Images & Specifications of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Leak Out

powershot2012

EOS RP
Aug 3, 2012
236
5
Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :eek: :D ::)


rrcphoto said:
pokerz said:
jeffa4444 said:
Seriously all you people troubled by the omission of 4K go buy a video camera. On a tiny sensor like this what kind of a 4K image do you think your going to get?
Gone it seems are the days we buy P&S cameras to take PHOTOGRAPHS no we want to be Hollywood directors instead and if we don't get 4K then hey ho were sulk.

Many Hollywood films are shot on Arri Alexa camera NOT ONE is 4K so they must be inferior!
Can Arri Alexa camera put into your pocket?
Rx 100 & LX10 do great 4k movie, it kicks 5dm3 1080 CRAPPY movie away.
actually the RX100 cannot do 4K movie "great"

they even call it 4k "clips" because it's limited to 5 minutes or less.

and the RX100 IV and above are considerably larger than the G9X, and the LX10 even more so.

there's the argument to be made that the G7x and upcoming G3x should have 4k clips of some sort.

however it's dramatically idiotic to think the G9x should considering it's diminutive size.

the three formentioned cameras:


in other words.. Good grief.
 

pokerz

EOS 90D
Aug 19, 2016
167
0
To be fair with Canon, let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS
bounce flash vs touch screen

Innovative Canon 8)
 

rrcphoto

EOS R6
Jun 20, 2013
2,505
147
powershot2012 said:
Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :eek: :D ::)
reading is hard I see. ::) ::)
 

rrcphoto

EOS R6
Jun 20, 2013
2,505
147
pokerz said:
To be fair with Canon, let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS
bounce flash vs touch screen

Innovative Canon 8)
Okay.. the only thing the RX100 has going for it is 1/3 EV at 28mm 28-100 and 1.8 FPS more. I heard lots of complaints about RX100's IS? no?

let's see on the G9X Mark II.

added a touchscreen, wifi/nfc and BLE, UHS-I support, ND filters,etc.

oh and is:

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 20% (7.5 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 26% (72 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II [281 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Yeah .. damn that canon for doing something well.

::) ::)
 

pokerz

EOS 90D
Aug 19, 2016
167
0
rrcphoto said:
pokerz said:
To be fair with Canon, let's compare RX 100 (2012) vs G9x2 (2017)
28-100mm vs 28-84mm
F1.8 - 4.9 vs F2.0-4.9
10FPS vs 8FPS
bounce flash vs touch screen

Innovative Canon 8)


Okay.. the only thing the RX100 has going for it is 1/3 EV at 28mm 28-100 and 1.8 FPS more. I heard lots of complaints about RX100's IS? no?

let's see on the G9X Mark II.

added a touchscreen, wifi/nfc and BLE, UHS-I support, ND filters,etc.

oh and is:

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 20% (7.5 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 26% (72 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 II [281 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Yeah .. damn that canon for doing something well.

::) ::)
ok, you are comparing Rx 100 (2013) vs G9x2 (2017)
Flipping screen and hotshoe vs touch screen, that's all.
 

rrcphoto

EOS R6
Jun 20, 2013
2,505
147
you're right, camerasize doesn't have the RX100

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 13% (4.9 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 13% (31 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 [240 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Happier? the point still stood.

Against the RX100 II? the RX100 II only had 3.9fps, but had a non touchscreen tilt screen and a hotshoe.

yeah .. that's real innovation there .. right?
 

pokerz

EOS 90D
Aug 19, 2016
167
0
rrcphoto said:
you're right, camerasize doesn't have the RX100

Canon PowerShot G9 X is 4% (3.6 mm) narrower and 0% (0.2 mm) shorter than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X is 13% (4.9 mm) thinner than Sony Cyber-shot RX100.
Canon PowerShot G9 X [209 g] weights 13% (31 grams) less than Sony Cyber-shot RX100 [240 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card).

Happier? the point still stood.

Against the RX100 II? the RX100 II only had 3.9fps, but had a non touchscreen tilt screen and a hotshoe.

yeah .. that's real innovation there .. right?
RX100 123 does 10FPS, RX100 4 does 14FPS and Rx 100 5 does 16FPS

I bet u never use any Rx100 and start discussing lol
 

powershot2012

EOS RP
Aug 3, 2012
236
5
Thinking, for others. ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story. ;D

rrcphoto said:
powershot2012 said:
Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :eek: :D ::)
reading is hard I see. ::) ::)
 

neuroanatomist

I post too Much on Here!!
CR Pro
Jul 21, 2010
24,649
2,181
powershot2012 said:
Thinking, for others. ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story. ;D

rrcphoto said:
powershot2012 said:
Seriously, you are even trying to put the G9X in the same league as the LX10, let alone the RX100 IV and V???

Now that is funny. :eek: :D ::)
reading is hard I see. ::) ::)
The RX100 is ~5 mm thicker and a few decagrams heavier.

It's ok if you don't understand physics, not everyone does.
 

rrcphoto

EOS R6
Jun 20, 2013
2,505
147
powershot2012 said:
Thinking, for others. ;)

Only thing worse than the G9X is the G9X II.

28-84mm F2.0-4.9 End of story. ;D
the funny thing is .. that once you get to 28mm the RX100's are at or over f2.0

the main comment was that you have compromises when you are attempting to make something smaller than optimal and maintain around a $500 price point at release.

hard concept I guess for some to gather.
 
Mar 13, 2018
2
0
Would like to see a g9x mark III with a sharper lens (edge,corner sharpness). Maybe even with a 1.8-4.9 aperture lens but only as long as they could still make it weight less and be smaller than original rx100.