Updated Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS Specifcations

HTML:
We have received a few more bits of information in regards to the soon-to-be-announced EF 85mm f/1.4L IS.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS Specifications:</strong> (New information in bold / weight and dimensions are approximates).</p>

<ul>
<li><strong>Minimum focusing distance : 85cm / 2.78′</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>EF 85mm f/1.2L II minimum focusing distance is 95cm / 3.12′</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Weight: 950g / 33.5oz</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>EF 85mm f/1.2L II weighs 1025g / 36.16oz</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Filter size: 77mm</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>EF 85mm f/1.2L II filter thread is 72mm</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Max diameter 88.6mm / 3.48″</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>EF 85mm f/1.2L II is 91.4mm / 3.6″ </em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Length: 105.4mm / 4.15″</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>EF 85mm f/1.2L II is 83.8mm / 3.3″</em></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>4 stop image stabilization</li>
<li>Flourine coating</li>
<li>1 moulded aspherical element</li>
<li>9 aperture blades</li>
</ul>
<p>We’re still waiting to confirm USD pricing as well as the exact announcement date and availability.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Video Footage of the 2016 Earthquake at Sony Kumamoto Sensor Factory

HTML:
<strong>From <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=137&v=jczAV862LhU">DPReview Youtube</a>:</strong></p>
<p>On April 16, 2016, disaster struck in Kumamoto in the Kyushu region of Japan. A series of earthquakes, including a magnitude 7.0 mainshock was struck beneath Kumamoto City where Sony’s sensor factory resides. A foreshock (warning) of magnitude 6.2 came approximately 2 days earlier, which did give the factory some time to evacuate; however, the damage to the carefully built, precision controlled and automated factory with clean rooms was devastating. Not to mention the impact of the lives of those in the region…</p>

<p>After buildings were deemed safe (there were many aftershocks), Sony factory members, including executive ones, went to work restoring the factory all by themselves with such diligence and dedication that they restored operations ahead of schedule. Whilst putting in place precautions that would lower the lead time from 3.5 months to 2 months were this to happen in the future.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Compare autofocus of the 6D2 to original 7D

It's hard or impossible to compare reviews from different times especially eight years apart. Could anyone who has used both the original 7D and the 6DII compare autofocus performance for me. The 7D was stellar 8 years ago and some reviews have been disappointed in the 6DII autofocus performance but what would it mean for me directly coming from an original 7D. Any help is appreciated!

Some Information About the EF 85mm f/1.4L IS [CR3]

HTML:
We’ve received a bit more information about the upcoming Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS.</p>
<p><strong>Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS Known Specifications:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>4 stop image stabilization (previously mentioned)</li>
<li>Flourine coating</li>
<li>1 moulded aspherical element</li>
<li>9 aperture blades</li>
</ul>
<p>We currently do not know the weight, dimensions, announcement date or how much this hotly anticipated lens is going to be.</p>

<p>We’re also going to <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/clarification-corrections-on-the-upcoming-new-lenses-from-canon-cr2/">put a [CR3] onto the tilt-shift lenses we’ve been reporting about</a>.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Review: Canon EOS 6D Mark II by TDP

HTML:
<p>The-Digital-Picture has completed their review of the Canon EOS 6D Mark II, and came away pretty impressed overall. While it’s not a perfect camera body, the image quality is great as far as noise and color go, but we’re all disappointed we didn’t get a dynamic range performance bump.</p>
<p><strong>From TDP:</strong></p>

<blockquote><p>The 6D Mark II did not impress me with its AI Servo AF capabilities, its dynamic range is only adequate and I’m not a fan of the 8-way multi-controller. But, the image quality benefits, especially color and noise levels, of Canon’s full frame CMOS sensors are big, while the footprint of the 6D II remains small – as does, probably most importantly, the relative impact on your wallet. Expectations were that the 6D Mark II would deliver very impressive image quality and rapidly hit the most-popular list. It has delivered on expectations. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-6D-Mark-II.aspx">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I still haven’t used the EOS 6D Mark II enough to give my final verdict to folks, but I do like the camera so far.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Another Confirmation on the Upcoming Canon Lenses & New Flash

HTML:
Nokishita has posted <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/clarification-corrections-on-the-upcoming-new-lenses-from-canon-cr2/">similar information about the upcoming 4 lenses from Canon</a>, along with a couple of added goodies.</p>
<p>Canon will announce the following new products soon. (Google Translated)</p>

