7D MkII slow to wake up

A couple of weeks ago I picked up a gripped 7DII and overall can report that I'm liking it more than I expected. Probably done half a dozen jobs with it so far as second body to the 5DIII.

Last night at a job it was being slow to "wake up", it felt like 3-5 seconds, an eternity when there is a great shot vanishing in front of you...the moment missed. Weird thing is that this is intermittent, but hugely annoying and distracting from the smooth flow of a job.

I'll be taking the body straight to CPS, but just wondering if this is a known syndrome with 7DII bodies. FWIW the lens used was 70-200 f/2.8isII, 600EX-RT. GPS was switched off.

-pw

Charge through USB?

I wonder why the cameras don't charge through the USB connection? I'm now on small trip and was too lazy to bring charger, so it'd be great even if it'd slowly trickle charge through USB, I could easily leave it charge overnight.

Short answer is that the camera don't have the charging HW installed, so next question is that why not, they don't really take up that much space in cell phones, and similar amount of charging current would be already plenty.

Any cameras that do this?

Need help deciding what to sell

I have the following
Canon 1dx
16-35 f4
24-70 2.8
70-200 2.8
100-400 vii
85 1.2
50mm 1.8 stm
600 exrt

I have done very little with most of my gear this year as my career has been busy. I just recently took a position where I will be moving across the country and taking the family with. I will be working on my new job and finding a home for the first 6 months. I know many camera's will be announced. I am hoping for a smaller 6d size body updated with better af and dual pixel sensor for video. I have a chance to sell all of this for most of my investment. I am curious if anyone has any suggestions on how I can still have a camera but not so much gear. Other thoughts are getting a 6d and 24-70 f4 for the time being.

DigitalRev buying experience?

I'm looking into buying a 70-200mm for 1K. It's between the Tamron 2.8 VC and the Canon f4 IS. DigitalRev is selling the Tamron for $1,000 where as everywhere else is 1399...so is this a White market lens? It doesn't say that on the digitalrev site so I'm trying to figure out if it is the US version that comes with a 6 year warranty.
I would just go with the Canon f4 IS but at 1K I could get the Tamron.

Thoughts?
Thanks

  • Locked
Help me choose: Canon G7X or Sony RX100 IV

During last year, my wife is shooting more as before. Her Nikon Coolpix S6500 needs to be replaced. So I was thinking about a new compact camera as a gift for Xmas.

She likes to photograph landscapes and portraits of family and kids. No need for large FL, 100 is more then sufficient. I would love to see here photos in Raw, because this gives me more possibility for combining here photos with mine after holiday/safari. So IQ has importance for that reason. For the same reason, I would love to see a Av or M modus, so that even when I didn't have one of my cameras, I have the possibility to control the exposure. She will however use this camera mostly in Auto or SCN mode.

I like in the Canon range the G7X. This really looks a nice camera for here. Compact, easy to place in a handbag. Touchscreen, but only usable above peoples head by turning the device 180degr, because the LED can only be moved in one direction. Build in EVF. Very nice lens with 24-100mm zoom and fast 1.8-2.8 aperture. The SCN scenes are only 5 to choose from. There is no dedicated Landscape or Panorama modus.


The Sony RX100 IV does also look a tempting camera to me. About the same size as the Canon. No touchscreen, but the LED of this camera can be moved 180degr upwards, but also 45 degrees downwards. Build in EVF. Lens with 24-70mm zoom, and fast 1.8-2.8 aperture, however the Canon seems to be faster as the switching points to other apertures happens further in tele reach. Nice build in Panorama function, almost like Iphone. SCN mode with portrait, sport, landscape, sunset, macro,... all easy reachable for her.

Money is not the issue in this case.

Who can give me some advice based on your own experiences with one of these camera, please not based on what you can read on internet.

So every practical advice/opinion about one of these 2 camera is really appreciated to help me take the right decision.

Thanks,

Francois

Tripod foot plate on 100-400mm II coming loose

My wife and I carry our 100-400mm II plus 7DII or 5DIII on a Black Rapid strap, fixed through both the camera and lens in case one or the other become detached and to spread the load. This precaution became important as I found the fixing plate for a tripod foot has become loose. It is held by just four screws, which look pretty flimsy. All four on one plate had become partly unscrewed. So a warning to all.

Does anyone know the correct screwdriver for tightening these screws, after using Loctite (Mt Spokane?).

