Jack Douglas said:
AlanF said:
Jack
I borrowed a 5DIII to compare results. The good news for you is that the 400mm DO II + 2xTC performs very well on it and resolves significantly more than with the 1.4xTC.
I would judge:
400mm DO II on 5DS R is sharper than 400mm DO II + 1.4xTC on 5DIII
400mm DO II + 1.4xTC 5DS R is similar to 400mm DO II + 2xTC on 5DIII
400mm DO II + 1.4xTC 5DS R is similar to 400mm DO II + 2xTC on 5DS R
I really regret selling my 5DIII, but it means I'll get a 5D IV when the time is right.
Alan, I'm so sorry you'll have to get a 5D4. My condolences.
Thanks for you assessments. Now you can do some bloodhound sniffing on why the 5D4 would be better for me than the 1DX II. Probably it'll depend on how 30 MP has affected IQ and how close AF is.
Jack
The last month I have been shooting 1DX2 and 5D3 back to back, there are many advantages of the 1DX2 that stack up well against the 5D3 for example, but I have to be honest and say I think pixel peeping wise the 5D3 seems to have the slight advantage, I do feel I can see the slightly higher MP count of the 5D! Now saying that do take into account that ALL of the many other factors can result in a much lower hit rate with the 5D3, such as AF, ISO noise, FPS and so on, I know you have talked many times about cropping and of late I have been shooting small song birds, a new-ish subject for me but cropping even with my 500/4Mk2+1.4@700mm is a big factor even when only say 8-15m from the birds! Its here I have found that pixel count does matter, I find I can take a perfectly good photograph but end up peeping and comparing the two bodies, ridiculous I know. Sadly my 1DX2 has now gone back as has excessive dust again in the PP housing, you cant clean it from there so I am now in a position to get my money back and decide what the hell I am going to do, thing is the 1DX2 is SUCH a weapon of a camera its hard to not have it in the bag, the AF and FPS just blows any other camera away...BUT then there is the matter of 20MP.