<ul>
<li>EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM</li>
<li>TS-E 135mm f/4L Macro</li>
<li>The official name of the other two but unconfirmed, the focal length and F values 90mm f/2.8L and 50mm /f2.8L becomes. <em>(We’ve pretty much confirmed a TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro and a TS-E 90mm f/2.8L Macro.)</em></li>
<li>Lens hood “ET – 83E” “ET – 88” “ES – 84”</li>
<li>Macro twin light “MT-26EX”</li>
</ul>
<p>We do not have any information on pricing or availability of any of these four lenses. Since <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-85mm-f1-4l-is-usm-on-the-way-cr3/">we’ve known about the 85mm f/1.4L IS for quite some time</a>, we’re hoping availability comes swiftly after the announcement.</p>
<p> </p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Off Brand: Sony Aggressive in Becoming #2 in the ILC Market & More

HTML:
In an interview with <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2017/08/10/sony-says-clearly-aps-c-forever">Imaging Resource</a> (and others) Sony executives publicly says they’re after the #2 spot for ILC sales. Canon being the #1 and will likely remain there for the foreseeable future. However, this blogger thinks they need to take a few more risks in the coming years to reverse the perception that there’s no innovation in camera bodies going on at Canon.</p>
<p>While Canon appears to be committed to shareholder profits, Sony is taking a different approach for the moment to gain marketshare.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Please look at our vision, not where our profits come from.” said Mr. Tanaka</p></blockquote>
<p>Sony can afford to do this for the time being, though one day you do need to turn a profit of some kind.</p>
<p>Sony also feels the path to growth is not just by taking marketshare from others, but increasing the size of the overall market, which is obviously a big challenge in the current marketplace.</p>

<blockquote><p>A point made by several of the executives — and underscored by no less than Mr. Hiroshi Sakamoto — was that, as one of the true leaders* in the camera market, Sony has to grow by growing the overall market, not just by poaching market share from other players.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sony also remains committed to APS-C sensor products. While their full frame cameras seem to bring about the most discussion online, their APS-C line of cameras remains important to their overall strategy.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tanaka-san was very emphatic. Paraphrasing slightly, he said “APS-C is an important category for us. We’ll <em>never </em>quit APS-C!”</p></blockquote>
<p>Imaging resource also reports than Sony thinks it can achieve a 50% marketshare in the coming years, which would put them in Canon territory.</p>
<p>We should be hearing more about Sony and how they plan to take over the camera world in the coming weeks from other web sites who had the chance to visit with Sony in Japan.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Canon EF 11-24mm f4L vs Canon EF 16-35 f2.8 L III

I really do like shooting wide angle, and I am very satisfied with my Canon 16-35 f2.8 L III. It is absolutely amazingly sharp, even when pixel peeping on pictures taken with my 5Ds.

I do a lot of hiking in the Norwegian mountains, and this summer I occasionally found myself wishing that my 16-35mm lens could go wider - in particular when I was on spectacular viewing points.

Combined with GAS, and a savings account that allows for dreaming, I am now considering adding the 11-24 to my kit. I see however, that there are few rational reasons for doing so. My take is:

- the 16-35 is more flexible, both in aperture, and focal range
- the 16-35 is even better optically - about the same sharpness, but less chromatic aberrations
- the 16-35 is smaller and lighter
- when I need to go wider, I can often make panoramas

The main reason is see for buying the 11-24, would be beeing able to compose at wider angles, take those shots where panoramas is impossible, and the fun of having another lens. Not very good reasons for spending that kind of money...

However, does anyone have experience with both lenses? Do they supplement each other? What good reasons do you have for owning both lenses?

6dmk2 with 5dmk4 sensor; should we pay more for it?

If Canon want to survive in the entry-full-size camera market, Canon must make version of the 6 dmk2 with the sensor from the 5 dmk4 including 4K video and high DR, not in 4 years , but next year/ ASAP.

Would you pay more for this camera and how much?

I think Canon should lower the price right now for the current 6 dmk2 by 200 $ and ask $2250 for the <6 D mk2R> version, I would willingly pay for it.

