1DX2 RAW files various ISOs

Took a bunch of shots last night while waiting for the clouds to clear

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=918991569C43BAF8!2415&authkey=!ANM2sYlKfjpuRW4&ithint=folder%2c

There are 15 shots. Taken with a Rokinon 24mm f1.4

3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, 51200

3 bracketed shots trying to keep the exposures as close as possible

Hope these are of interest to some people

justification for buying a 5D4

Speaking personally, I can't justify buying a 5D4 in any terms other than "I want" because, well, I WANT a 5D4 even tho' I'm perfectly happy with my 5D3 and it's got plenty of life still in it and it's fully capable of doing everything I have wanted to do with it.

Given what you do with your current camera, what would be your reason/justification for buying a 5D4?

Help! 1DX II Cfast issues!

Got my new 1DX II. First photoshoot, 300 photos and 17 videos. Everything is good until I import the photos to Apple Aperture. The photos come as unsupported format with a question mark. After it's done. I realize the files are not right and go back to check the card and ALL the photos and videos are gone! Check the space available and it's 64GB!!! No images. Th images already on my computer are not usable. They show as cr2 but the size is 0x0. I can't use the videos although they show the correct time and MB count.
I tried using data recovery software but nothing sees the new Cfast card.
I had to download an app that did see the Cfast and recovered the files but they still are corrupted. I can open individual cr2 photos in photoshop but they don't have previews or icons. At least I can use them.
I'm desperate cause I lost a whole shoot. Videos won't open and lost money and time and I'm embarrassed with my client.
Does anybody know what repair viideo corruption app to use? I used all-i 59.94 fhd mov format.
Thanx in advance!
Patrick

Canon Medium Format Talk, It's Not in the Works

HTML:
Every few years we hear discussion about Canon and medium format, as noted by <a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/canon_medium_format_2ff.html">Northlight Images</a>, it usually happens in a Photokina year, which 2016 is. With <a href="http://www.++++++++rumors.com/sr3-new-sony-medium-format-rumor-101-megapixel-mirrorless-system-camera-at-photokina/">rumors of Sony</a> and Fuji entering the segment, the talk of what Canon’s plans are have come up again.</p>
<p>For the moment, Canon is paying attention to the medium format market, but have no currently plans or team in place to develop such a product. Canon has in the past made medium format sensors that top 250mp, but those were engineering samples.</p>
<p>Northlight notes that the “official” line from Canon is that there is lots of development possibilities with 35mm sensors. Not to mention, that the medium format segment likely wouldn’t be profitable.</p>
<p>We know that Canon has looked into medium format acquisitions as well as development, but it doesn’t look like we’re going to see them go beyond just tinkering.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

DPreview Canonized

So, I got banned for five days, for expressing my view on DPrev/Rishi´s reviews. I think it was a hard punishment for a message that wash´t too harsh, I think, but I admit that it wasn't a constructive statement, and I find that the one I made, does not belong in Canon Rumors. I owe Rishi an apology.

So I spent my banned period studying the debate in the treads where Rishi has participated the last week. I´ve noted that DPreview is thorough in their reviews, and they do emphasize weaknesses from all brands, not just Canon. That is a big reason why Rishi can defend DPr´s reviews seemingly well. Further, I find that it is partly the rhetorical angle that Preview use in their conclusions, along with their scoring system, and things they don´t emphasize, that is most upsetting to many Canon users. So asked myself, how would the A7RII conclusion look like if it were written by someone with a Canon bias, such as myself.

So this is the A7RII conclusion, rewritten. Points that I did´t care to rewrite are marked with strikethrough.

