• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

How To Fix Weird Visual Behaviour When Pairing the EOS-1D X Mark II & Sigma Lenses

HTML:
A few years ago, very few people would be pairing a flagship Canon DSLR with Sigma lenses, but this has all changed with the change in direction Sigma has taken with their Art and Sports series lenses.</p>
<p>That said, there appears to be an issue with the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II and Sigma lenses when paired together, you see in the image above the type of visual defect we’re talking about. It appears the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II is attempting to correct vignetting and other characteristics of the Sigma lens attached. As you can see, it’s not doing a very good job.</p>
<p>To correct this issue do the following.</p>
<ul>
<li>Navigate to red menu 1 and locate <strong>Lens abberation correction</strong></li>
<li>Turn <strong>Peripheral illum corr</strong> to OFF</li>
</ul>
<p>This should solve your issues so you can get back to enjoying your EOS-1D X Mark II and excellent Sigma lenses.</p>
<p><em>image credit // <a href="https://www.slrlounge.com/pairing-canon-1dx-mk-ii-sigma-35mm-art-lens-creates-weird-effect/" target="_blank">SLRLounge</a></em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Trim Canon MXF Files - Is this Possible?

I've got some massive long-take MXF files (it's wildlife), and it would be helpful to trim out only the bits I need.

Is there any NLE or utility app that will perform a lossless trim? I've tried the various consolidate functions in Edius 8.2, Premiere CS 5.5, and Resolve 12.5, and none will do this...they just copy the entire clip, rather than only the used portions.

Any ideas? Or am I stuck with either keeping the extra data, or transcoding to an intermediate codec (which is what I used to do with AVCHD.)

Thanks.

Review: Canon EOS-1D X Mark II by TDP

HTML:
<p>Bryan at The-Digital-Picture has completed his review of the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II, and came away impressed by the host of improvements over its predecessor.</p>
<p>Bryan’s Summary</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">My expectation that the 1D X II was going to be worth the upgrade from the 1D X was very high. </span>That I sold my 1D X at 1D X II announcement time made clear my confidence that this would the best sports/action camera ever. I have no regrets – the 1D X II exceeded my expectations. To me, it was worth the upgrade.</p>
<p>The 1D X Mark II is directly targeted at professional use where speed, reliability and bringing home the best possible image are important. This use includes sports, wildlife, fast action, reportage, weddings, events, media and wire service use in the toughest environments. If getting the shot matters, this is the camera I want in my hands. That this camera is so fun to use makes getting that all-important shot a great all-around experience. <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-1D-X-Mark-II.aspx">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I won’t be putting the camera through any serious work until next month in Africa, but I expect to experience the same great things that Bryan has using the camera.</p>
<p>The EOS-1D X Mark II has been somewhat hard to come by, but at the moment it appears that the <a href="http://bit.ly/23Mjw42">Canon Store has stock</a> of the premium kit.</p>
<p>Buy/Preorder Canon EOS-1D X Mark II</p>
<ul>
<li>Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Premium Kit $5999: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1221604-REG/canon_0931c016_eos_1d_x_mark_ii.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://adorama.evyy.net/c/60085/51926/1036?u=www.adorama.com/ICA1DXM2KP.html" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1m9GcsS" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <strong><a href="http://bit.ly/23Mjw42" target="_blank">Canon Store</a></strong></li>
<li>Canon WFT-E8A $599: <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1221610-REG/canon_1173c001_wft_e7a_wireless_file_transmitter.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">B&H Photo</a> | <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICAWFTE8A.html?KWID=64393" target="_blank">Adorama</a> | <a href="http://amzn.to/1POf7D2" target="_blank">Amazon</a> | <a href="http://bit.ly/23MjDMI" target="_blank">Canon Store</a></li>
</ul>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

1DX mark II 4K framegrabs, Technicolor Cinestyle log-profile

I collected couple of 4K framegrabs which were shot at Technicolor Cinestyle log-profile. 1DX2 does not come with the Canon Log (or C-Log), and an alternative is needed to be used to shoot log style. Here are the examples how the Cinestyle looks on the 1DX2 (vs. most 1DX2 videos to the date in the Youtube has been shot with the standard profile with crushed contrast):

If you want to try to grade these, feel free:
https://flic.kr/s/aHskzsEgdd

  • Locked
1DX Mark II LCD screen

I can't seem to find the right brightness for the screen and the white balance is so off I don't even know what the image is going to look like until I see it on the computer...
The old 1DX LCD white balance representation was off but this one is waaaaaay different. Skin tones look bluer and duller than they really are. I tried shooting in Auto WB or even Flash or anything and I can't really see which one is more accurate.
Talking about Auto WB. Wow... horrible... Shooting the same exact scene with the same flashes and settings changes dramatically between images. so much that it is scary unusable...
I like the images to be as faithful as possible on the screen and at least show my client what they look like while shooting but, again, the skin tones and whites are totally off.
Is there a way to change the temperature of the actual LCD?
It is very hard to work like this.
Thanx! Pat

Cleaning lenses

How do you clean your front elements?

There's an article from Lensrentals.com: https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/05/the-lensrentals-lens-cleaning-methods/
They never use microfibre cloth for the front element because any particles in the cloth might scratch. Instead disposable cloths from Zeiss are used. What do you think: is this too strict and do you use the same microfibre cloth over and over again or not? What other methods do you use?

I use a blower first and then a microfibre cloth that I only use for filters and front elements and which I keep in a sealed plastic bag.

A New Full Frame Zoom Coming in 2016 [CR2]

HTML:
We’re told that Canon will announce a new full frame zoom lens following the announcement and shipping of the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM which <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-ef-16-35mm-f2-8l-iii-coming-in-june-cr3/">we wrote about last week</a>. We expect this lens to be shipping some time in July.</p>
<p>We weren’t told the exact focal length of the lens, but that it would be a replacement for a current non L/DO telephoto zoom. The only lens that we can think of would be a replacement for the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS. We were <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/more-canon-super-telephoto-zoom-talk-cr1/">first told about a replacement for this lens last year</a>, and have been waiting to hear more about it.</p>
<p>This is likely going to be an August announcement, in time for Photokina and the EOS 5D Mark IV.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

What gear to bring for London?

Hey guys, so I'm heading to London in a week and I'm struggling with what cameras and lenses to bring as it's supposed to be a 5 day chill trip with my girlfriend not a photography one, however I'm also meeting a friend who is a professional athlete that I met through Instagram who wanted to meet for a drink/go on a photo mission so I'm sort of torn between keeping a light set up and bringing enough gear to get an amazing picture for her as it would really help my career.

Right now my light weight set up is my 1DX and my 35mm 1.4 II witch can cover low light, a one lens set up, speed with the 12fps if she wants to do something with sports for our photo shoot.

The bring enough gear set up is two 1DX camera's a 24-70 2,8 ii 70-200 2.8 ii is and the 35mm 1.4 ii but I know bringing that is stupid however like I said I'm worried the light weight setup won't be enough.


It's a stupid question I know but as I'm just getting started with my career I'm scared of messing up this opportunity that I feel could give me a good jump start so any advice/help would be really appreciated thank you!

Review: Canon ImagePROGRAF Pro-1000

HTML:
Keith over at Northlight has completed his exhaustive review of the Canon ImagePROGRAF Pro-1000 17″ printer. This is a printer I am personally considering, along with the offerings from Epson.</p>
<p>From Northlight:</p>
<blockquote><p>The images I produced on the range of papers look great, both colour and B&W – I took the chance to print out much of my architectural and commercial portfolio images at A3+ size, where the general vibrance and colour quality is something I’m happy to use to promote aspects of my photography business.</p>
<p>The new ink set, with the gloss coat pushes the depth and intensity of prints to levels where it’s definitely the skill of the photographer that’s more likely to limit the quality of the print. If your images are great, then your prints can match them. <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/reviews/printer/review-canon_pro-1000.html">Read the full review</a></p></blockquote>
<p>It looks like Canon has improved a lot of the weaknesses with the Pro-1, a printer I used to own and never loved.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sigma 150-600mm customization

I traded one of my 100-400mm IIs for a Sigma 150-600mm C last Thursday from the local shop after I borrowed and tested it. The Sigmas vary from copy to copy, some have tested much worse than the Tamron. This copy is off-scale at the top end in their quality control. It beats my 100-400 IIs at 400 in the centre and matches them at the edges at 400mm, and kills them at 560mm with 1.4xTCs when it is set to 600mm, where it is also ahead of my 300mm f/2.8 II + 2xTC.

The first problem was with the OS - it is all aver the place in the viewfinder. But, I got a Sigma dock today and fixed the problem using dynamic OS.

What other customizations would you recommend for bird and other photography?

Here are a couple of shots on the 5DS R at 600mm. The first is the best I have ever taken of a barnswallow - no sharpening at all from RAW. The second is a tiny 650x450 crop of my local peregrine falcon 48 m up a tower.

Attachments

  • Barnswallow_3Q7A4462_DxO_croppedCR.jpg
    Barnswallow_3Q7A4462_DxO_croppedCR.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 309
  • peregrinefalcon_3Q7A5054_CR.jpg
    peregrinefalcon_3Q7A5054_CR.jpg
    793.7 KB · Views: 293

Lube

Hello,

I’ve recently invested in some Lee filters and have a question or two regarding the wide angle lens mount.
I’m having difficulty screwing the mound on to my 17-40mm lens.
I live in fear of thread-locking the mount and ruining the thread on my lens for good.

Would a lubricant help?
If so, what’s the safest to use?

Any help gratefully received.

