As long as you have legal authority to be on the land, you can take the pictures. 6-3-414 (a) (ii) (A) for public land and 6-3-414 (b) (ii) (A) for private land.
What these sections define is trespassing which is nothing new. This legislation addresses the collection of data (to include photography) while engaged in trespass.
This is to address a situation where a person may claim that their "right" to take a photograph supersedes trespass law.
What is of concern with this legislation is 6-3-414 (e) "No resource data [to include photography] collected in violation of this section is admissible in evidence in any civil, criminal or administrative proceeding, other than a prosecution for violation of this section or a civil action against the violator."
This means that if you trespass and take pictures that indicate an unlawful operation by, for example, the government, your picture can not be admissible as evidence. Think about that for a bit.
You can take photographs if you have legal authority to be on public or private land.... the real question is when can this legal authority be taken away?
If LE is responding to an incident, does LE have the authority to temporarily revoke a citizen's authority to legally be in a specific area? If so, and LE does revoke this authority, then the citizen would not only be trespassing but any photographs of, for example, police brutality, would be inadmissible in any court proceedings that would involve the police.
It will be interesting to see if this new legislation survives higher court review.