Garret, the Netherlands

Stock Notice: Canon Cinema EOS C200B at B&H Photo

HTML:
<p>B&H Photo has the Canon Cinema EOS C200B in stock and ready to ship. This is the base level Cinema EOS C200, without all of the accessories.</p>
<p class="fs16 OpenSans-600-normal upper product-highlights-header">PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS</p>

<ul class="top-section-list" data-selenium="highlightList">
<li class="top-section-list-item">Super 35mm CMOS Sensor</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Dual Pixel CMOS AF Technology</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Dual DIGIC DV 6 Processors</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">4K DCI and UHD, 1920 x 1080</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">59.94/50/29.97/25/24/23.98p & 120p in HD</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">Canon RAW Light, MP4, MP4 Proxy</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">2 x XLR Audio Inputs</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">1 x CFast Card, 2 x SD Card Slots</li>
<li class="top-section-list-item">SDI, HDMI, Ethernet Connectors</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://bhpho.to/2vItz13"><strong>Canon Cinema EOS C200B at B&H Photo</strong></a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Warranty card needed for repairs?

I have a question, now I understand that grey market items are not "supposed" to be serviced by canon, yet in most cases they seem to do the warranty repairs on these. I purchased a new 5d Mark IV a while ago that came without a warranty card in the box. my question is, when canon repairs does do the warranty repairs on their items, is the warranty card needed, or just a proof of purchase?

Sigma Warns of Lens Aberration Correction Bug with Select Sigma Lenses and Canon EOS 6D Mark II, EOS

HTML:
As with <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/how-to-fix-weird-visual-behaviour-with-pairing-the-eos-1d-x-mark-ii-sigma-lenses/">most new Canon DSLR releases</a>, there are some third party lenses that may present the odd vignette when “Lens Aberration Correction” is turned on with various Canon DSLRs.</p>
<p><strong>From Sigma:

</strong>We have found that some SIGMA interchangeable lenses for CANON are not fully compatible with CANON EOS 6D Mark II released on August 4th, as well as EOS 9000D (77D), EOS Kiss X9i (Rebel T7i) and EOS Kiss X9 (Rebel SL2).</p>
<p>When certain lenses are attached to these cameras and the “Lens aberration correction” function on these cameras is set to “Enable” for Live View shooting, an error would occur.</p>
<p>Please set the “Lens aberration correction” function of the cameras to “Disable” when using SIGMA’s interchangeable lenses for CANON.</p>
<p>In addition, please also refer to other notice below, related to the usage of EOS mount SIGMA lenses on Canon cameras.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>

<p><b>Phenomenon

</b>When the lenses listed below are used on EOS 6D Mark II, EOS 9000D, EOS Kiss X9i, or EOS Kiss X9 and the “Lens aberration correction” function on the camera is set to “Enable” for Live View shooting, an error would occur.</p>
<p><b>Products Affected</b></p>
<ul>
<li>SIGMA 30mm F1.4 DC HSM | Art</li>
<li>SIGMA 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM</li>
<li>SIGMA 35mm F1.4 DG HSM | Art</li>
<li>SIGMA 50mm F1.4 EX DG HSM</li>
<li>SIGMA 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Usage Notice for customers who are using EOS mount SIGMA lenses on CANON cameras

</b>When using the SIGMA lenses for CANON, “Peripheral illumination correction”, “Chromatic aberration correction”, “Diffraction correction” as well as “Distortion correction” from the “Lens aberration correction” function of the camera are not supported. Therefore, we recommend you to set them to “Disable”.</p>
<p>If those functions are set to “Enable”, the performance of the lenses may not be accurate.</p>
<p>For further information, please contact your nearest authorized <a href="http://www.sigma-global.com/en/about/world-network/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">SIGMA subsidiary / distributor</a>.</p>
<p>We appreciate your continued support for our company and products.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

First 6DMKII photoshoot (WEDDING P3, DEER P6)

Hi Guys,

Thought I would start this topic off as I went out on the 8th of August to shoot the MPT £350m trafford tram development.

Apologies at the beginning that the shoot is not overly exciting. I have a wedding on Friday, I will post some updated thoughts afterward.

Little bit of background. Had my 5DMKIII stolen and was looking for a new camera anyway, I think the 5DMKIV is still a little expensive and didn't want to buy another 5 year old 5DMKIII as I thought it was feeling its age before it got stolen.

I am a wedding event and motorsport photographer primarily but shoot landscape also for companies like United utilities etc on the other hand I travel a lot and my other passion is wildlife and wanted something that could do all but keep in budget. The F8 AF looks great too but yet to test.

I had a lot of things stolen when my house was broken into so replacing other items had taken up quite a lot of my available collateral. (insurance companies are the worst)

The 6DMKII isnt really the ideal camera for me with only one memory card slot, lack of AF selection joystick and AF modes and was an impulse purchase. I wanted something that I can get my work done but not break the bank. This does that, the 5DMKIV is on another level and fantastic but like the 6D isnt 5 years better. I dont think its worth an extra £1000 over this and the 5DMKIII.