Attachments

  • IMG_1827.JPG
    IMG_1827.JPG
    262.9 KB · Views: 399
  • IMG_1832.JPG
    IMG_1832.JPG
    244.5 KB · Views: 325

Update on the Canon USA vs Grey Market Retailers Legal Action

HTML:
According to Photography Bay, Canon USA has filed an amended complaint against F&E Trading (BigValueInc, Electronic Valley & Others).</p>
<p>Photography Bay explains the amended complaint:</p>
<blockquote><p>In its Amended Complaint, Canon USA doesn’t really add on any additional egregious actions, but rather takes aim at pinning the alleged misconduct on Albert Houllou, who appears to be the principal owner/operator of F & E Trading.</p>
<p>As someone who used to practice corporate law, I can tell you that it is always a big win to get an individual (typically an owner or executive) on the hook for the wrongdoing (aka “piercing the corporate veil”). This allows the plaintiff (<em>e.g.</em>, Canon USA) to hold a person (not just a company) personally liable for the wrongdoing. If you can get at a person’s assets, then you can apply a whole lot more pressure in settlement negotiations or drive them into bankruptcy.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Photography Bay, the following YouTube video is being cited by Canon USA as proof that Albert Houllou is the controlling party for all of the companies’ actions.</p>
<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/i1i-R563tdg" width="728" height="409" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2015/12/06/canon-v-gray-market-retailers-lawsuits-update/" target="_blank">Read the full breakdown</a> and view the amended complaint at Photography Bay.</p>

What is your recommendation or request for a photo gift this season?

Kinda tired of all the regurgitated bickering threads so here is some more lighthearted fodder.

What are you either going to buy for somebody, or hope to receive this season, and do you have any out of the box recommendations for others to give as gifts?

To buy: I have to find a camera that gives better than phone quality but can send those images direct to a phone. Doesn't the G5X do that?

To get: Nothing, I am pretty happy at this point, though am awaiting that 1DX mkII announcement to see if I am going that way or the 5DSR.

Recommendation for others: Canon Selphy CP910 printer. I recently did a trip to Central America and being able to print images for people on the spot is a game changer for the type of images I often shoot. But it is incredibly versatile, it can print from any WiFi device and has an SD slot, it makes it's own 'hotspot' so no network is needed, it can run off a battery, you can do basic edits on it or in your camera, you can connect your camera direct to it to do edits, crops, etc and then use that print button! Don't laugh, my 1DS MkIII has never seen so much menu action ;D It is small and light enough to take away if you want or just stick in a camera bag and take to family functions etc. It doesn't have inkjet nozzles to clog. Prints are what photography is all about, people LOVE prints. It costs less than $90!!!!!!

So lets hear yours.........

lens/body combos for birds

I have a question about body lens combos for bird photography.

I mainly do landscapes, but some birds as well.

I did have a 7d, which I used with my 70-300L with decent results for birds. I sold the 7d, and have since been shooting birds with my 5d3 and the 70-300L. Obviously the reach is not there, but the low light performance is expectedly better. But I need at least 400 mm reach for birds.

I am wondering about 2 options........the 7d2 is VERY cheap now, about 1K with current printer bundle. So option 1 is to get the 7d2 and keep shooting birds with the 70-300L.

The second is to get a 100-400L II, forgo the crop body, and shoot with that lens and the 5d3.


I am planning on getting a 5dsr or 5d4 for landscapes in the next 6-12 months, depending on what the 5d4 turns out to look like. If I end up with a 5dsr, then I'd keep the 5d3 for it's greater FR for the limited birding I do.

Any thoughts appreciated, especially from anyone who has already went through this type of decision making.

Thanks.

What's your "lens that won't be made"

When I wake up before my alarm goes off (practically daily) my mind starts going like a train leaving the station. If I can get back to sleep before it picks up too much steam, I'm good to go. More often however, it slowly starts going, picks up speed, and within a few minutes is racing along the countryside thinking of anything and everything conceivable.

This morning, somehow I started thinking about my lens usage. I have the following prime lenses for my 6D:

EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art

EF 85mm f/1.8 USM

EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM

EF 135mm f/2L USM

Then I started thinking about the fact that realistically, I could easily get along without the 85mm f/1.8 because the 100mmL is such a similar focal length and has IS to boot, and typically I stop the 85 down to at least 2.2 and usually 2.5 or 2.8. All that would really hold me back is the very fast focusing of the 85 which comes in handy when photographing my daughter (and when he becomes mobile) my son at play.

I also then started thinking about the fact that my favorite lens and focal length is truly the 135mmL and that I really only use the 35 and 50 indoors, more out of necessity than love of the focal length.

Finally, I thought about a tip I read one time regarding lens selection that, when deciding what focal length to purchase next, a person should consider halving, or doubling their current prime lens because that is such a significant leap that it provides some real value and versatility.

Then my mind went back to my least used lens, the 35mm f/2 IS USM. Double that focal length would be 70mm. That's close enough to 85mm, in my mind, that if I had a 70mm lens, I could probably do without the 85. Also... taking 70mm and doubling THAT would roughly be back to my favorite lens, the 135mmL. So... MY personal "lens that won't be made" but I'd buy in a heartbeat is...

35-70mm f/2L IS USM (or STM if there was no speed penalty in focusing). That's a 2x zoom range, so it's long enough to be useful but not so long that a very fast aperture (for a zoom lens) is prohibitive. It doesn't really give up much to many of the popular lenses in terms of aperture (the 35 f/2 lenses, 50 f/1.8, and 85 f/1.8 are the same, or 1/3 of a stop difference). And finally, it covers very common angles of view from (barely) wide angle to normal to (barely) short telephoto.

For this lens to be of use to someone like me, it would need to be of a similarly high image quality to Canon's latest L series glass. And of course the price would match - lol.

For me, I think I'd still rarely use the lens, simply due to my focal length preferences. But I'd be willing to pay handsomely to trim my lens collection from 3 lenses that (arguably) cover this (rough) focal range down to one, with little to no loss in wide open ability, and likely result in an improvement. And that's coming from someone who basically never uses zoom lenses. For me, I rarely use the 35 and 50 so being able to have a zoom cover both would be very valuable, especially when using the telephoto end, as I would do most of the time.

With my vast experience designing lenses in my head with absolutely zero real world experience or education, I'd assume that despite this lens having a large aperture, it could be made relatively small (for a zoom and especially for a zoom with a large aperture). Consider that the 35 f/2 IS, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 are all small-to-medium sized lenses. I would think that a 35-70mm f/2L IS could be the same size or possibly smaller than the 24-70 f/2.8L II.

I don't think this lens will be made because the 24-70 lenses are so popular. Personally, I'd prefer a shorter zoom range with a larger aperture.

A 35-70mm f/2L IS USM plus the 135mm f/2L would be a dream combo for me. That's a 4x "zoom range" (yes, I know 71-134 is missing) at f/2 and would allow me to utilize my favorite lens almost all the time, but not miss out on the normal focal length range when I occasionally need it, and do so without necessitating 4 lenses.

So... what's YOUR "lens that won't be made". I'd love to hear about it, why it won't be made, but why you'd love it!

Patent: A Few More Image Sensor Patents from Canon

HTML:
<p><a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_rumours.html" target="_blank">Northlight Images</a> has posted 3 more patents and a simple breakdown of each.</p>
<p>From Northlight:</p>
<ul>
<li>Patent shows more tricks you can do with split pixels for AF [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09204067">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Patent about dividing longer exposures into shorter ones and adding them together [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=09204055">USPTO</a>]</li>
<li>Patent about moving the sensor micro lens array forwards/backwards to match up with main lens [<a href="http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=09201289">USPTO</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p>We all expect the next generation of full frame Canon sensors to be a big leap forward in performance. In our opinion, Canon has no other choice.</p>

Watch a 4-year-old drive a dump truck by remote control

OK, it's been a while since I had this much fun watching a 2 minute video. This should really make your day!

This link briefly explains it and then scroll down to the YouTube video.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/04/4-year-old-remote-drive-dump-truck/

Lots of overhead drone video, GoPro, etc. They obviously put a LOT of work into this promotion!! Enjoy!

Attachments

  • volve-truck-girl-2015-12-04-01.jpg
    volve-truck-girl-2015-12-04-01.jpg
    85.2 KB · Views: 242

Sony and Toshiba Sign Definitive Agreements for the Transfer of Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities

HTML:
<strong>Tokyo, Japan, December 4th, 2015</strong> — Based on the memorandum of understanding entered into between Sony Corporation (“Sony”) and Toshiba Corporation (“Toshiba”) on October 28, 2015, the parties today announced that they have signed definitive agreements to transfer to Sony and to Sony Semiconductor Corporation (“SCK”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony, certain Toshiba-owned semiconductor fabrication facilities, equipment and related assets in its Oita Operations facility, as well as other related equipment and assets owned by Toshiba (the “Transfer”).</p>
<p>Under the agreements, Toshiba will transfer semiconductor fabrication facilities, equipment and related assets of Toshiba’s 300mm wafer production line, mainly located at its Oita Operations facility. The purchase price of the Transfer is 19 billion yen. Sony and Toshiba aim to complete the Transfer within the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016, subject to any required regulatory approvals.</p>
<p>Following the Transfer, Sony and SCK plan to operate the semiconductor fabrication facilities as fabrication facilities of SCK, primarily for manufacturing CMOS image sensors.</p>
<p>The parties expect to offer the employees of Toshiba and its affiliates employed at the fabrication facilities to be transferred, as well as certain employees involved in areas such as CMOS image sensor engineering and design (approximately 1,100 employees in total), employment within the Sony Group, upon the completion of the Transfer.</p>
<p><strong>Outline of 300mm wafer fabrication facilities, Toshiba Oita Operations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Building completion: February, 2004</li>
<li>Location: 3500 Oaza Matsuoka, Oita City, Oita Prefecture, Japan</li>
<li>Building area: 24,100 m2</li>
<li>Total floor space: 48,800 m2</li>
<li>Main products: CMOS image sensors, memory controllers</li>
</ul>

What's the expected life time of a pro EOS body?

For example, if one decides to stick with a 5Dmk2, how long would it be before the camera would be the equivalent of a brick?

As long as the camera is manufactured, one could have it fixed. But how long would spare parts stock last?

Worse, if the camera never breaks, how long would batteries (OEM or 3rd party) be available? Once those aren't manufactured anymore, one's stock of batteries would no longer take charge, and even a camera in perfect working order would become inert.

2015 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

What a weekend!!! I took me days to recover from the muscle fatigue, the 3 litre beer towers didn't help with that either ;D
Anyhoo, here's a whole range of images from iconic people to the actual racing from a fantastic weekend, I hope you enjoy them.

Attachments

  • 995A8964.jpg
    995A8964.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 255
  • 995A9028.jpg
    995A9028.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 279
  • 995A9031.jpg
    995A9031.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 274

Lastolite Triflector

Does anyone here have a Lastolite Triflector? I've been doing loads of portraits lately, and I typically put a reflector under the face and to the side. However, I sort of clip things to stands and have the subject hold the one under their face, so I'd really like to get something a bit easier and more professional.

It seems like the Triflector is a genius piece of kit, but I can't find much on it other than the stuff that Lastolite puts out. So I was just hoping for some feedback from people who have used it. Thanks.

New Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 IS is *less* sharp than prior (non-IS) version?

I'm loathe to link DXO lens reviews here, but I found this interesting:

http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/AF-S-Nikkor-24-70mm-f-2.8E-ED-VR-Review-Updated-Nikon-standard-zoom-for-press-weddings-portraits-and-events/Nikon-24-70mm-f-2.8E-vs-Nikon-24-70mm-f-2.8G

Uncle Rog at LR also looked at the old and new Nikon 24-70 versions and flagged that at 24 and 50mm, Nikon appears to have deprioritized center sharpness to improve corner sharpness:

http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2015/10/nikon-24-70mm-f2-8-ed-af-s-vr-sharpness-optical-bench-testing

Fascinating. Though it's not exactly what was reported, would you trade a 10% reduction in center sharpness for a 25% improvement in corner sharpness? (I imagine the answer varies on what you are shooting...)

- A

Patent: Subdividing High & Low Sensitivity Pixels

HTML:
<p><a href="http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/cameras/Canon_rumours.html" target="_blank">Northlight Images</a> breaks down a sensor patent from Canon that shows a way to subdivide high and low sensitivity pixels.</p>
<blockquote><p>Echoing a Nikon patent from November last year (7th) Canon look at ways of subdividing pixels into high and low sensitivity sub pixels or even high/medium/low triplets</p>
<p>“Variations of this approach have been tried by numerous manufacturers, going back to Fuji nearly 10 years ago. Designing the pixels is one thing, making all the rest of the circuitry to process the information for every pixel has been slower to appear.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I suspect we’re going to see new sensor tech to improve sensitivity performance in the upcoming EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS 5D Mark IV. There is probably going to be a lot more sensor tech patents showing up over the new few months as the cameras get closer to launch.</p>

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,440
Messages
973,674
Members
24,805
Latest member
track inspector

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB