A Bit of EOS 5D Mark IV & EOS 7D Mark II Information [CR2]

HTML:
While [CR3] level specifications for the EOS 5D Mark IV have been hard to come by, something we’ll be able to fix some time this week. We do have some information on pricing and kits that’ll be available.</p>
<p>We’re told that the body only will likely come in less than what the EOS 5D Mark III launched at, which was $3499. We’re told the EOS 5D Mark IV would come in at $3299 USD. As always with pricing, it could be old information and things may have moved a bit due to currency fluctuations. While we’d love to see a $2999 price point, we don’t think that’s likely with the information we have.</p>
<p>The EOS 5D Mark IV will come in two kits, one with the EF 24-70mm f/4L IS and the other with the brand new EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II. The EF 24-70mm f/4L IS kit will be the lower priced option between the two lens options.</p>
<p>As for the EOS 7D Mark II, we’re told that the body and lens kits will come bundled with the upcoming W-P1 wifi adaptor going forward. This should tell you that the EOS 7D Mark II will be around for a while  and not to expect an update in 2017. A EOS 7D Mark  II will also be kitted with the new EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens.</p>
<p>We haven’t received any more information about the EOS 7D Mark II firmware update that’s coming.</p>
<p><em>More to come…</em></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Costa Rica: 300 2.8 II or 100-400 II

In September, I will be visiting Costa Rica for 3 weeks (Tortuguero, Cahuita National Park, Arenal, Monteverde, Samara, Manuel Antonio, Puerto Jimenez, Corcovado National Park, San Gerardo de Dota) We will visit several times the national parks.

The 600 II + 1.4x will be for sure in the backpack. For shorter range I'm still doubting between the 300 2.8II and the 100-400 II. The first gives me much more possibilities in case of low light and a very smooth bokey. On the other hand, the 100-400 II is such a versatile lens. We are mostly interested in birds but also in mammels.

What are your thoughts for Costa Rica ?

Other lenses that will accompanying me : 16-35 F4, 24-105 F4, 100 IS Macro and perhaps the TS24. All on FF body.

C-Log 4K for 5D Mark IV ? - DigitalRev TV

Kai from DigitalRev TV mentioned this in the latest video, when talking about the video of the 1DX Mark II...

"But it doesn't have LOG. C-Log. Whatever they call it. If you want a 4K Canon, I'd probably wait for something else... something ending with... Mark 4. Possibly coming out around Photokina time."

https://youtu.be/qx4BmzWghC4?t=702

I wonder if Kai already knows the 5D Mark IV has C-Log 4K video? Or if it's just his estimate? It certainly sounded like he knew it for a fact though.

Amount of front focusing shifts between f2.8 and f4.0 70-200 II

I am doing some manual AFMA on a new 70-200 mark II on a 6D body. I set a value of -7 for 200mm, 2.8 which makes it perfect focus. When I do test shots at different f stops, there is a very noticeable change to front focus at f4.0. Same problem setting up for 70mm. I have never experienced this with past AFMA's on different bodies/lenses. Can anyone tell me what the problem might be?

would a 16mp 5D MklV be a good idea?

We seem to be specialising more and more with camera bodies now, arguably the 1DX for sport/wildlife; the 5DS for landscape/architecture/studio; is the 5D Mklll the general purpose low light entry? - my general ff overview only.
I shoot weddings and invariably end up in some dark places where flash is not allowed. The specs list (?) of the 5D MklV doesn't interest me sufficiently to stump up a further £3500, but were a MklV at 16-18mp in the offing with a considerable boost to low noise-high ISO being offered (without getting figure obsessed, but say an increase of 1.5 to 2 stops), that probably would have me checking my bank balance.
I accept the frame rate wouldn't go up - compete with the 1DX series then, but a little extra dynamic range as well maybe.
So, who would like to see a serious dedicated low light camera, 16-18mp? No increase to frame rate, that just wouldn't be given. Costing £3500 probably. Would you buy it?
Just a bit of fun.....but who knows, maybe Canon reads these threads...

Canon pro 100

Seems to me each time I turn this printer on, it cycles thru about a minute or longer "getting ready" ... then, when I hit the print button, it seems to do it all over again before the print will begin.

Then, when I start another print, it seems the print cage runs thru an entire process again, sounds like it's printing on the bed - almost like a cleaning cycle. THEN finally, it prints the image. But it shouldn't do a "cleaning cycle", if that's what it's doing, between each print.

Does this seem right to you all? I'd think it would cycle once when you turn it on, and then print with a minimal cycle time between prints.

I'm using all Canon products - both print containers and ink -- not refills, just new cartridges every time I run out of a color.

Maybe we really can't have it all...

