Canon MP-E 65 1x-5x 2.8 Macro Lens example photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goincarcrazy
  • Start date Start date
A good thing in the cold end of autumn are the solitary wasps paralysed by the cold, much friendlier for photos and not organised in dangerous groups. This one was on the wall of my home and I invited for some photos. The background are mature lemons.

this photo is with Canon MP-E @ 2.5x and f/9

 
Upvote 0
Those are amazing - Just fantastic! I have not ventured into the Macro world much but those pictures get me thinking what I could do. Probably take a long time before I can even come close to some of those as they are truly works of art. Sinister looking creatures when you can see them in such detail.
 
Upvote 0
Heidrun said:
I get the same problem. They fly away as soon as I come near. Only need to be around half a meter before they get away

Getting them to pose for a photo is a trick that I've not mastered. Early in the morning when its still pretty cool, I sometimes come accross a insect that spent the night on a flower, and I can get close.

Some photographers have some tricks they use, follow a macro forum.
 
Upvote 0
Here are a couple of recent shots with this lens:


EOS 5D Mark II, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro @ 5x, 1/60 s, f/11, ISO 400, MT-24EX


EOS 5D Mark II, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro @ 4x, 1/60 s, f/11, ISO 400, MT-24EX
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Goincarcrazy said:
The precision matte focusing screens, although dark with this lens, REALLY help with focusing.

It was my understanding that the benefit of the precision matte focusing screen is really for lenses faster than f/2.8, since the laser etching on the standard screen which is intended to brighten slow (e.g. consumer) lenses limits faster lenses to VF brightness equivalent to about f/2.5. I've certainly confirmed that with my 85L and a standard screen, where stopping down from f/1.2 onwards with DoF preview, the VF does not get any dimmer until I hit ~f/2.5 (although on my 7D, it's clear that the light is getting in since the transmissive LCD in the VF is much more 'washed out' at f/1.2 than f/2.5, even though the scene brightness is unchanged).

Since the 'brightness' of the VF changes in tandem with the DoF seen through the VF, the standard focusing screen is showing you a DoF equivalent to ~f/2.5, even with a wider aperture lens. Thus, precision focusing screens are better for fast lenses because they are showing you the true DoF at apertures faster than f/2.8.

However, I was not aware that there was a significant benefit to the precision matte focusing screens with for manual focusing with f/2.8 (like the MP-E 65mm) and slower lenses. I could see the benefit of a split screen and microprism, but not sure about the benefit from the plain matte screen. Can you elaborate?

I always found the ratings the DSLR screens to be rather optimistic in terms of what speed lens you can manually focus well with. The stock screens, IMO, make it tricky to really nail things with not just stuff that is f/1.4 or f/2 but also f/2.8 and even for f/4 I find they help tremendously (even if things get darker). The stock DSLR screens are so poor for focusing, I almost feel like you don't want to trust them unless you are like f/5.6! They make things across the frame look waymore in focus than the actual photos.
 
Upvote 0
Tice Lerner said:
Hello! Here are a few from me. :)


Jumping Spider leaping at my lens - single shot taken at 3x magnification, f13, 1/250th sec ISO100
1026977449_FSikP-XL-1.jpg

How in the world did you time that? They jump at fantastic speeds and DOF at 3x, even at f/13, is almost zero!
 
Upvote 0
LetTheRightLensIn said:
I always found the ratings the DSLR screens to be rather optimistic in terms of what speed lens you can manually focus well with. The stock screens, IMO, make it tricky to really nail things with not just stuff that is f/1.4 or f/2 but also f/2.8 and even for f/4 I find they help tremendously (even if things get darker). The stock DSLR screens are so poor for focusing, I almost feel like you don't want to trust them unless you are like f/5.6! They make things across the frame look waymore in focus than the actual photos.

Thanks for the feedback! Usually with the MP-E 65mm, I'm shooting in Live View, which obviates the focusing screen. But sometimes I use the VF, and I have the Eg-S screen for my 5DII - so, I'll have to give it a try for macro with my f/2.8 lenses (MP-E 65mm and 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS), and maybe with something like the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, although AF usually does fine with that lens.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Here are a couple of recent shots with this lens:


EOS 5D Mark II, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro @ 5x, 1/60 s, f/11, ISO 400, MT-24EX


EOS 5D Mark II, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro @ 4x, 1/60 s, f/11, ISO 400, MT-24EX

Excellent work neuro!

For me MP-E 65 is the reason alone to stick with Canon, and I don't even consider myself macro photographer, more like curious photographer or something.
Would like to see people really pushing the envelope with this lens, not just a shots like with let's say 100mm macro with an extension tube.
 

Attachments

  • DRAGON-FLY-EYES.jpg
    DRAGON-FLY-EYES.jpg
    620.7 KB · Views: 6,774
  • HIBISKUS-POLLEN-POD.jpg
    HIBISKUS-POLLEN-POD.jpg
    362.2 KB · Views: 5,537
Upvote 0