unfocused said:LetTheRightLensIn said:And the reason I started going negative way back was so that we'd never end up in this position years later where Canon ended up totally blowing their dominance
That's magical thinking, along the lines of "I ate a pepperoni pizza before the Super Bowl and my team lost, so I will never eat a pepperoni pizza before a Super Bowl game again."
You can tell yourself that, but really, Canon isn't making their development decisions based on whether or not you make negative comments on a geek forum.
Meatcurry said:Battery grip and SD Wifi adapter images
http://www.*********.com/images-canon-w-e1-wifi-adapter-bg-e20-battery-grip-leaked-cw5/
weixing said:Hi,
Shutter 15 millions times??makistza said:- the durability of the shutter 15 million timesOr is it 0.15 millions times?? :
Have a nice day.
Antono Refa said:As to image micro-adjustment, bokeh shift, and ghost reduction - I have my doubts. If it was impressive, Canon would be drum those features before release, rather than after.
neuroanatomist said:scyrene said:But to dismiss normalisation as some dark art or weird fad is... absurd.
True – normalization is certainly useful and important in some cases. But it's important to understand what your doing, and why, or you risk looking like an idiot.
Antono Refa said:I wonder why Canon chose UHS-I over UHS-II.
As to image micro-adjustment, bokeh shift, and ghost reduction - I have my doubts. If it was impressive, Canon would be drum those features before release, rather than after.
Maiaibing said:Antono Refa said:I wonder why Canon chose UHS-I over UHS-II.
As to image micro-adjustment, bokeh shift, and ghost reduction - I have my doubts. If it was impressive, Canon would be drum those features before release, rather than after.
But... but... Canon's doing exactly that? Presenting the camera
neuroanatomist said:Yes, but it's a game. In fact, I totally disagree with LetTheRightLensIn that you should compare scaled values. Although those normalized 'Print' values are useful for engineers (and fangoils and measurebaters, too), it's the non-normalized 'Screen' values that should matter to photographers. For photographers, what matters is the difference between the brightest highlight detail and the darkest shadow detail that can be captured.
neuroanatomist said:True – normalization is certainly useful and important in some cases. But it's important to understand what your doing, and why, or you risk looking like an idiot.
unfocused said:LetTheRightLensIn said:And the reason I started going negative way back was so that we'd never end up in this position years later where Canon ended up totally blowing their dominance
That's magical thinking, along the lines of "I ate a pepperoni pizza before the Super Bowl and my team lost, so I will never eat a pepperoni pizza before a Super Bowl game again."
You can tell yourself that, but really, Canon isn't making their development decisions based on whether or not you make negative comments on a geek forum.