I'm sure there will be. In the meantime, there's a 3.The wrong numbers are being added. There needs to be a 1.
Clearly the M series will be discontinued at some point between now and when the sun becomes a red giant. I think closer to the former than the latter is a safe bet.Hard times for the "M is not dead" fraction!
Did everyone miss the huge announcement/rumour here, the replacement for EF-S lenses is here! It looks like RF-S lenses 'are/will be a thing'...
The Canon RF-S 18-45mm f/3.5-5.6 and RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 sound like typical kit lens zooms.
The questionable RF 16mm f/2.8 will make a decent 24mm f/4.5 equivalent on APSC, and the periphery won't matter because it will be all cropped away!
If the RF-S bodies can run EF-S lenses with an adapter, that provides even more options!
Fear cripples me and I am unable to put it in the cart, if I buy one the next day they will release a 1.I'm sure there will be. In the meantime, there's a 3.
I think the big question is will it be high MP and slower, or lower MP and faster? The R1 likely will be substantially more expensive. I have been quite happy with the R3, compared to my 1D X.Fear cripples me and I am unable to put it in the cart, if I buy one the next day they will release a 1.
In reality I will be waiting another year or two.
Could as easy go ) R11, 12, 13. If they plan to run with it long term. Then R100, R101, R102, R1000, R1001. R1002.R10! Interesting..
I’m guessing then in the future we’ll have the R20, R30, R40.. As such with the 70D, 80D and 90D. The R7 is obviously the 7D line replacement we’ve all been waiting for!
Time to save££££££!
That would be a smart move. I mean, look at all the work Canon had to do—new mount, new bodies, new lenses—when they needed a successor to the 90D. ;-)Could as easy go ) R11, 12, 13. If they plan to run with it long term. Then R100, R101, R102, R1000, R1001. R1002.
Could do! That’s like 2000 years of the RF system though! HahaCould as easy go ) R11, 12, 13. If they plan to run with it long term. Then R100, R101, R102, R1000, R1001. R1002.
I have an RP for this. It cost $400 net as a Canon refurb after selling the f4 L zoom in the refurb kit. It's my placeholder until the tiny finderless Sigma equivalent. Would like a 35-40mm f2 instead of the RF50f1.8, but that works fine for now for the kitchen counter family camera.R10 is a nice surprise! If the price and size is right I could totally see myself picking up a small and "cheap" R10 for travel when I don't need the R5. The RF 16mm and 50mm would be perfect for a little camera. Maybe even pick up a 18-150 if the size is right.
The existing RF16mm would do just that, and I suspect they planned it that way.I wouldn’t mind an R10 with a pancake 24mm as a walk around kit but most likely will end up with an RP II and a 35mm F/1.8.
You'll know for sure if they also announce a RF to EF-M mounting adapter. But, I do agree with you.Hard times for the "M is not dead" fraction!
Such an adapter would be extremely difficult to build for physical/mechanical reasons alone. Also, consumers who buy M cameras don’t think in terms of upgrading and compatibility. That’s just for enthusiast geeks like us. Finally, EF-M lenses are very inexpensive, compared with the high end RF glass that many enthusiasts go for. All those factors considered, I highly doubt Canon will ever produce an EF-M to RF adapter.You'll know for sure if they also announce a RF to EF-M mounting adapter. But, I do agree with you.