It is a cesspool of people shouting at each other and not learning anything!Avoid dpreview... they have irrational hero worship there.
Upvote
0
It is a cesspool of people shouting at each other and not learning anything!Avoid dpreview... they have irrational hero worship there.
2022 CIPA shows that China is at 30%, Asia (minus Japan) at 23%, Europe at 41%, Americas at 41%, Japan 18% and rest of world at 17%."This year, we expect the global market for interchangeable lens cameras to be around 5.5 to 6 million units and more than 70 of this to be mirrorless cameras."
So they're predicting 30% of ILC sales this year to be DSLRs. That's a big drop, but still higher than I would expect. I find it surprising that people are still buying DSLRs in that sort of quantity, given that Canon is pushing the RF system so heavily.
May be related to aging population. Older buyers with a system may prefer the optical view finder than electronic ones. On FM I know one member there that disposed of all his system before he stopped being active on the forum. Would not be surprised there was another one from TH that did the same.What is surprising to me is that developing countries have average or lower DLSR purchases.
Asia/China (including India etc) tend to have less disposable income or small business revenue eg weddings etc but that mirrorless is a lower % compared to Europe which mostly consists of developed countries. Seems counterintuitive to me.
The graphic shows them continuing to expand the RF lens lineup at the same rate, so we will probably see around seven new RF lenses this year.
I remember watching a year 2021 review of the 2015 5Ds R. The studio-owner reviewer said they preferred keeping what they have and adding more units because it was cheap, it did not change their workflow and none of their clients were asking any changes.I absolutely understand why some people still favour the optical viewfinders of DSLRs, but I don't really get the logic of staying with DSLRs on the basis of having a few CF cards. Recent DSLRs such as my 5DMkiv had CF and SD - and the latter are crazy-cheap.
I think the percentage of people who already have a DSLR, and choose to get another DSLR as an upgrade is pretty low. Upgraders want better specifications all round, and that means getting a MILC - and Canon have made that transition very easy due to the ability to use EF lenses on RF cameras, without loss of AF performance.
The vast majority of DSLR purchasers these days are probably novices looking for an affordable way into photography, and such folk are typically heavily influenced by advertising and influencers, who are almost exclusively promoting MILCS. So it surprises me that peer pressure from MILC users, and heavy promotion of MILCs by Canon, Nikon and Sony, hasn't led to a more rapid and severe collapse in demand for DSLRs.
If Canon does come with the 35 1.2 they better keep the price in check, no more than 2k. Aside from the 1/3 stop increase in aperture over the 35mm 1.4ii there is little they could to to improve on it that would make an upgrade worth much added cost. Unlike 50 or 85mm, bokeh difference is too slight to matter.Here's to hoping for a 35mm f/1.2L this year
Interesting thoughts but the idea of ‘of course, all cameras will be hybrid’ i think is wrong. There is definitely a need for the cine that has no photo capabilities. They have to compute the red, Arri and Sony. R5c and c70 is a great start but a refresh of the c line is needed.Not directly relayed to your post, but on the subject of video, I'd like to think that when the R5ii and/or R5s are launched, that they would be more stills-orientated, now that the R5C, as well as the Cine line, exists for video specialists.
For example - video users like to use either a flippy screen, or to mount an external monitor on a rig. Stills users on the other hand tend to prefer a tilting screen, or a Panasonic-style screen that remains on-axis with the lens, but can also be flipped out or reversed when desired.
Of course, all cameras now will be hybrids, so it's impossible to have a pure video or pure stills camera any more, but I do believe that with the exception of events and media professionals, most folk fall into either the stills camp or the video camp, with little overlap.
Perhaps more accurately is that "all cameras are already hybrid". Live view for DLSRs was already video from the sensor so recording from there was "simple".Interesting thoughts but the idea of ‘of course, all cameras will be hybrid’ i think is wrong. There is definitely a need for the cine that has no photo capabilities. They have to compute the red, Arri and Sony. R5c and c70 is a great start but a refresh of the c line is needed.
No chance (unfortunately) the 1,2/35 costs less than $2000.If Canon does come with the 35 1.2 they better keep the price in check, no more than 2k. Aside from the 1/3 stop increase in aperture over the 35mm 1.4ii there is little they could to to improve on it that would make an upgrade worth much added cost. Unlike 50 or 85mm, bokeh difference is too slight to matter.
I do not think the default is really selected by "Best Seller".This
Again it could be both. If I were to check Adorama it may behave similarly.
When you arrive on product category it will show what they want to feature. Then when you reselect the default "Best Seller" then it shows the Rebels.
Seeming Amazon shows the top sellers are Rebels with lens kits at a price point below the cheapest RF body without lens kit then odds are price is driving demand for these DSLRs.
Very few with a CR username would be buying these Rebels for personal use. We do not represent the digital camera market.
Well, technically every Cinema EOS and Canon Camcorder currently made can take still photos.Interesting thoughts but the idea of ‘of course, all cameras will be hybrid’ i think is wrong. There is definitely a need for the cine that has no photo capabilities. They have to compute the red, Arri and Sony. R5c and c70 is a great start but a refresh of the c line is needed.
I have the 2 RF 1.2's and I had their EF predecessors. I wouldn't say the bokeh is particularly better, but the new lenses are sharper, faster and nearer focusing and those traits made the upgrade worthy to me. I know that the EF 35mm f/1.4 II is a much more modern lens than the EF 50mm and 85mm f/1.2, but I wouldn't be surprised if the differences are more than the bare 1/3 stop.If Canon does come with the 35 1.2 they better keep the price in check, no more than 2k. Aside from the 1/3 stop increase in aperture over the 35mm 1.4ii there is little they could to to improve on it that would make an upgrade worth much added cost. Unlike 50 or 85mm, bokeh difference is too slight to matter.
My guess is that the average purchaser of new cameras in Europe and North America is middle-aged, and more likely to buy traditional gear, i.e. DSLRs, hence the 41%.2022 CIPA shows that China is at 30%, Asia (minus Japan) at 23%, Europe at 41%, Americas at 41%, Japan 18% and rest of world at 17%.
Given the migration to mirrorless, there would be some expectation that the DLSR numbers would decrease though.
What is surprising to me is that developing countries have average or lower DLSR purchases.
Asia/China (including India etc) tend to have less disposable income or small business revenue eg weddings etc but that mirrorless is a lower % compared to Europe which mostly consists of developed countries. Seems counterintuitive to me.
The 90D is a fine camera. For butterflies and birds you don't really need the AF features and fast fps of MILCs, unless you're shooting BIF.I got my 90D a few years ago as an upgrade from the 700D, at the time there was no crop R bodies. I choose the 90D over the RP because I like APS-C for butterflies and birds and I also wanted the most likely last xxD DSLR released. But if the R10/R7 were available at the time I probably would have got one of those with the EF adapter. At this stage I don't have any plans to upgrade to RF because the gear I have does everything I need it to.
Since it's not me they are worshiping, I agree.Avoid dpreview... they have irrational hero worship there.
It's raining.My gosh people actually argue and discuss this? Who really cares
I have to say I have never tried taking a photo on a the C500. if it is possible it is hing away somewhere. Also can you imagine Turing up for a photoshoot with a C500 in your hand hahahaha. Or if you are doing a studio shoot with strobes and you have no way of triggering them. Im not entirely are ALL canons cameras are hybrid.Well, technically every Cinema EOS and Canon Camcorder currently made can take still photos.