Test shots with Canon 1DX mark II

Hello,

I have collected a new Flickr album of few shots we took with our 1DX2.
https://flic.kr/s/aHskA1qaVX

The last photo on this album is a still frame extracted from the 500 mbit/s MJPEG 4K video. The stills captured from video frames are same quality as the jpegs out of the camera (albeit 8 mpix only) and this is the first camera that makes no difference between stills and motion (on limited fashion as obviously the video is not yet 20 mpix, but on today's terms almost as good as it gets prior to higher bit depths).

We are extremely happy with the camera, both the video and stills from it are very good IMO and the upgrade from 5D mark II feels large (skipped 5D3 in between).

Best Regards,
Karoliina Salminen

1Dx mk2 DPAF performance...not like the reviews

I used this camera to do a graduation outside and a dance recital indoors. I used it with a 70-200 mkII IS with 2X III extender at F8 and the live view DPAF had to constantly be babysat. if someone else walked by on the stage it would grab their face and they would run away with the focus. During the dance recital I only used the 70-200 and there was 1 girl it absolutely would not hold focus on simply bc she had a dress on that was close to the color of the stage background or at least thats what I believe. It searched on her nonstop in all 3 scenes she was in. I had someone else shooting for me with a C100 mk2 and it had absolutely no issues with focus using the 100-400 mk2. It rarely went out of focus. Keeping focus 99% of the time even the moment the lights went up during a scene change. Id say the 1Dx mk2 kept focus 80% of the time but when the lights would go from black to bright it would hunt like crazy trying to focus for maybe 3-5 seconds. It would also randomly lose focus even on solo performances for a second or 2. The conditions at the graduation were ISO 100 1/125 F8-F11. At the dance recital ISO 1600-4000 F5.6 1/30. Im just not understanding why the C100mk 2 has such a more efficient focusing system. Something about them doesnt seem likely that they are really the same.

Canon EOS 80D filmmaker-oriented review (& 5D MKIII comparison)

Hi there!
I just wrote this review:
www.luciolepri.it/nwp/canon_eos_80d_review.htm
I was curious to check the new sensor performances and to see if this camera could be a good second body for shooting events. I was mostly attracted by the Movie Servo AF feature. Unfortunately, video noise, as usual with Canon APS-C cameras, it's very high...

Canon Launches Renewed Global Website Using New .canon Top-Level Domain Name

HTML:
<strong>TOKYO, May 16, 2016</strong>—Canon Inc. announced that the Company has gone live today with a renewed global website employing a web address that departs from the traditional location-specific “www.canon.com” to the new “global.canon” proprietary domain name. The launch marks Canon’s first use of the “.canon” top-level domain<sup>1</sup> (TLD) since acquiring it in February 2015.</p>
<p>Because “.canon” can only be used by Canon Group companies and services, visitors to sites that use the new TLD can easily confirm their authenticity and be assured that the information they contain is reliable. Additionally, by leveraging the simplicity of the TLD, which is easy to remember and easy to understand, Canon aims to enhance the Company’s global brand value.</p>
<p><strong>Canon begins using new “.canon” top-level domain

</strong>The TLD “.canon,” which makes use of Canon’s company name in the right-most side of the web address, is based on the new generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program.<sup>2</sup> With the launch today of the “global.canon” website,<sup>3</sup> Canon is providing information to a global audience with a new online presence.</p>
<p><strong>Canon renews global website

</strong>Canon conducts business activities around the world, providing information and services over the Internet to not only the Company’s customers, business partners and shareholders, but to all stakeholders in countries and regions across the globe. In addition to the English-language version of the “global.canon” website launched today, Canon will introduce other languages to the site in the future to share brand messages and other information globally.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Photozone Review: Tamron 150-600 on the 5DS R

There you go:
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/976-tamron150600f563vc?start=1

As PZ is just getting started with the 50 MP sensor testing, they have withheld their optical quality star rating of the lens until they've tested more lenses. This is the first they've tested longer than 35mm on the 5DS R, so it might be a while before we have something to stack it up against.

- A

Patent: EF-M 15-50mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM

HTML:
The EOS M patents continue to flood in, this time we get a patent for an EF-M 15-50mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM optical formula.</p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2016-75742 (Google translated)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2016.5.12</li>
<li>Filing date 2014.10.3</li>
<li>Zoom ratio 2.94</li>
<li>Focal length 16.00 27.43 47.04</li>
<li>F-number 3.62 4.50 5.82</li>
<li>Half angle of view (degrees) 37.55 26.47 16.19</li>
<li>Image height 12.30 13.66 13.66</li>
<li>Overall length of the lens 78.86 74.05 77.88</li>
<li>BF 20.48 27.14 37.06</li>
</ul>
<p>This definitely looks like a kit type of zoom lens from the upcoming EOS M body, which we expect to be announced before the end of 2016.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB