3X and G1X (IR Modified). I will need to take 3 tripods and will use a gimbal with the 5DIII and ball heads with the others. Naturally I want to take pictures of the eclipse progression and therefore need to use a filter until the sun is fully eclipsed. I will be using the Lee Big Stopper and Little Stopper stacked together and have tried this combination on both the 5DIII and G3X with full sun and it appears to work fine. I've taken test shots of the sun to get a starting point for manual settings, but will have to refine them just before the eclipse starts. I can't see any difference between the pictures of the full sun from the 5DIII and the G3X, which is probably not surprising given there's not much detail on the full sun (both showed a few sunspots, and they looked the same). If I want to use both cameras at the same time, I will have to get another filter, which is an added expense (looking at the Marumi 16.5 stop 77mm filter @USD125 @ B&H, but there's no ratings and it's special order (noncancelable and nonreturnable) - anyone used this?) I'm now wondering whether it is even worth taking the 5DIII if there's no real image quality difference between it and the G3X for this application. However, it would mean I'd be limited to 600mm rather than 800mm, but I suspect some of the corona at full eclipse may be cut off at 800mm (I'm not sure on this). I don't know if the lack of apparent image quality difference between the two cameras would also apply to the corona when the sun is fully eclipsed. I'm driving, so it's not a big deal to pack the extra equipment, but it means exposing more equipment to loss or theft. However, I also don't want to fall into the trap of spending the entire time adjusting equipment and shooting pictures and failing to just sit back and enjoy the 2 minute (or less) spectacle of full eclipse. I'd appreciate receiving advice from those of you with experience in shooting solar eclipses. Also, I have been advised to only use live view to set up the shots and to not look through the viewfinder (even with the filters on). So far I have heeded this advice, but suspect it is an overly cautious approach. I have an angle finder and think it may be useful for this application (let's not restart the flippy screen debate here). Your thoughts?

Attachments

  • G3X at 600mm.jpg
    G3X at 600mm.jpg
    534.6 KB · Views: 217
  • 5DIII at 560mm.jpg
    5DIII at 560mm.jpg
    633.3 KB · Views: 205
  • 5DIII at 800mm.jpg
    5DIII at 800mm.jpg
    629.6 KB · Views: 249

Sony a9 Mirrorless Camera Now Available for Preorder

HTML:
<p>You can now preorder the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/off-brand-sony-announces-the-a9/">brand new Sony a9</a> mirrorless camera. Shipping is expected to happen closer to the end of May.</p>
<p>Lots of Canon shooters tend to use Sony’s full frame mirrorless cameras as part of their kit and that will probably continue with the a9.</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://bhpho.to/2pLdIJe">Preorder the Sony a9 Mirrorless Camera at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Announces Entries are Open for the 2017 New Cosmos of Photography 2017 Photo Competition

HTML:
<p><strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., April 20, 2017 </strong>– Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, is excited to announce today that its parent company, Canon Inc., has opened the worldwide submission entry period for its 2017 New Cosmos of Photography (40th edition) photo competition. This year’s contest seeks entries depicting new creative photographic expressions that provide a glimpse of the next frontier. Starting in 2015, the contest began to accept digital submissions (both stills and video), to encourage more original forms of photographic expression.</p>
<p>Entries for the 2017 New Cosmos of Photography will be accepted between today and June 8<sup>th</sup>, 2017 and the Excellence Award Selection Committee will meet in July to choose seven Excellence Award winners and fourteen Honorable Mention Award winners. Later, in November, the Grand Prize selection committee is scheduled to meet to select one Grand Prize winner from among the seven Excellence Award-winning entries.</p>
<p>The grand prize winner will receive 1 million JPY (Approximately $9176.00 US Dollars), a Canon EOS DSLR camera and the opportunity to hold a solo exhibit at the exhibition of the Tokyo Photographic Art Museum from October 21<sup>st</sup>– November 12<sup>th</sup>, 2017. Additionally, to encourage the continued pursuit of their creative endeavors, 2017 Excellence Award and Honorable Mention Award winners will also receive prize money and the opportunity to display their work at this year’s exhibition of winning entries.</p>
<p>For additional information about the New Cosmos of Photography competition, visit the New Cosmos of Photography homepage at: <a href="http://global.canon/en/newcosmos/" target="blank"><b>global.canon./en/newcosmos</b></a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Samyang Announces the VDSLR Cine 16mm T2.6 Lens

HTML:
<b>April 21st, 2017, Seoul, South Korea</b> – Global optics brand, Samyang Optics announce a new 16mm T2.6 cine lens, designed specifically for video shooting with uncoupled gear rings with T numbers. This launch adds one more lens to the existing 18 cine lenses for DSLR and mirrorless cameras.</p>
<p>Since 2012, Samyang Optics has released its cine lenses based on the needs of professional videographers. Satisfied with the image quality of Samyang lenses, videographers continuously requested for cine lenses and as an answer, Samyang launched cine lens line up.</p>
<p><!--more-->

