• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

  • Locked
5DM3 auto lighting optimizer and high ISO NR

Does anybody know this:

Auto Lighting Optimizer
Does the auto lighting optimizer get applied to raw images? The book says (p 142) that "with jpeg images, the correction is applied when the image is captured." To me that implies that the raw correction is applied at a different time. Thoughts? Or is it not applied at all to a raw image? Would it be applied to a DPP raw but not a DNG conversion?

Next up.
High ISO NR
This is a very misleading menu title in my opinion. The menu title says "high" but the book (p 143) says the NR is applied to all ISO speeds. Raw images that are viewed in camera have NR that "looks minimal." Does DPP add to the minimal NR automatically? Is there minimal NR applied to a DNG converted raw?

Thanks for any info.
Canon's instruction manual is as awesome as their DPP software. :)

-MS

  • Locked
How About This Canon?

This is a camera I'd love to see Canon make. (Well not at $6,000 obviously)

http://photorumors.com/2012/03/26/rumor-hasselblad-to-introduce-a-new-family-of-digital-cameras-at-photokina-digital-x-pan/

Seriously, a digital panoramic would be terrific. Fuji has a panoramic option for in-camera stitching with the X-10 which is the second best thing. I'd much rather have a panoramic option than the "double-exposure" thingy that Canon has been adding.

What do others think?

  • Locked
5D MK III Soft Images Even When Changing Settings in DPP

Hi Everyone,

Like everyone else who is "upgrading" from a 7D to the new MK III I was excited. Now not so much. I've read where the softness issue was because of faulty software (DPP) so I changed the setting. Maybe someone can explain why this image isn't tack sharp. You can clearly see where the auto-focus is. Here are the stats:

5D MK III
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
f/5 1/500 s
ISO 100 @ 200mm

100% Crop

So what's the issue? Why is this not tack sharp? I have one of the best lenses Canon makes, their newest camera and I'm feeling severe buyer's remorse. So much that I'm thinking of taking it back and getting the D800 or D4. Even though I have a ton of Canon glass. Any help understanding what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.

Soft.png


I've never posted here so I don't know if you'll be able to click the image or not so here's the direct link: http://www.theskinsfactory.com/tsf-clients/Soft.png

  • Locked
CANON 1Dx - New presentation & video -

Hellou Canon lovers, especially future owners of 1Dx (myself included) ;D

I don't know if someone put these videos before on Canon forum, please forgive me if you have watched this. ???

I'm sending 2 links:

1) New presentation from Ashley McLaughlin -

http://youtu.be/2WuUmbAcK_c

and

2) Story about one day in Gran Canaria from Bruno Barbey Canon photographer, filmed entirely on Canon EOS 1Dx.

http://youtu.be/dWUh8PnJaFU

Something to watch while we waiting for great & final reviews of 1Dx. ;D

Archangel72

  • Locked
EF-S 15-85?

I am considering getting a EFS 15-85 lens to go along with and or replace my efs 18-135.
I already have a ef70-300 USM and a Prime 35 and 50 a macro 100mm and a 12-24 Ultrawide.

Any thought if a Better replacement lens is coming? Just hate to buy and then the mkII hits the shelves.

Comments?

Ron

  • Locked
Do you trust these online HK/china online stores?

Annoyed that i spent the last 5mins typing out paragraphs inly for it to be deleted

Do you trust them enough with your credit/debit card details? No doubt they're grey imports without canon warranty. I think they might not even be grey imports but just knock offs. Is that possible?

canon 50mm 1.8 is $18.66 (including a $10 discount)

5dmkiii (body only) = $3414.01
24-70 2.8 mki = $1262.42
17-55 2.8 IS = $809.55



EDIT: I removed the link. go google Camera Paradise and tell me what you think

  • Locked
Whats a good walk around lens to put on a new 5d Mk iii

I am going to buy a new 5d mkiii and am uncertain about the kit lens, its 10 years old ish and was wondering about getting the new 24-70 but at 28oz its quite heavy without IS so I am stuck. I have a 70 to 200 mkii IS and a 100 macro IS so am looking to supplement what I have. Second question is, I am looking for a good wide angle, 16-35mm or 14mm. Any and all suggestions would help thanks

  • Locked
Patent: Canon EF 2.8x Teleconverter

HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9335"></g:plusone></div><div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin: 0 0px 0 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9335" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=9335"></a></div>
<strong>Patent Time


</strong>A patent showing a new teleconverter has made an appearance. It appears to be a 2.7 or 2.8x TC. What effect woud it have on aperture? A 400 f/2.8L IS II would become 1120mm at f/8. All well and good, but the missing f/8 autofocus on the 1D X makes this one a bit strange with the current line of camera bodies.</p>
<p><strong>Patent Publication No. 2012-47869</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>2012.3.8 Release Date</li>
<li>2010.8.25 filing date</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example 1</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>-83.98mm focal length</li>
<li>Expansion rate β = 1.996</li>
<li>Lens Construction 5 group nine</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Example 3</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>-41.91mm focal length</li>
<li>Expansion rate β = 2.779</li>
<li>Lens Construction 5 group nine</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canon’s patent</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Rear converter is to increase the focal length, F number, the residual aberration</li>
<li>When doubled, twice the lateral aberration, longitudinal aberration is 4 times greater rate of expansion, because the F-number is also double, longitudinal aberration is twice per depth of focus</li>
<li>Rear converter configuration consisting of three groups of positive and negative positive</li>
<li>Reduce the aberration of the rear converter itself</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2012-03-26" target="_blank">EG</a>]</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

  • Locked
Another 5D3 ISO comparison

I just took delivery of mine, and whilst it looks to be an awesome camera I really can't say I'm impressed with the ISO improvements over the 1Ds3.

Generally I never shoot above ISO3200...not because I don't want to, but because of the noise level. I was hoping the 5D3 would be of some improvement over the 1Ds3 and in a way it is.
Silent shooting really is almost silent for example. But with all the noise reduction disabled I don't consider the 5D3 to be even 1 stop better in noise handling over the 1ds3:

5d3iso.jpg


Note also that the 1Ds3 technically only goes to 1600, the 3200 option is a 'H' mode.

These are all from in camera Jpegs too, to rule out the Raw convertor.
However, the files are much more robust and maleable.

  • Locked
5D Mk III - No Problems (official thread)

Since the 5D III was released, all that I'm reading here is about problems. It's pretty normal that that happens, the people who is happy with the camera is not going to post much stuff, they rather be outside taking photos ;) anyways, point is that after reading here all of this complains (I'm ok with them, do not misunderstand me) I'm kind of getting the impression that the 5D mk III is not so good.

So, my question is:

Is there anyone happy with the camera? Do you find it to be a big step forward from the Mk II?


Cheers! :)

  • Locked
5d mark iii, a few complaints

Hey everyone, just a few complaints about the 5d3... NO not soft images, some simple lens calibration and the thing is a beast!!! my issues are more technical, one, the rating button is useless!! what a waste!!! next, whats with the magnification button being on the side?? is there any way to go back to the way I view my images on my lcd like I do on my 7d?!?! Lastly, great that there are so many autofocus points, but they are so crowded in the middle!!! Wish I could spot focus a bit further out in the frame away from the middle....

  • Locked
New lens vs 3x600ex-RT

I have three 600ex-rt on preorder and the st-e3-rt. I've been thinking, for the money I could instead get the 24mm TSE, the fishy zoom, or the Zeiss 18mm.

I have the 16-35II, 24-105 and 70-200/2.8, and two older flashes, plus the 5dmkii. I like shooting wide most of the time, and tight family portraits. I hate using the optical wireless, and need more flashes anyhow (have been holding out for RT). The three lenses are also on my list, but no immediate need with the 16-35.

I could use some advice, since I'm not buying a 2012 body (so have budget), which purchase do you think will give the most chance to develop and explore? It seems like the flashes are the logical step, but a new lens might be a good direction, (especially a prime) and yes I don't want third party wireless.

  • Locked
Which lenses need micro-adjusting?

I don't know a whole lot on this topic bt Im just wondering which lens are more prone to having to get taken to a camera shop to be micro-adjusted? I ask this becuase I want to save a few hundred $$$ or so and buy some lens (and other gear) online since it's cheaper.

All does it all depend on the copy of the lens you get that isnt tack sharp at all apertures/how it performs with your camera? And does it cost extra $ to get it adjusted?

  • Locked
5D Mark III vs. D800... what comparisons do you want to see?

I told my buddy I wouldn't post this yet, since we'll be working on a thorough review and comparison of both bodies... but I couldn't wait. ;D

IMG_3082.jpg


We're going to be spending at least the rest of the week with both cameras, testing them in a variety of conditions. However, we would like some input if there are any specific comparisons you would like to see. How should we test for those comparisons? We appreciate your suggestions.

We played with them for a couple hours today, but I'm not going to tell you my initial thoughts just yet, since we're working on a more formal writeup. You may be surprised (both Canon and Nikon folks). Thanks!

  • Locked
A couple of questions about tripods.

A couple of questions about tripods.

Question 1:

I'm in the process of seriously upgrading my kit from my lowly Canon 1000D, having just placed an order for a 5D3, and am about to buy a 16-35mm and 70-200mm from the Canon L series lenses. Up till now, when doing landscapes/seascapes at the beach, I've used my clunky, flimsy, cheap tripod I got from Dick Smith (general electronics store in Australia) for $30.

Now, a couple of contradictory factors have me wondering what other folks do.

On one hand, now that my upgraded gear is going to be worth so much more, I'm certainly thinking it would be pretty unwise to be mounting it on this old tripod. Score 1 for getting a new, better tripod.

On the other hand, at the moment because my existing tripod is soooo crappy, I have no hesitation in actually placing its feet in the shallow water when I'm getting a shot (example). I hardly bother cleaning the legs of it afterwards. If I invest in some fancy Manfrotto (or other) tripod, I'm not so sure I'll be so free and easy about letting the water and sand on it. I dunno, maybe that's being too precious, but score 1 for keeping the crappy one.

So, my question is: what do other folks do? Do you put your expensive tripod in the water? Am I dreaming that the old crappy tripod will even hold a 5D3 & 16-35? (I always, even with the 1000D, have the strap around my neck while the camera is on the tripod)


Question 2:

This question is more about the difference between various tripods. I've played around in camera shops a bit with some big name tripods. One which was by no means the most expensive, had a ball and handle mechanism where you squeezed the handle and had 2 dimensions of free movement just from that, with a 3rd up/down control. All the others seemed to be just more well-made versions of what I already have: separate controls for each direction of movement; I find this a bit of a hassle now and wonder why they don't all have the ball mechanism.

Can someone please explain the difference between the various mechanisms, perhaps with some pros/cons of each?

cheers,
Ian

  • Locked
Those not getting sharp images from the 5D III...

Looooong time lurker first time poster. Have always appreciated the wealth of knowledge on this forum! I notice a lot of people here seem to be having focusing issues with their 5D Mark III. This worried me into performing some tests of my own. After some MFA using the DPP method someone kindly posted (thanks!) I am now extremely happy with what this wonderful camera is able to produce - tact sharp images! At least, to my non-professional enthusiast eye (happy to hear to the contrary though!).

JPEG - http://min.us/mml2oKnk2
100% Crop - http://min.us/mqmIxGuGo
RAW - http://min.us/m170y1QgD

Enjoy your cameras, the 5D III is (to me) perfect!

  • Locked
BG-E11, anyone?

Has anyone gotten the BG-E11 yet? I ordered one on March 6th from B&H and it's still in backordered status. I called today and was told they did not know when it would be available. I'm so used to shooting with a vertical grip my 5d3 feels completely dinky without it - especially with big heavy glass mounted..

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
37,480
Messages
975,426
Members
24,816
Latest member
GLBDD

Gallery statistics

Categories
1
Albums
29
Uploaded media
372
Embedded media
1
Comments
25
Disk usage
1 GB