I don’t think you see the concern
If the concerns are true then this is a disappointment for video users
imagine if the burst rate on your camera was limited by temperature. You would miss shots or change what you really wanted to do based on how warm your camera.
Hoping it’s not true
If the concerns are true then this is a disappointment for video users
imagine if the burst rate on your camera was limited by temperature. You would miss shots or change what you really wanted to do based on how warm your camera.
Hoping it’s not true
The substance is in the article there for all to see:
Both the R5 and R6 have active thermal protection that can and will be triggered when the measured limits are reached.
I find this line critical from the article posted.
"Before recording starts, the EOS R5 and EOS R6 display an estimate of the recordable time based on the current camera temperature and the set recording mode."
If this is true, the user will know before they hit the record button what they can and cannot do in terms of record length at the selected mode. So if the user wants 15mins of 4K120 (roughly 75mins of slow motion on a 4K 24P timeline) and the Camera is showing that you have 5mins of record time you have to change the shot or wait till the Camera is ready for that workload.
I think it is still fuss, because the limitations are clearly stated. If the record limits in the higher resolutions do not meet some users needs they need to look elsewhere.
Upvote
0