Conclusion - Pros
Impressive low light Raw performance, especially when images are downsized
Some photographers will appreciate the impressive dynamic range in Raw
Dramatically improved JPEGs, with sophisticated sharpening and well-controlled noise reduction
DRO and S-Log2 offer extensive dynamic range in JPEG
IBIS and electronic first curtain ensure ease of high resolution imaging
Continuous Eye-AF is very handy for portrait shooting
Autofocus with certain adapters work pretty well with third-party lenses
Provided you use very fast primes, low light continuous AF can compete with most DSLRs.
First full-frame mirrorless to come close to, in some particular situations, to challenge DSLR phase-detect systems
Industry leading AF frame coverage, but with poor manual controls to chose AF-points.
Offers silent shooting, though with some image noise cost
Extensive set of video support features including S-Log2, Zebras, and peaking
Sharp 4K footage especially from Super35 region of sensor
Face detection autofocus in video
Programmable Auto ISO implementation
One-touch AF point magnification in image review, making for quick focus check
Camera operation possible during USB charging - useful in emergencies

Conclusion - Cons
Unlike competing DSLRs from Nikon and Canon, no direct AF point control, which makes manual control over AF cumbersome
Lock-on AF still remains unpredictable and often unreliable
Camera focuses stopped down in AF-C, often crippling AF at small apertures or in low light
Eye-AF and Lock-on AF not available with 3rd party lenses, nor in video
Camera drops to 12-bit mode in continuous shooting, dropping dynamic range
Exposure parameters frozen while shutter is half-depressed (save for Dial EV Comp)
Viewfinder eye sensor is over-sensitive
Unlike Canon and Nikon, buttons and dials are either too small, recessed, or mushy
Inane interactions between menu items lead to poor experience and too many greyed out items
Buffer is sluggish to clear, making quick image review and focus check difficult
Video never shows low-light advantage of full frame sensor
No in-camera Raw conversion
No touchscreen
Very limited battery life, especially compared to DSLRs.

Overall Conclusion

Sony Alpha 7R II has impressive image quality, and have brought new and handy features, that we hope other manufacturers will implement. Our testing of the A7RII shows that it is very capable in quite a few situations, but it also has some serious shortcomings.

The A7RII has a few tricks up it´s sleeve. IBIS is a welcome addition in deed, and Eye-AF is very handy for portrait shooting. Further, continuous AF has improved. However, you can´t expect the uncompromised AF performance that you can from a DSLR. Unlike the A7RII, DSLRs work very well in (as good as) all shooting conditions, whether i´s still or moving objects, or the light is bad. Add to that, that the serious DSLR offerings has a direct AF-point controller, that makes it very easy for the photographer to choose were to focus. We find it very strange, that Sony has overlooked such a controller, when they at the same time offer the widest AF point covering seen in a full frame camera. (Arguably the dual pixel AF-system from Canon has wider covering when shooting in live view.)

In terms of handling and ergonomics, the A7RII still has a way to go, before it can compete with the much more refined offerings from Canon and Nikon. The A7RII´s bad menus, bad buttons and a general lack of response in many situations can have a very negative impact on the shooting experience. Canon on the other hand, often uses two, and sometimes three processors to handle both AF and captured images. Due to this, Canon cameras are always ready for whatever you want it to do. The A7RII will frustratingly often freeze up, sometimes at the wrong moment. This makes us wondering if the A7RII should have gone through more R&D and more testing, before release.

In terms of image quality, we must admit that the A7RII has impressed us. Dynamic range at low ISO is very impressive, although for most shooting, we rarely see the real world need for pushing shadows more than 3 stops. Only to the most DR demanding photographers, such as astrophotografers, we think high dynamic range could or should be a deciding factor, when deciding which camera to buy. In our opinion, a more important aspect of image quality is lens quality. Compared to the competition, Sony has a very immature selection of native lenses. Sure, they do offer the possibility to use third party lenses with an adapter, but we really don´t think that is a good solution. The poor ergonomics compared to DSLRs, makes using adapted lenses a bad option, because the lens-camera combo becomes very front heavy. Leica-lenses aren´t really a very good option either. For some reason, Sony uses a different filter stack than Leica, which makes many of the lenses perform bad in the corners, when adapted to the A7RII.

