- Jun 22, 2021
- 267
- 287
I like #3. Like the Sigma. Minimal size weight and cost full frame.
But #2 is fun.
Upvote
0
A new EOS R system camera is coming in January [CR2]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
But #2 is fun.
My guess....a rebodied R5 that looks like an old Canonet. I'm...come on, that's what the RF mount means? Range Finder?
Upvote
0
- Jun 22, 2021
- 267
- 287
This is the most forward thinking option. Instead of a $2000 body you keep for three years and sell for $1000, (or 3x if you prefer pro), why not a $40/month ($120/month pro) body on a lease contract, with generous options to send back to upgrade to something newer and better?
That odd patent application model with the odd grip pass-though is another possibility.
I was looking at the AE-1 days ago as I admired the Nikon retro versions. I think that would be ideal, and maybe brand it AE-1 with "Digital" where it said "Program". And style an EF adapter to make it look right with vintage lenses. Definitely produce a vintage style RF lens, maybve based on the RF 50 1.8, and a kit zoom.
Upvote
0
APSC RF would annoy me as someone who has been getting into photography with the M line and would like an update to the M6 MK2 with EFCS and better 4k video that doesn't require I throw out and replace the lenses I already forked out on.
But I gather M users are in the minority so we're probably not who is going to be annoyed.
Maybe it will be a new RF-M mount camera which can work with EF-M lenses. That'd annoy the fanboys wanting Canon to ditch having separate mounts.
But I gather M users are in the minority so we're probably not who is going to be annoyed.
Maybe it will be a new RF-M mount camera which can work with EF-M lenses. That'd annoy the fanboys wanting Canon to ditch having separate mounts.
Upvote
0
I would have bought it over my 2 slot R6, I never entered into that ricockulous argument, I was out shooting with what I had at the time.
Upvote
0
I'd buy a Canon Monochrom in a heartbeat.Be great for astro if it has no AA filter & an infrared cutoff filter
Upvote
0
Nothing controversial about this though as it's a cinema camera and people like me who mostly shoot stills have nothing to complain about other than Canon doesn't make a more stills dedicated version as well
Upvote
0
Well the M6 mark ii is only 2 years old so how soon do you expect Canon to update it ? M users are hardly a minority as it's a very big selling line up.
My 7D mark ii is 7 years old and no sign of an update yet.
I had hoped for an aps-c R7 but it seems doubtful now and I've pretty much given up on it.
Can't see how EF-M lenses could be adapted to the R mount unless they made an R camera with a sensor that moves forward and backward 2mm and also has a way of adapting the different mounts which seems extremely unlikely.
Perhaps Canon will make 3 different aps-c cameras for the R mount:
- An R7 with a substantial body based on the R6 and priced about the same or a bit lower than the R6
- An R-s body that's super compact with similar internals to the R6 and priced as above.
- An R2 with a body based on the R3 and priced similar to the R5. (Very unlikely but what a dream camera !)
The ''Full Frame is the only acceptable Canon format" crowd will whine like crazy if any of these cameras are released
Upvote
0
There are people convinced that the R5 never overheats and it is just a trick by Canon to sell more expensive cameras.
Upvote
0
A 4MB camera that shoots at 240fps. Because "Canon knows". The new R1 will be 4MP so sports photographers and PJ'S can get those shots in quick.
Upvote
0
Going by what I've read on these forums, the things people seem to not like the most are 20MP sensors, the idea of a APS-C RF and a camera focused on video. I think it could be a 24MP APS-C RF, or a 20MP entry-level Full frame RF. Or perhaps it will have the tilt screen like the M5.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