This new launch expands the cine lens line up to a total of 19 lenses: 13 for DSLR cameras varying from 8mm fisheye to 135mm telephoto and 6 for mirrorless cameras varying from 8mm to 50mm.</p>
<p>Inheriting the renowned image quality of Samyang’s wide-angle lenses, the 16mm angle of view is commonly used by directors of photography around the globe for its versatile usage for wide-angled emotional scenes in film and videos. Along with the existing 14mm, 20mm and 24mm, this new lens will realise the delicate changes in the scenes.</p>
<p>As a ‘Total Imaging Solution’ optics brand, Samyang Optics now offers 51 lenses: 2 premium XP photo lenses, 2 autofocus lenses, 19 manual focus photo lenses, 19 cine lenses and 9 professional cinema lenses specifically under XEEN brand.</p>
<p>Launched to complete the Samyang cine lens line up, this new 16mm T2.6 will be available globally from June and will carry a suggested retail price of EUR 599.00. For more information, visit the Samyang social media channels.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sigma Unveils Two New Cine Prime Lenses; Adds New Product Options


HTML:
<em>Sigma introduces brand new Sigma Cine FF High Speed 14mm T2 and 135mm T2 Prime Lenses</em></p>
<p><strong>April 20, 2017</strong> – Sigma Corporation of America, a leading DSLR lens, camera, flash and accessory manufacturer, today announced its brand new Cine FF High Speed 14mm T2 and 135mm T2 prime lenses and new Cine Prime and Zoom product options.</p>
<p>Sigma is expanding its Cine Prime line to include two brand new lenses: the Sigma Cine FF High Speed 14mm T2 and the Sigma Cine FF High Speed 135mm T2. The high-performance Sigma Cine Prime product line, which now includes the following focal lengths and apertures – 14mm T2, 20mm T1.5, 24mm T1.5, 35mm T1.5, 50mm T1.5, 85mm T1.5 and 135mm T2 – is compatible with the latest full-frame camera sensor technology. Compact in design, the Cine Prime line offers outstanding optical performance and is ready for higher resolution shooting (up to 6K-8K). Both the 14mm T2 and 135mm T2, along with the previously announced Sigma Cine Prime and Zoom lenses, will be available for test-shooting at the Sigma NAB booth C11525.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>In addition to this expansion of its Cine Lens Prime line, Sigma is now offering customers the option to order Cine lenses in <strong>metric or imperial measurements</strong> as well as <strong>standard or full luminous paint on markings</strong>. Existing customers who wish to swap from one measurement system to the other can do so for a paid fee.</p>
<p>Also, Sigma is now offering its sought-after <strong>Mount Conversion Services</strong> for the Cine lens customers. The highly successful program ensures continued return on investment for customers, allowing them to convert their lenses to and from EF and E mounts.</p>
<p>You can read the full Sigma announcement including tech specs <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/hvmp8m3qxo9wrh8/PR_EN_SIGMA_cine_lens_0417.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a> as well as download the new Sigma Cine 14mm T2 and 135mm T2 product images <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3bvei77exa4vmxv/AAB173cvG0Luon8eXuhgO-qja?dl=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Headed to Copenhagen / Stockholm -- gear/location advice appreciated

We're off to Copenhagen and then Stockholm before too long. Nine days total between the two cities.

Per the usual, travel as a family is a stick-and-move sort of activity in which I am not afforded the luxury of chimping, scripting/posing shots, using a flash, or getting a second try at it. So I usually strip down my kit on these trips and go with 2-3 of the following lenses on my 5D3:

  • 16-35 f/4L IS
  • 24-70 f/4L IS
  • 28 f/2.8 IS
  • 35 f/2 IS
  • 50 f/1.4 (Canon)

Usually bring: BR strap, Gorillapod w/ballhead, UV and CPL filters, sometimes the lens hoods depending on space.

Usually leave at home: 600EX-RT, EF 40 pancake, 100L , 70-200 f/2.8L IS II and the 2x T/C, all my landscape gear

So, all that said, here are the questions:

1) For those that have been / have lived in either city, what locations did you find memorable as a photographer?

2) If you were to go with a two lens setup for the whole trip -- knowing my aversion to lugging heavy gear around on long treks through the city -- what would you choose for those locations, and why?

3) What single lens might you rent that isn't on the list above that might be a good move for me? If it helps, I trend towards fast wide/standard primes -- so the 35L II, 35 Art, 24L II, 50L come to mind. I'm game to other ideas, but good reliable AF is an absolute must for my needs.

Advice appreciated, thanks!

- A

Canon Studio Pro & Pro 100

I am attempting to create profiles using Canon Studio Pro using my own photos. I have been following the instructions, using the "Pattern Print", but I'm not convinced that I love the results. Of course, different photos have different colors in them, so what looks correct for one photo ends up not being 100% correct for another. Additionally, the "backlit" images on my computer monitors are a bit difficult to truly compare with the printed images.

I'm wondering if anyone has ever used something like a ColorChecker Passport to create printer profiles in PSP, and if that thought process is even valid. I'm thinking about using the following steps:

1. Use photo of CCP in LR to create a profile
2. Apply the profile to the photo in LR
3. Use the corrected photo in PSP for "Pattern Print"
4. Compare the printed pattern to the physical ColorChecker Passport

Anyone have any thoughts on my proposed method?