I had my M3 until last month when I got an 80D. The M3 was sufficient for my use in many ways but it's just too slow to operate and the grip is so small that sometimes I felt like I was having hand joint pain. But it had one huge advantage that I now miss so sorely--its size and weight. I used to be able to carry both 5dmk3 + M3. Now it's bit much to carry 5dmk3 + 80d.

The 80D is absolutely awesome. My initial plan was to ditch all the M lenses and stick to EF lenses. After two weeks of use I wanted to give efs lenses a try. I thought if the efs 18-135 stm is on par with efm 18-55 I'd be quite satisfied. In fact I got both efs 10-18 and efs 18-135 stm thinking I could have substantial weight reduction. I did. However the IQ of these two lenses are nothing compared to the efm 18-55 and efm 11-22. Returned both.

I wish we could have an 80D-like body with a full frame sensor, or an M3-like body with the responsiveness of the 80D. But no, you can't have everything perfect...

EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM

My new EF-M 28mm Macro lens arrived this week, a fun little toy. Focus on my M2 seems reasonably fast (a bit faster than the 22/2). Just grabbed a few shots last night at 1:1.

The integrated lights are a great idea, and with the two separate continuous LED lights, the power can be varied independently – the single button cycles them together through high, low and off, and with a long press, through left high/low, right high/low. FWIW, at 1:1 distance the high setting delivers about 8 EV of light, and the low setting is ~1 EV dimmer.

The shots below are:

1. Ambient lighting (2700 K LED), 30 s, f/11, ISO 400 (WB set to Tungsten during RAW conversion)
2. Lens LED on high, 1.6 s, f/11, ISO 400 (WB set to Flash during RAW conversion)
3. Lens LED on low, 5 s, f/11, ISO 400 (WB set to Flash during RAW conversion)

There's no good way this type of shot could have been done handheld in that ambient lighting, but with the built-in lights and assuming a ~3-stop IS, I'd only have needed two more stops of light to handhold (e.g. ISO 1600, which will yield decent results with DxO Prime NR).

I'll get out and do some 'real' shooting with the lens soon...

Attachments

  • Rose 1.jpg
    Rose 1.jpg
    322.9 KB · Views: 432
  • Rose 2.jpg
    Rose 2.jpg
    408.2 KB · Views: 442
  • Rose 3.jpg
    Rose 3.jpg
    399.6 KB · Views: 451

Canon W-E1 Wifi Adaptor To Work on Various Cameras

HTML:
Northlight has been told that the upcoming Canon W-E1 SD card style wifi adaptor will work on various Canon DSLRs. You can expect different levels of functionality depending on which DSLR you use the adaptor with.</p>
<p>We imagine there will be firmware updates coming quite soon after the announcement of the new accessory for supporting DSLRs. We had been told previously that a <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-related-announcements-coming-for-photokina/">firmware update was coming for the EOS 7D Mark II</a>, but we’re not  sure if there’s going to be any features added beyond bug fixes and support for the W-E1.</p>
<p> </p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Canon Professional Services Keeps Professional Sports Photographers Ready For Action

