mackguyver said:I had a very tame osprey this morning - I was able to get within about 30 feet in my mobile blind - aka car:
mackguyver said:Here's a few more from this morning:
![]()
![]()
![]()
LJ3Jim said:New member, first post. I love the 300 II with the 1.4 or 2x extenders. Here are a couple of eagles taken with the 2x iii.
![]()
![]()
Regards, Jim
krisbell said:Here are a few of my recent efforts - all shot with 300 II, 2x III and 5D3....
Little Ringed Plover (Charadrius dubius) chick by Kristian Bell, on Flickr
Bee-Eaters by Kristian Bell, on Flickr
Perez Frog by Kristian Bell, on Flickr
Forest lizard (Calotes emma) by Kristian Bell, on Flickr
Hunting Long-Eared Owl by Kristian Bell, on Flickr
Napalm said:Dear friends
I'm from Spain and this is my first topic (so, excuse my English).
I'm looking for a lens for surfing photography and I don't know if the EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM in combination with a 2x or 1,4x III will be enough.
Also I'm looking the EF 500 F4 IS USM (used).
My usual body is the Eos 5DsR but maybe with a 7D MarkII is a good option with crop factor.
It's not easy to decide. It's a lot of money and I don't know what to do
Thank you everybody for your help!![]()
takesome1 said:Napalm said:Dear friends
I'm from Spain and this is my first topic (so, excuse my English).
I'm looking for a lens for surfing photography and I don't know if the EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM in combination with a 2x or 1,4x III will be enough.
Also I'm looking the EF 500 F4 IS USM (used).
My usual body is the Eos 5DsR but maybe with a 7D MarkII is a good option with crop factor.
It's not easy to decide. It's a lot of money and I don't know what to do
Thank you everybody for your help!![]()
The 5Ds R IQ cropped is about equal to the 7D Mark II, I have been hard pressed to see any difference and I own both. That said the word "crop factor" is meaningless in this comparison. Just use the 5Ds R in crop mode if that is the framing you want. The reason to go with the 7D Mark II in your situation is frame rate, and that might be a very good reason.
I owned the 500mm F/4 and recently upgrade to version II. The improvement in image quality was marginal. The biggest difference is weight and image stabilization. I would imagine that IS wouldn't matter to you and you would most likely be shooting at higher shutter speeds or on a tripod.
Personally between the 300mm f/2.8K II with a 1.4x II or the 500mm F/4 IS II would take which ever gives you the proper framing without the extender. Here in the US I can buy the 500mm used today for $4K us, the 300mm new is $6K and used 5K. So it is a cheaper option as well.