Canon's roadmap

What do you guys think are canon's most disappointing achievements this year? Choose 3, evaluate, an

  • an overpriced ff 6d package

    Votes: 25 37.3%
  • tons of expensive is primes

    Votes: 25 37.3%
  • a 24-70f4 is costing about $1,500

    Votes: 24 35.8%
  • the pro l L primes are loosing to new zooms(24-70's), and the new Sigma lenses are coming out on top

    Votes: 10 14.9%
  • a very nice 1dx, but the extermination of a pro crop censor for wild life shooters.

    Votes: 4 6.0%
  • 2new rebels in 1 year with a third on the way

    Votes: 5 7.5%
  • a curious mirror less eos m, with a second camera on the way, and only 2 lenses

    Votes: 11 16.4%
  • The combination of the 60d and the 7d, to make a combo, giving ameutures and pro's the same camera,

    Votes: 5 7.5%
  • The apparent idea of combining all the aps-c cameras, where all pros would have to move to ff, and s

    Votes: 8 11.9%
  • The 3d/4d talk, but no results

    Votes: 9 13.4%
  • No word and long postponement of the 14-24 l and 200-400

    Votes: 23 34.3%
  • Canon is leaving the amateurs in the dark with no 7d ii or 70d, and no new ef-s lenses

    Votes: 18 26.9%

  • Total voters
    67
Status
Not open for further replies.
verysimplejason said:
I can see more than half of those pictures taken by 5D mark II.

Not half, more like a quarter. A link to a metadata analysis of those image was posted in this thread.

I wonder... All those people posting that Canon is behind, that they have to catch up, whatever...what do they think about Canon being behind when a collection of Reuters' 'best images' of the year was shot with the camera distribution in that collection? I realize that there are many categories of photographer besides photojournalists, but eyeballing the pie chart, Nikon has 9-10%, Sony 1%, and Canon around 90% of the images in the collection. When seeing a piece of data like that, it helps put some of Canon's design choices (e.g. the 1D X) into perspective.
 

Attachments

  • Cameras for Reuters Best of 2012.png
    Cameras for Reuters Best of 2012.png
    46 KB · Views: 1,187
Upvote 0
Hmm, that chart is mighty interesting!

In general (and I've said it before in nauseating detail), Canon seems to be taking a 'damn the torpedoes, full price ahead' attitude with insane pricing for products that are delayed to increase desire. I think they are taking the Apple approach. Let anticipation build, keep quite and let the press and the bloggers work everyone into a fever pitch, then pull the trigger on the release but release slowly to encourage more pre-orders in the future and immediate snapping up of scarce stock.

Canon seems to be treating their product releases like having their hand on a revenue steam throttle. If they open it up full bore, people will get saturated with product and not buy as quickly but it they release products slow and let the pressure build up, they produce more power revenue.

Just a thought...
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
verysimplejason said:
I can see more than half of those pictures taken by 5D mark II.

Not half, more like a quarter. A link to a metadata analysis of those image was posted in this thread.

I wonder... All those people posting that Canon is behind, that they have to catch up, whatever...what do they think about Canon being behind when a collection of Reuters' 'best images' of the year was shot with the camera distribution in that collection? I realize that there are many categories of photographer besides photojournalists, but eyeballing the pie chart, Nikon has 9-10%, Sony 1%, and Canon around 90% of the images in the collection. When seeing a piece of data like that, it helps put some of Canon's design choices (e.g. the 1D X) into perspective.

Reuters supposedly has a contract with Canon to use their products. ???
 
Upvote 0
RustyTheGeek said:
Hmm, that chart is mighty interesting!

In general (and I've said it before in nauseating detail), Canon seems to be taking a 'damn the torpedoes, full price ahead' attitude with insane pricing for products that are delayed to increase desire. I think they are taking the Apple approach. Let anticipation build, keep quite and let the press and the bloggers work everyone into a fever pitch, then pull the trigger on the release but release slowly to encourage more pre-orders in the future and immediate snapping up of scarce stock.

Canon seems to be treating their product releases like having their hand on a revenue steam throttle. If they open it up full bore, people will get saturated with product and not buy as quickly but it they release products slow and let the pressure build up, they produce more power revenue.

Just a thought...

That's why you need to keep your hands tied for a while. Control that itching. Prices normalize after 3-6 months. :)
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
verysimplejason said:
I can see more than half of those pictures taken by 5D mark II.

Not half, more like a quarter. A link to a metadata analysis of those image was posted in this thread.

I wonder... All those people posting that Canon is behind, that they have to catch up, whatever...what do they think about Canon being behind when a collection of Reuters' 'best images' of the year was shot with the camera distribution in that collection? I realize that there are many categories of photographer besides photojournalists, but eyeballing the pie chart, Nikon has 9-10%, Sony 1%, and Canon around 90% of the images in the collection. When seeing a piece of data like that, it helps put some of Canon's design choices (e.g. the 1D X) into perspective.

Sorry, I'm wrong but I think it's more than a third. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.