HTML:
<strong>MELVILLE, N.Y., August 3, 2016</strong> – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, will be bringing their service and support expertise to Brazil to help maximize the uptime and performance of its users’ professional imaging equipment. From pro DSLR cameras and EF lenses to broadcast television lenses, Canon’s award-winning service and support staff will be providing preventative maintenance and repairs to help professionals who have put their trust in Canon imaging equipment.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>Canon’s team of over 70 highly trained technicians and support staff will be in Brazil for nearly a month to support professional photographers and broadcasters, just as they do throughout the year. Canon Professional Services (CPS) is set to provide comprehensive equipment maintenance and repairs, extensive equipment loans and expert technical support.</p>
<p>“Canon is proud to offer professional photographers and broadcasters high quality image-making solutions that are thoughtfully designed and versatile so that they can capture sharp, clear, detailed images and video,” said Elizabeth Pratt, director, Professional Client Development and Support, Canon U.S.A. “Knowing that iconic images will be captured, seen and shared by people around the world really drives Canon to provide professionals with not only high quality equipment but the customer support they need to help ensure they never miss a beat if anything happens to their equipment.”</p>
<p>Canon EOS DSLR cameras and EF lenses are the camera and lenses of choice of a majority of the top U.S.-based news agencies and professional sports photographers.</p>
<p>The Associated Press will be using Canon cameras and lenses exclusively, including cameras which are integrated with advanced robotics systems. The robotic camera systems can be mounted both in the rafters high above a field of play and underwater in pools, all fully controlled remotely over a network. “High-speed and high-performing digital imaging solutions like the EOS-1D X Mark II camera and L-series EF lenses are key to our team’s success,” said Santiago Lyon, vice president and director of photography, Associated Press. “Canon provides innovative technology and world-class optics that give us the solutions we need to create compelling images.”</p>
<p>A majority of Reuters photographers from around the world will be using Canon DSLR cameras and lenses and trust Canon products and award-winning support team to keep them up and running. “Photographing large sporting events for thousands of news outlets and an audience of billions requires meticulous planning and technical resilience. The staff and engineers from CPS help ensure that the Canon cameras used by the world’s top sports photographers receive precision treatment that allows them to take pictures that capture key moments and illustrate the spirit of competition,” said Kevin Coombs, editor-in-chief for Thomson Reuters.</p>
<p>The Canon EOS-1D X Mark II DSLR camera and ultra-wide zoom EF 11-24mm f/4L USM lens were selected to be used for Getty Images’ new high-tech, remote-controlled underwater robotic system. The camera provides Getty Images with a fully networkable solution that features precise white balance, a blazing fast frame rate and impressive low-light capabilities, which make the camera ideal for capturing fast action. When combined with the durable and rugged EF 11-24mm f/4L USM lens, the system will allow Getty Images to capture images at extremely wide perspectives with incredible sharpness and minimal distortion from the center of the image to the periphery, all across the entire zoom range. “As the world’s leading visual communications company, we believe that our world class sports photographers must have the most up-to-date photographic technology that empowers them to do their job, and to do it exceptionally well. Getty Images is using Canon’s EOS-1D X Mark II cameras and EF 11-24mm f/4L USM lenses in a unique, remotely-controlled underwater camera system that gives us the flexibility to follow and capture action from beneath,” said Ken Mainardis, vice president of Sport at Getty Images. “We recently used the new underwater system and the images were remarkable. We’re looking forward to using our Canon gear to capture more fantastic underwater imagery.”</p>
<p>“The European Pressphoto Agency (EPA) will have a photographic team of 40 capturing incredible moments. Months ago, EPA’s entire U.S. contingent switched over to the Canon EOS System,” explained Gernot Hensel, EPA’s long-standing head of sports and deputy editor-in-chief. “The EPA team is comprised of colleagues from all over the world, and the majority of them will be using Canon equipment, including robotic systems, to capture the action.”</p>
<p>Simon Bruty, an award-winning sports photographer and Canon Explorer of Light is one of the best sports photographers in the world. “As a professional photographer, I have to be able to capture every moment of the action because a hundredth of a second can mean the difference between capturing or missing the winning moment or race finish, and Canon cameras, like the new EOS-1D X Mark II, deliver the stunning image quality and speed I need while working,” said Mr. Bruty. “The 14 frames per second that the EOS-1D X Mark II camera can capture, which enables over 12 seconds of continuous RAW shooting without buffering, means that I could shoot an entire 100 meter dash without taking my finger off of the shutter release. If I shot in JPEG mode and have a large enough memory card, I could do it for the entire 2+ hours of a marathon race!”</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Sony FE 70-200 f2.8 GM OSS - test shots

Received my 70200GM yesterday. Photos don't seem to be "tack sharp" as Canon 70200f2.8 IS II in AF-C(Ai servo in Canon). Tracking moving subject(side to side, back to front) very well. I'm not sure if I got a bad copy or my firmware is out of date. I can see mirrorless outdoor sports shooters will appreciate this lens with A6300.

Here are some photos shot with a7r II, AF-C, @ f2.8:
https://dylannguyen.smugmug.com/Events/2016-08-02-Sony-FE-70-200-f28/


Latest firmware got installed last night. Will give it another try today before contact BH...

A small favor to ask..

Hi there

I am a long time forum lurker here - not much to say but learnt plenty here over the years...!

I found out I made the finalists in the Popular Photography Magazine Competition and as much as I hate to ask, if anyone wouldn't mind voting my way it would be greatly appreciated (the prize is a training course).

My image is of the London Eye reflected under the name AntonyZPhoto.
Seems you don't have to register to vote - just a simple click - as I say humbled if you wouldn't mind taking the time to help!

http://www.popphoto.com/lovementorseries-photo-contest-finalists

Many thanks and have a fantastic week

Tony

Photographer sues Getty Images for $1 billion after she's billed for her own pho

Many of you may have been following this news about Getty, I am reluctant to pass judgement until I hear both sides, but after the lame comment by Getty, its pretty obvious that they have been caught red handed.

They have taken images they had no rights to and have been selling them, and the comment makes it sound intentional. They even threatened the Photographer and owner of the images with a lawsuit for using them.

This may put them in a deep hole. Getty is well known for lawsuits for using images that don't belong to them, which makes them liable for triple damages.