What the 6DMKII does offer is all the latest goodies that make the day to day use of the camera a joy - WIFI, tilt screen, bluetooth, viewfinder II, GPS etc. Many of these things are overlooked with how useful they are and my 5DMKIII felt archaic compared to my 7DMKII when I got it 2 years ago and in this respect and the 6DMKII advances even more.

Before I get to the first real paid shoot with the camera I took the camera out on the 7th August (the day I got it) and shot a few images of sunset down the Manchester Canal. I just let the camera do its thing, AV auto ISO. 24-105mm F4 L see what it could do.

Here are a few images 3200, 6400 and 12800 iso

Manchester Canal 6D MKII Test Images by Tom Scott, on Flickr

Manchester Canal 6D MKII Test Images by Tom Scott, on Flickr

Manchester Canal 6D MKII Test Images by Tom Scott, on Flickr

All of these are full resolution so if you click on the image and have a look on Flickr you can zoom to 100% (apologies for the differing apertures I was playing rather than going out to shoot comparisons and the sunset was disappearing quickly.)

I think these results are pretty damn good. The high ISO is excellent and you can see that DR does suffer a little as you get this high to 12800. I feel its is far superior to the 5DMKIII. The difference is the noise pattern is so much nicer and I have only added 5 on the noise selection slider. It responds to noise reduction in a way I have never experienced in a Canon camera.

On another note the camera exposes to the right compared to the 7DMKII 5DMKIII protects the highlights more than the shadows. Highlight recovery isnt as good as the 5DMKIII I generally shot the 5DMKIII the opposite way to most people, I would shoot to protect the shadows rather than the highlights as I found the highlight recovery excellent but the shadow recovery not so... Purple muddy banding in lifted shadow areas and horrible colour noise that took a lot of PP to sort.

The 6DMKII on the other hand the shadows are easy to recover but it does tend to bring more noise, on the positive side there is non of the above and noise reduction really does a fantastic job, a very natural noise pattern.

IMO this sensor feels very similar to the 5DMKIII without the downsides. It does work differently and you have to shoot and PP differently. My MKIII profiles did not do well with the 6DMKII so there is a little bit of a learning curve to get the best out of the sensor with PP.

Once you start working in a slightly different way I think the results are really excellent.

My main complaint with the MKIII was banding and the purple muddy casts. Not really the DR, more the quality of the shadow areas and the 6DMKII has improved here dramatically.

Here are a couple more images

Manchester Canal 6D MKII Test Images by Tom Scott, on Flickr

This image is at ISO 400 and noise has crept into the bottom right but more than usable.

Manchester Canal 6D MKII Test Images by Tom Scott, on Flickr

Again well handled, there is a lot of range there and the image noise is pleasing.


Onto the first proper shoot.

One of my clients is Globus ltd who are global market leaders in PPE producing gloves, glasses, chemical suits, masks and ear defenders with numerous sub brand companies (alpha solway, riley, skytec, showa.)

They recently won a large contract for the £350m Trafford Tram development in Manchester. This development basically extends the tram line past Manchester United all the way down to the Trafford centre and is a huge undertaking.

You can learn more about it here

http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/mpt-wins-350m-contract-to-build-metrolinks-trafford-park-extension

I was asked by Globus to photograph the products in situ with workers for a case study to promote the Riley Eyewear and Showa glove brands. Focusing on the Riley Stream and Sisini revo.

http://www.riley-eyewear.com/safety-glasses/stream

http://www.riley-eyewear.com/safety-glasses/sisini

I took the 6DMKII along and found myself using it primarily. Couple of observations...

- Very sharp images - this camera makes my lenses feel super sharp 70-200mm L F2.8 MKII and 24-70mm L MKI F2.8. Really impressed, images really pop compared to the 5DMKIII and the 7DMKII where they feel softer.

- AF system is a bit hit and miss similar to the 7DMKII. I found that when it hit it really hit but I had some images where nothing in the frame was in focus then it would hit, strange. I have this issue with the 7DMKII and 70D and seems this has the same issue. It wasn't a huge amount but I would say 5% suffered. This is a well documented issue with the 7DMKII 70 and 80D and continues with the 6DMKII. Not that big of a deal.

- AF point spread - the points are too tight for portraiture imo. The 5DMKIII has a better wider spread. I also never had much issue with the 5DMKIII missing like the 7DMKII and the 70D. The 6DMKII seems to be somewhere in the middle.