Of the few lenses Sony has released so far, one should be aware that unlike Canon, most of them has a a lot of copy to copy variation, so the chances that you get a bad copy, is quite big.

One should ale be aware that at least some of their lenses, the 24-70 f/4 and the 55 f/1.8 has proven to have frequent AF-failures. In this article from lens rentals, it says: "My paranoia increased when I saw that the linear electromagnetic focusing motors (LEMs) in the Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 and FE 55mm f/1.8 lenses broke a lot."

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2016/04/a-look-at-electromagnetic-focusing/

The problem with these two lenses, seem to relate to a bad choice of construction, where they use glue to attach moving parts in the AF-system, as described in this article:

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2015/04/tearing-down-the-sony-24-70-f4-za-oss-vario-tessar/

Sony has made other bad design choices in their lenses. In a tear down from Lensrentals.com, where they took apart Sony FE 35 f/1.4 ZA, they found heavy weather sealings everywhere, except in the lens mount, where it, arguably, matters the most. We wouldn't expect such an oversight even in a cheap chinese pirated copy of a lens.
https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2015/12/sony-fe-35mm-f1-4-za-lens-teardown/


The final word
Sony has brought a lot of good things with the A7RII, and is a worthy competitor to every full frame camera on the market, when it comes to pure image quality and for certain types of shooting. For the photographer that don´t need a camera that can handle every situation, that don´t need the ability to have full manual control over AF, and that can do with the lenses that are offered, the A7RII could be the right camera. However, before making the sizable investment that the A7RII and lenses is, even those shooters should take into consideration whether or not the questionable quality of some of Sony´s offerings, reflects on a risk that they are willing to take.

Lucky 1DX II Owners- lenses used and comments please?

Congratulations to all who have received a new 1DXII.

I would like to know if anyone has looked at lens performance with the new body. Specifically, has anyone looked at performance of the 70-200 f4L IS VS the 70-200 f2.8 II? How do the lenses perform in terms of focusing speed, is, and image creation?

Also, anyone like to comment on lenses used on your new camera? How do your favorite lenses compare to other camera bodies that you were shooting.

Thanks, I'll be eager to hear of your real world evaluation.

sek

All day wedding with the 1DX mark ii

I am a wedding photographer who has shot with the 1Dx for the last 3 years. I also have a 5DSr. I received the 1DX mark ii this week and just returned from my all day wedding and just thought I would share some observations from having it in a lot of different lighting scenarios.

The focus on this camera is extremely fast and accurate. It is noticeably better than the 1DX. It locks on in dark areas of the reception and even shooting into the sun it did a fantastic job. I had very few missed focus shots and I am a rapid fire shooter and don't always use the best technique the I am moving around quickly on the dance floor.

The DPAF is just as fast and accurate as the OVF auto focus. I would say that it is actually better. I couldn't find anything that it had issues focusing on. This made composing difficult shots a lot easier. I could hold the camera over my head or closer to walls and fire off perfect shots. This made my work a little more diverse and I was able to do things I couldn't do before with the 1DX or even the 5DSr. Getting the camera away from your eye can give you a lot more variety and different points of view.

The colors are gorgeous and very similar to the 5DSr. I have always love the colors on the 5DSr and am happy the 1DX mark II has similar colors and tones.

Like the 5DSr the auto white balance is much more accurate.

The images are clean and the shadow noise has been reduced considerably.

ISO 25,600 is as clean as ISO 12,800 on the 1DX.

I really haven't opened a lot of images to look at closely however, I feel like after shooting well over a hundred weddings I can get a pretty good idea of how a camera is doing by shooting with it and reviewing images on the back of the camera.

1dx mk2 4k outputting 1080p?

