Your rant ignores the possibility that Canon is simply lying about the extent of the overheating problem to provide cover for once again needlessly crippling a camera body. It doesn't take an advanced engineering degree to look at data that suggests actual internal temperatures are completely uncorrelated to temperature warnings and shutdowns and conclude that the whole situation is simply the result of a software cripple dressed up as a design necessity. Even if you're fine with Canon's decision to intentionally cripple the R5, I don't know how you can defend lying about it.
++++It doesn't take an advanced engineering degree to look at data that suggests actual internal temperatures are completely uncorrelated to temperature warnings
A.M.: I read that sensor temps at around 60C could be potentially damaging for image quality both stills and video. Sensor reaching 60C temps has been confirmed by multiple sources (EXIF and measurements). It may also lead to mid to long term sensor functional issues. “Canon's decision to intentionally cripple the R5” is yet another conspiracy theory.
Upvote
0