- Mushy AF selector. I am familiar with this with the 70D. It is bigger and has improved feel on the 6DMKII but its poor IMO. It is not accurate in critical situations. Really dislike it. Thankfully you can use the top and middle rotating dials to change AF point. Takes a bit of getting used to but is much more accurate. The AF joystick is by far the best option and would make the difference between being a back up or primary camera. Just much faster with the joystick.

- Exposure and colour are excellent- classic canon and a joy to view afterward.

- Size and weight - grip is very comfortable probably the most comfortable camera I have used from Canon. Much improved especially the grip. I found that the camera felt a little front heavy with my 24-105 and 24-70 in comparison to the 5DMKIII but the weight saving overall was pleasing when shooting for long periods of time.

- I had no issue with the one card slot never had a card fail in the 15 years ive been working as a pro.

Here are some images

whole album here
https://flic.kr/s/aHsm2csqnW

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

This image the camera evaluated for the sky and was about 1.5 stops under was a mistake on my part but has lifted fine, it is a little noisy under the helmet but you would never know in print so I was pleased with what I could lift.

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

MPT Trafford Tram development - Globus Group product Riley Showa Photoshoot by Tom Scott, on Flickr

Summary

In practical terms it does everything I need. Expose correctly and the images look excellent and there is a lot of scope to PP.

I paid £1489 for the camera which is why I bought it. Second hand MKIIIs are currently £1400-1800 in the UK with under 30k shutter actuation pre owned. 5DMKIV anywhere from £2500-3000.

Why did I buy it?

I have been working more and more in the studio shooting the above PPE products. IQ doesn't really make much difference with controlled light but the Tilt screen is a god send.

It was cheap and the only aspect I feel dual card slots is a benefit are weddings. It is coming to the end of the season with only 4-5 left to do this year as its only one part of my business tend to limit myself because of time constraints and my love for travel.

I intend to keep the camera and buy a 5DMKIV to start next season that way I can use the 6D for travel and use it as a secondary at the weddings to replace my 7DMKII. Possibly sell the 7DMKII.

I feel this has 90% of the MKIIIs features with the issues of the sensor solved all the modern additions that make the 6DMKII a joy to use day to day. The viewfinder II is such a great addition for me, where I can see all my settings all the time and GPS for travel is excellent.

One other feature that hasn't had much exposure that saves your ass in speedy situations is the ISO linked focal length setting. It sets auto ISO to a shutter speed equal to the focal length. Fantastic when situations change quickly like they do at weddings or if you quickly change lenses and action starts.

This is excellent value for a camera under £1500, I cant complain at all. It should not be a £2000 camera just like the MKIV shouldn't have been a £3500 launch figure.

Very happy with the camera so far. AF is good not great but the 5DMKIII was excellent and this is better just not 5 years better. IQ is good overall and has more than I need in 90% of situations. The sharpness is incredible, low light performance which I use it most 640-6400 - shooting weddings Motorsport and events is in a different league AF performance in low light is also really impressive too.

Similar to the 5DMKII to III the AF is the difference between getting shots and not. Same here with the 6D if you shoot events and weddings focus recompose is not accurate enough with shallow DOF, although the spread is smaller than the 5DMKIII you have more sensitive points where you need them compared to the 6D.

At the end of the day the 6DMKII is what it is. I wasnt blown away with it on paper but in actual use it is excellent and does what you need. Ok the competition has better DR, I never push that far its very rare and it might be one shot that I got wrong where I may need to. 1.5-2 is as far as I go and this has more than enough for that range.

It is not revolutionary and in a few situations isnt as good on paper. What I want to emphasize is the files are easy to work on and you can get amazing results because it PPs so well. Ok it doesn't have 5 stops but in all the images above I haven't pushed more than 1.5 stops even in the image I got wrong and very very rarely do.

If your a 5DMKIII owner the 6D would be an ideal secondary camera with more modern features. I dont think I would replace it. I would have a MKIV over this all day it really is the no compromise camera in the current canon lineup. A 5DMKIII and a 5DMKIV is a wicked combo for all pros but the 6DMKII is better to travel and walk around with.

If your a 6D owner and shoot more than landscape I think its more than a worthwhile upgrade the AF system will dramatically increase your keepers in fast moving situations and aid with many other situations. 6Ds are still like £1000 preowned too so for an extra £500 new your getting a lot of camera.

If you would like to view some RAW images let me know.