I understand that the 1dx mk2 does not output uncompressed 4k over HDMI. I was videoing a graduation today when I realized that I needed more focal length. I was using a 70-200 with the 2x III extender. I remembered that the 4k had a 1.4x crop. I couldnt use it internally bc the graduation would be around 2 hours. I connected it to my Atomos Ninja blade however it doesnt do 4k. so I set the camera to 4k 29.97 and the atomos to record in 1080P 29.97. Surprising to me the atomos received the signal. I watched the video afterwards and it looks no different quality wise than the uncompressed 1080P coming from the HDMI. So my question is....what is coming through that HDMI to the Atomos when the camera is set to 4k. If it is 1080P what am I losing compared to the 1dx mk2's normal uncompressed 1080P stream.

Canon imagePROGRAF 1000

I finally got my Pro-1000 today. Unpacking, installation and setup took about 30 minutes, including the waiting time for the printer to align. I downloaded and installed the ICC for Canson Baryta paper and had my first print out within the hour.I am no print expert, but the quality that came out on default setup was fantastic.

I am sure many others here on CR has this printer now. Any experiences to share, things to do and things to avoid, papers to use and papers to stay away from etc.?

Dogs in FLIGHT (DIF)

I take a lot of action pics of dogs and some of my favourite are when they are off the ground. I've been meaning to start this post for sometime and finally got around to it as it's raining outside..! Here are a few of mine...

Share your DIF shots here..!

Attachments

  • IMG_2006.jpg
    IMG_2006.jpg
    149 KB · Views: 304
  • IMG_6050.jpg
    IMG_6050.jpg
    172 KB · Views: 303
  • IMG_2812.jpg
    IMG_2812.jpg
    82.8 KB · Views: 282
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Patent: Cinema EOS 37.5-100mm t/3.3 Anamorphic Lens

HTML:
Canon has filed an optical formula patent for a Cinema EOS 37.5-100mm f/3.3 Anamorphic lens.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2016-57445</p>
<ul>
<li>Published 2016.4.21</li>
<li>Filing date 2014.9.9</li>
<li>Zoom ratio 2.67</li>
<li>Focal length 37.5 56.2 100.0</li>
<li>F-number 3.3 3.3 3.3</li>
<li>Half angle of view (degrees) 11.49 7.72 4.36</li>
<li>The image height 7.62 7.62 7.62</li>
<li>The total lens length 259.95 259.95 259.95</li>
<li>BF 38.25 38.25 38.25</li>
<li>Anamorphic optical system</li>
</ul>
<p>What is an anamorphic lens?</p>
<blockquote><p>Anamorphic lenses are specialty tools which affect how images get projected onto the camera sensor. They were primarily created so that a wider range of aspect ratios could fit within a standard film frame, but since then, cinematographers have become accustomed to their unique look. This article discusses the key considerations with anamorphic lenses in the digital era.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.red.com/learn/red-101/anamorphic-lenses">You can read more about anamorphic lenses over at RED</a></p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

Cherry Point Air Show

Over the weekend I attended my first airshow at the Marine Corps air base in Cherry Point, NC. It was full of all sorts of drama... exhaustion the first night and sleeping the in the car, locking the keys in the car after arriving Saturday morning (along with all my camera gear), and just dealing with the crowds in general. I've only gone through about 1/3 of my photos from the show, but so far I'm really happy with what I have:

Lucas Oil Pitts Special - Cherry Point Airshow by Ron Yorgason, on Flickr

Corkscrew - Cherry Point Airshow by Ron Yorgason, on Flickr

Sunset - Cherry Point Airshow by Ron Yorgason, on Flickr

Propeller Vapor Trails - Cherry Point Airshow by Ron Yorgason, on Flickr

Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT II Coming Soon [CR2]

HTML:
<p>We’re told that Canon will be updating their Speedlite 600EX-RT shortly, likely next week alongside the EF-M 28mm f/3.5 IS STM Macro lens.</p>
<p>We have no specifications on the new flash, but as soon as we hear any, we’ll pass them on. I wouldn’t be upset to see a reduction in size.</p>
<p>More to come…</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>

First photos taken with a brand new camera body

With all of the anticipation and minute-counting going on for those of you who are getting the new 1D... does anyone have a plan for the very first 0001 capture with that camera?