Opinion: What is a Rumors Site?

HTML:
I started this site 9 years ago, more as a joke than anything. I stole the idea from the likes of <a href="http://macrumors.com">macrumors.com</a> and <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/rumours.html">northlight-images</a>. It was never meant to be more than a fun place for me to write about current and coming camera gear, I never imagined it would explode to the level of popularity that it has.</p>
<p>However, it seems every year or two I have to remind a small (but loud) percentage of folks about what a “rumor” is.</p>
<blockquote>
<h3>ru·mor

ˈro͞omər/</h3>
<h3>noun

1. a story or statement in general circulation without confirmation or certainty as to facts:</h3>
</blockquote>
<p>With success comes responsibility, even if you haven’t asked for it.</p>
<p>We try to be correct with information 100% of the time, this is a lofty and completely unattainable goal. We are not CanonFacts.com or the New York Times or the BBC, we are Canon <em><strong>Rumors</strong></em>. No one is going to be correct 100% of the time, and you cannot treat anything you read as 100% correct, whether the writer had that intention or not.</p>
<p>We hear the latest in cliche words, “clickbait”, “fake news” & “altfacts” all come to mind. There is nothing at Canon Rumors that is intentionally any of those 3 things.</p>
<p>We are fine with criticism, and actually welcome it. However, if you’re going to be critical, please do so based on what we have written and not what others have written.</p>
<p><strong>What we do not control:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Things people send us. 95% of the stuff that appears in my inbox never appears on the site because I can generally confirm the information internally.</li>
<li>What others sites decide to publish. If another site wants to link one of our stories, that’s great but we do not seek it. They are running the risk of the rumor being untrue or partially untrue.</li>
<li>I have no control on how people read between the lines and then hit forums or social media and spread these things as “fact”. Things I never wrote appear places and then are taken as fact and then people are mad at us if it turns out to not be true.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What we do control:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Every post on the site is my responsibility and when it’s wrong, I’m wrong, and that bugs me.</li>
<li>The ratings we put on posts. This <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/crop-factor-change-for-4k-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv-included-in-coming-update-more/">latest firmware update post</a> we didn’t put [CR1] on it, as we should have. The post says “new source”, but it was our oversight that we didn’t rate it for whatever reason.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>How to make it better going forward?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Making sure we rate every post and we’ve put the rating system in the side bar of the site. I don’t like posting [CR1] stuff, but sometimes they can turn out to be true. I will make sure to better articulate that a rumor is unconfirmed and to take it for what it is.</li>
<li>All video related rumors are going to be vetted differently. I have lots of photography knowledge, but my videography knowledge is lacking. This latest firmware rumor would have probably ended up in the trashcan if I had passed it onto a couple of people prior to posting for evaluation.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks for reading my rant and visiting Canon Rumors. In the end we do this for fun and we hope you read it for fun.</p>
<p> </p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Product Advisory: EOS C300 Mark II/EOS C300 Mark II PL Malfunction with VPG130 CFast Card

HTML:
<p><em>Workaround for Malfunction During Use of VPG130 CFast Card</em></p>
<p>For EOS C300 Mark II/EOS C300 Mark II PL Digital Cinema Cameras equipped with firmware Version 1.0.6.1.00, we have confirmed a phenomenon in which, depending upon the usage conditions, the camera freezes when a VPG 130 CFast card is used simultaneously with a non VPG130 CFast card.</p>
<p>We are currently making preparations to correct this phenomenon with the release of a firmware update in mid-May. In the meantime, please use the method described in the workaround below.</p>
<p>We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused to customers, and we ask for your ongoing patience.</p>
<p><!--more-->

<strong>Phenomenon </strong>

When a VPG130 CFast card is used simultaneously with a non VPG130 CFast card the camera may freeze. If the camera freezes, even if the live view image is displayed, all buttons and switches, including the POWER switch, will no longer respond, and the footage will not be recorded on the cards. (The time code and the recording indicator may continue to work.)</p>
<p>The camera can be released from the freeze condition by detaching it from the power supply (or removing the battery)</p>
<p><strong>Workaround </strong>

If you experience this phenomenon please follow the steps below:</p>
<p>Detach the camera from the power supply or remove the battery.

Remove both CFast cards from the card slots.

Use two of the same type of CFast cards: Either VPG130 or non VPG130.

Note: If there is only one CFast card inserted, you may continue use with no issues.</p>
<p><strong>Affected Products </strong>

EOS C300 Mark II/EOS C300 Mark II PL Digital Cinema Cameras (with Firmware V1.0.6.1.00).</p>
<p><strong>Support </strong>

We are planning to release updated firmware in mid-May 2017.</p>
<p>If you have not already done so, please register the EOS C300 Mark II and EOS C300 Mark II PL. By registering, we will be able to notify you via email about future announcements.</p>
<p>This information is for residents of the United States and its five territories only. If you do not reside in the USA or its five territories, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB