Happy to see an M6 Mark II and M5 Mark II on this list
. I know the M line has been in question after the EOS R's announcement, so this is a sign of relief at least for now. Seeing as the M100 is only about a year old, we probably won't be seeing an M200 on a certification list until sometime in the second half of next year.
I expect Canon to grow the M series of bodies (and lenses, although not as much...) for many many years.
The Canon future is M for small-and-light APS-C shooters...and R for those who simply must have full frame (professionals and those who want to shoot like professionals!).
I am interested to see the G9X III on the list.
I still own a fully-functional S95; this tiny little body served us very very well.
I looked...and looked...and studied some more, when the G9X I (and II) came on the market.
I decided against purchasing both...with the tiny M2 + 22mm lens often in my hands, I find myself using the S95 less and less...
But here's the key, too.
For people/vacation-type pictures that do not require a flash, it turns out that the camera on the Apple 6s is...tremendous!
So there's another comparison for me to make, when deciding on the G9X III...vs the iPhone as well as a tiny M. For me, I'll be looking at how 'quick' and 'responsive' the G9X III seems...I was not impressed with the II's responsiveness, and I wasn't all that satisfied with what I saw from the 1" sensor inside of it, either. But I'm hopeful that the III will surprise me, in a good way.