Anyone have a habit of photographing the same things with the first few snaps out of the box for any camera body?

Mine is usually a picture of the floor in the room where I'm standing while I look at the back of the camera like it is something from outer space and as if I have never held a camera before and am unfamiliar with a shutter release button. ;D

1DX mark II Auto Focus

I have been doing a few tests with the 1DX mark ii and I have to say that the DPAF is unreal. I set up a shot in almost darkness (where I had issues seeing myself) to test out the noise at ISO 51000. I was able to achieve focus with the center focus point (the most sensitive one) fairly easily, but at at times it did hunt a little. However, when I switched to live view not only did the still life become easier to see with the exposure simulated screen, I was able to focus anywhere instantly, and I mean instantly and accurately. To get an idea of how dark it was, a shot that was still a little underexposed was ISO 51,000 f/2.8 and 1/30, much darker than I will ever experience at a wedding. I am blown away at how crazy fast and accurate this DPAF is. I wish I could find a way to use it more in my shooting style. Anyone else finding the same thing?

Canon EF 24-70mm f4L IS USM

Going by the recommended lenses for the Canon 5DS that Canon published I purchased the EF24-70mm f4L IS USM for mainly landscape use I didnt need f2.8.
This was back in September 2015 and Ive never been entirely blown away by the results so whilst conducting other tests yesterday using one of Canon Cine lenses I mounted this lens on the 5DS and shot some tests on an Essar Test Chart Sphere using a CIPA High resolution chart. The Sphere provides complete even field illumination and the chart is back-lit. Test are carried out in a dark room with the Essar Sphere providing the only light. For video we can show the results on a cinema sized screen (55ft diagonal) in 4K. For this particular test the images were processed in Light Room and viewed on a 27" 4K monitor again in a darkened room.
The test showed two problems a. image shift and b. softness even centre frame at its optimum f8 on a Canon 5DS full resolution raw file at 50mm. The results were marginally better at 70mm and 24mm but certainly the limiting factor in accessing the full resolution the 5DS can acheive. CA were not well controlled.
Maybe this is a rouge lens but Photozone. de had exactly the same issues when they tested the lens a number of years ago so why Canon thinks this lens is suitable for the 5DS / r is beyond me.

5DSR Focus issues

My apologies if I did not go back far enough to see any previous discussion but has any forum members had issues with the 5DSR regarding focus issues. I've experiences an ongoing frustration with this body used on my Canon 600 and 800mm as I use it for wildlife "stills", (i'm use 1DX for action on 400mm f2,8 IS MKII). The 5DSR seems a very hit and miss affair but when you really magnify the images down, some are so sharp you could cut yourself and others are as if looking through a coke bottle or putting vaseline on the objective lens. I can put the focus point bang on the animals eye and yet at 1/4000th sec and f6.3 and resting on window or monopod ...yet they're soft. I took it to CPS in Dubai and they say they adjusted the camera but its made no difference. I tried the camera settings to adjust for the particular lens used but no appreciable difference. I've tried a little experimenting with adjusting front or back focussing but nothing scientific. Its just frustrating having to take more than you need pictures on the hope that one is a keeper.

I just wonder if because of the high pixels, that it shows what ever imperfections in my settings or shooting style. I don't get any issues with my 1DX on same lens's so it has to be the 5Dsr body. Anyone care to comment or share experiences ?

Thanks
Mark

1Dx mk2 arrived

Two 1Dx mk 2 arrived today.
Unreal high ISO performance and fast as hell.

For those of us who need SD cards at times, save your cash, the DeLock CFast to SD card adapter is not compatible at this time. Hopefully in some future firmware update that will get fixed.

Attachments

  • 2755.jpg
    2755.jpg
    162.3 KB · Views: 173

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,439
Messages
973,604
Members
24,804
Latest member
chrisgphoto

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB