It will probably be what the 7DII should have been
Upvote
0
Adrianf said:I feel that Canon's objective is simple. The Nikon D500 has a slight advantage in performance over the 7D2. Canon needs the 7D3 to be better, in every way, than the D500, but not by much. If they can't do that, then eventually the D500 replacement will blow Canon's crop cameras off the map. It should be a game of leap-frog - that's healthy competition, and drives development targets. The other thing is, too many megapixels and we'll all need the fanciest glassware to keep up.
RGF said:Given that the 7D3 will be introduced severals after the D500, the 7D3 needs to be clearly superior. Technology marches forward, Canon needs to raise the bar with the 7D3.
Well, it's not obvious. The 6DII is not better than 6D in general, because imaging sensor quality is the most important part, and that is worse than the previous version.ahsanford said:Will the 7D3 be better than the 7D2 in general? Obviously.
stilscream said:The 7d would be a prime lineup to start into mirrorless.
Slim the body ever so slightly and lighten the body without changing the battery.
Give us, please
-12-15fps
-24mp
- uhs2 SD and CF CARD
4K at 24/30fps and at least 120fps 1080 in respectable codecs.
-EF mount capable.
Fully articulating screen.
Catch up to Sony circa 2016
Work on a series of lighter weight lenses that don’t sacrifice IQ much
stilscream said:The 7d would be a prime lineup to start into mirrorless.
Slim the body ever so slightly and lighten the body without changing the battery.
Give us, please
-12-15fps
-24mp
- uhs2 SD and CF CARD
4K at 24/30fps and at least 120fps 1080 in respectable codecs.
-EF mount capable.
Fully articulating screen.
Catch up to Sony circa 2016
Work on a series of lighter weight lenses that don’t sacrifice IQ much