Their lame response basically is a admission that they took the images that they had no right to sell, charged for them, and even sued users who did not pay.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-getty-copyright-20160729-snap-story.html

"Neither Getty nor Alamy has filed a formal answer to the lawsuit. In a public statement, however, Getty responded with bluster. The agency says the lawsuit is “based on a number of misconceptions” and plans to “defend [itself] vigorously.” It acknowledges that the images are in the public domain, but still maintains that it has the right to charge a fee for distributing the material. “Distributing and providing access to public domain content is different to asserting copyright ownership of it,” Getty says. That’s true as far as it goes, but skates over the question of who gave it permission to distribute the content on any terms."

Canon W-E1 Wifi Adaptor Confirmed

HTML:
<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-related-announcements-coming-for-photokina/">We reported last week</a> that the EOS 7D Mark II would see a wifi adaptor that would be a lot cheaper than the WFT-E7A, and it appears that adaptor will be the W-E1.</p>
<p>Specifications for the W-E1</p>
<ul>
<li>Size: 24.0Mm x 32.0Mm x 2.1Mm</li>
<li>Weight: about 2g</li>
<li>Transmission scheme: IEEE 802.11B / G / N</li>
<li>Transfer range: 10m/33ft</li>
<li>Allows the camera to be remote controlled from a smartphone</li>
<li>Wireless remote operation possible using EOS Utility</li>
</ul>
<p>You an see a page from the manual after the break.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/canon_W-E1_001-1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-26280" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/canon_W-E1_001-1-231x575.png" alt="canon_W-E1_001-1" width="231" height="575" srcset="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/canon_W-E1_001-1-231x575.png 231w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/canon_W-E1_001-1-411x1024.png 411w, http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/canon_W-E1_001-1.png 500w" sizes="(max-width: 231px) 100vw, 231px" /></a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

  • Poll Poll
135mm f/2 L vs 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM

Which image do you prefer:

  • I prefer the rendering of the image on the left

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • I prefer the rendering of the image on the right

    Votes: 11 44.0%
  • I see no obvious difference in rendering

    Votes: 10 40.0%

Over the past weekend I attended a fashion photography workshop which was hosted by Canon South Africa. I got to shoot with a 5Ds, a DSLR I am seriously considering buying depending on how the 5D-IV will be spec'ed. I found this a good opportunity to put a few lenses under the cosh.

My primary concern was doing some sort of real world comparison between the EF 135mm f/2 L USM and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM. I'm not concerned with ultimate sharpness with these images. I got the 5Ds at the event, so had no time to do AFMA. I found both lenses front-focused slightly, which could easily be corrected with AFMA if this was my camera. I also know from test charts that both are excellent when properly focused.

Technical stuff:
The 70-200mm shot was with IS mode 1 and reportedly taken at 190mm f/2.8
The 135mm image was taken at f/2 (scaled for same subject size as the 70-200 shot)
Shutter speed was 1/160s for both images and camera was in auto ISO.

So, which image do you think is rendered better?

Attachments

  • 135L vs 70-200L-II.jpg
    135L vs 70-200L-II.jpg
    757.9 KB · Views: 620

70-200 f/4: IS or non-IS

i want to get a 70-200 f/4 since i already have a 2.8 (not one that would be expected :P ) but it's too heavy for taking it backpacking.
I know the IS version has a revised optical formula and from what i can tell from the IQ comparison on TDP, there is a slight advantage for the IS version, but only at 200mm...
my question is: is the IS version worth it over the non-IS? is that slightly better IQ @ 200mm visible in real life?

I have seen comparisons only between the 2.8 non-IS and 4 IS, since these are about the same price...

AF assit slows camera AF again!!

A few years ago when I upgraded to the 5d3 and 600ex-rt flashes I was frustrated when I found that the AF assist beam caused the camera to slow when it acquired focus. I started a post about it and a few others had the same issue. Canon issued a firmware update and the problem was solved. You can look that the thread here:

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=10275.0

I received the 1dx2 in May and have shot several weddings and receptions with it so far. During each reception I have shot, I have been a little thrown off with the AF speed with the 600ex and AF assist enabled. It is just a hair slower. It is nothing like the previous issue I had with the 5d3 and the 600ex, but it is still an issue for me. I have tuned it on and off several times and every time it is off, the focus is instantaneous and when it is on it hesitates a little. It will find focus instantly, but it doesn't allow me to fully press the shutter release instantly, which bothers me. I end up having to wait that extra moment and I don't like it. I know I can further prioritize the release of the shutter over the focus, but then I run the chance of getting slightly out of focus shots. I am curious if anyone can confirm if they are having the same issues. Again, it is ever so slight, but it bothers me that it is an issue at all. The AF assist should make the AF faster, not slower.

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,588
Members
24,805
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB