-
Locked
MegaPixel frenzy vs. Lens capability
- By KimH
- Canon Lenses
- 5 Replies
I read through the last couple of days of back and fro on 5D"?" and the lust for MP.
Someone mentioned that there are "less than a handfull" of current Canon lenses that can handle 64MP (someones wild shot), which makes me think and ask:
What is the optimal (or even a sensible) MP resolution on a FF to fit/match the good 70-200-II or the 4LIS, the 100 2.8L Macro.
To me it would appear that a 5DII has a sensor resolution max of 3800 LW/PH (Source PZ Klaus Schroiff) and these 2-3 great pieces of optics does not use the "space" allowed. Is it because they can't
The only one I have seen that might, is the 24mm 1.4-L-II (Centre only), I assume the 300 2.8LII and it's bigger sister would maybe...
Do i read this LW/PH all wrong, are there other limitation (MP or lens)?
Is there a sensible stream on this topic already or does anyone have a technical answer - just to give me some solace, while i wait for Friday :
Someone mentioned that there are "less than a handfull" of current Canon lenses that can handle 64MP (someones wild shot), which makes me think and ask:
What is the optimal (or even a sensible) MP resolution on a FF to fit/match the good 70-200-II or the 4LIS, the 100 2.8L Macro.
To me it would appear that a 5DII has a sensor resolution max of 3800 LW/PH (Source PZ Klaus Schroiff) and these 2-3 great pieces of optics does not use the "space" allowed. Is it because they can't
The only one I have seen that might, is the 24mm 1.4-L-II (Centre only), I assume the 300 2.8LII and it's bigger sister would maybe...
Do i read this LW/PH all wrong, are there other limitation (MP or lens)?
Is there a sensible stream on this topic already or does anyone have a technical answer - just to give me some solace, while i wait for Friday :