Whenever Canon does something first it is called a weird niche product that no one needs.Looks like Canon isn't exactly that conservative, lagging behind camera maker, like you can read in masses of bashing comments on DPRev. Well, everybody who knows about Canon's history knows this already
Or gets criticized (DPR forum) for features it has or should have got. ("Nobody needs a 24-105 F/2,8, they should have made an F/4 or a 35-150" etc...) and so on and so on.
)
The integrated grip makes it too large!!!!!Or gets criticized (DPR forum) for features it has or should have got. ("Nobody needs a 24-105 F/2,8, they should have made an F/4 or a 35-150" etc...) and so on and so on.
I waiting for the R1 criticism (no global shutter, no reduced DR, no native 250 ISO
Sorry, I forgot. Criticism has already started here on this forum, before the R1's specs have become public !
The imminent launch of Apple Vision Pro and the amount of money Facebook spends on the metaverse likely play a role as well.
Yep - when Apple gets involved, you generally know its heading for the mass market and, in this case, there will be a surge in demand for content (and the tools to produce it).
I remain unconvinced about mass-market appeal for prolonged headset wearing, but I am interested in capturing more of the 3D nature of things. Especially for things like dragonfly close-ups, but I suspect it will not be suitable for macro purposes.
Do you know any kids between 10-14? The Oculus/Meta Quest comes off when the parental restriction kicks in or the battery runs out, and not before.