Clarification & Corrections on the Upcoming New Lenses from Canon [CR3]

HTML:
Further clarification and corrections on <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/new-tilt-shift-lenses-to-be-45mm-90mm-135mm-cr2/">our previous reports</a> regarding the new tilt-shift lenses that are coming.</p>
<p>We’re told that we were incorrect on the TS-E 45mm f/2.8L and that it is in fact a TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro, the TS-E 90mm f/2.8L was correct, except that it to, will have macro functionality. We also assumed that all of the lenses are f/2.8L, but we’re told that the TS-E 135mm is actually an f/4L with macro capability.</p>
<p>The macro feature is 1:2 and not 1:1 across all three of the new tilt-shift lenses.</p>
<p>We also received further information in regards to the EF 85mm f/1.4L IS, a lens I’m looking forward to.</p>
<p><strong>The new tilt-shift lenses</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro</li>
<li>TS-E 90mm f/2.8L Macro</li>
<li>TS-E 135mm f/4L Macro</li>
<li>All these new tilt-shift lenses have 1:2 (0.5x) macro magnification</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS USM</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Positioned between the EF 85mm f/1.2L II and the EF 85mm f/1.8</li>
<li>Same styling as the new EF 35mm f/1.4L II</li>
<li>Fast AF and a 4 stop effective IS.</li>
</ul>
<p>All of this is still [CR2] until we get the confirmation that makes us comfortable with upgrading the rating of the rumor. This round of lenses has been extremely hard to get information on, but we do hope we have now got the correct information.</p>
<p>We’re still told everything is coming at the end of August.</p>
<p><em><strong>Update: 18:09 EST, August 12, 2017:</strong> We’ve upgraded this information to [<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/the-canon-rumors-rating-system-explained/">CR3</a>]</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Review: Canon EOS 6D Mark II by DPReview

HTML:
DPReview has completed their review of the Canon EOS 6D Mark II rather quickly and came away liking, but not loving it.</p>
<p><strong>From DPReview:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>It’s true that every objective specification of the 6D Mark II has been improved upon when compared with its predecessor, while the release price has remained the same. Unfortunately, unless you’re a die-hard Canon user with an investment in glass and you just need an affordable backup body, it’s difficult to look past all that competing cameras have to offer…..</p>

<p>… As it should be, the EOS 6D II is a better camera than its predecessor in every way. With plenty of resolution, respectable burst shooting speeds and pleasing Canon color, it’s a camera that’s capable of producing great images in a variety of situations. Despite this, it is simply overshadowed by competition that is made up of more capable cameras at similar or lower prices. <a href="https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-6d-mark-ii-review">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Just like most of the people that have used the Canon EOS 6D Mark II, it’s a nice upgrade from the original, but may not compete all that well with competitors. Here’s hoping we don’t have to wait another 5 years for a successor.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, the camera will be judged by how well it sells. Casual consumers have a tendency to care a little less about certain specifications than us passionate gear nuts.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

New Tilt Shift Lenses to be 45mm, 90mm, 135mm [CR2]

HTML:
We’re told that the new TS-E lenses from Canon will be 45mm, 90mm and 135mm. One of the lenses (we think the 135mm) will be a macro, though we don’t know if it’s a 1:1 macro.</p>
<p><strong>Upcoming Canon Lenses:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EF 85mm f/1.4L IS</li>
<li>Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8L</li>
<li>Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8L</li>
<li>Canon TS-E 135mm f/2.8L Macro? (We’re not 100% sure on the speed of the lens and what sort of macro capability it will have)</li>
</ul>
<p>We’re keeping this at [CR2] until we get a confirmation we’re absolutely confident about.</p>

<p>We’re still wondering about the “Made In Malaysia” from the <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/unreleased-canon-gear-has-appeared-for-certification/">certification post from a few weeks back</a>, and for the moment we cannot confirm or deny the country of manufacture or if that “Made in Malaysia” even had anything to do with the new tilt-shift lenses.</p>
<p><em><strong>Correction:

</strong>We have <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/clarification-corrections-on-the-upcoming-new-lenses-from-canon-cr2/">written another post that contradicts this one</a> on a couple of points. 1) the TS-E 45mm f/2.8L will likely be a TS-E 50mm f/2.8L Macro, and the TS-E 135mm f/2.8L Macro is likely a TS-E 135mm f/4L Macro.</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
<div style="font-size:0px;height:0px;line-height:0px;margin:0;padding:0;clear:both"></div>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,437
Messages
973,528
Members
24,802
Latest member
Gerry L

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB