9VIII said:Judging by the consistency of the writing style I’m betting “Snoke” doesn’t speak/write English at all and posts through a translator.
He's trolling pretty consistently too
Upvote
0
9VIII said:Judging by the consistency of the writing style I’m betting “Snoke” doesn’t speak/write English at all and posts through a translator.
Jopa said:9VIII said:Judging by the consistency of the writing style I’m betting “Snoke” doesn’t speak/write English at all and posts through a translator.
He's trolling pretty consistently too
Quirkz said:Jopa said:9VIII said:Judging by the consistency of the writing style I’m betting “Snoke” doesn’t speak/write English at all and posts through a translator.
He's trolling pretty consistently too
I sometimes wonder if he doesn't mean to, but the translation makes it sound like he is.
OSOK said:Canon painted themselves into a corner. How can the 5DSR Mark II possibly be improved to compete with the Sony and Nikon offerings without murdering the 5D4 in the process?
Talys said:@Jopa - that's really nice -- Aggie has beautiful eyes, and you captured them well
Talys said:@Orangutan - Well, like I said, I certainly don't give a camera a minus because it has a feature I don't use. If VF histograms or zebras help with shots like the one that you took above and that's the way you like to shoot - of course, have at it - I'm happy you have the tool!
For me, I guess shooting film cameras for a couple of decades made exposure second nature, because I didn't have a choice then but to learn to get it right back then. I'm not saying that we should live in the past and deprive ourselves of tools that we have today, but it's not like those skills go away, either, and I find extra clutter -- especially in the viewfinder -- distracting, and of no real benefit to my finished product. It was also not really that painful to learn, and rather satisfying to see the improvement.
dlee13 said:Considering that it's the same sensor as the A7RII, is it the firmware that allows for more dynamic range?
dlee13 said:Considering that it's the same sensor as the A7RII, is it the firmware that allows for more dynamic range?
Dylan777 said:For me, I use EVF as a gate keeper. It's almost impossible not to adjust the exp. when my eyes see extreme highly/shadow through EVF.
Have a great sunday everyone.
bwud said:Dylan777 said:For me, I use EVF as a gate keeper. It's almost impossible not to adjust the exp. when my eyes see extreme highly/shadow through EVF.
Have a great sunday everyone.
I like it sometimes. Switching between exposure preview and whatever it decides to show in non-exposure preview (seriously I have no idea other than some random combo of settings the light meter thinks is natural) is one thing I hope to be able to either map to or set with the C-modes. I'm down to about 3 things I have to access the menus for. Fewer is better.
Dylan777 said:bwud said:Dylan777 said:For me, I use EVF as a gate keeper. It's almost impossible not to adjust the exp. when my eyes see extreme highly/shadow through EVF.
Have a great sunday everyone.
I like it sometimes. Switching between exposure preview and whatever it decides to show in non-exposure preview (seriously I have no idea other than some random combo of settings the light meter thinks is natural) is one thing I hope to be able to either map to or set with the C-modes. I'm down to about 3 things I have to access the menus for. Fewer is better.
Hope everything goes well bwud, haven't chat with you for awhile.
"It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle" than me buying into another FF DSLR system. I'm looking forward to see more FF mirroless systems from big players. Until then, A9 is pretty much has everything I need and want from mirrorless. My simple wish for upcoming a7s III to have similar specs, Eye-AF, fps and AF points as a7r III. If yes....will pre-order it to pair up with my A9.
Have a geat Sunday
SecureGSM said:no, no more dynamic range. the rest is a Sony Marketing Department trickery, wizardry, black magic whatever
http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%205D%20Mark%20IV,Sony%20ILCE-7RM2,Sony%20ILCE-7RM3
... To summarize it in a number at base ISO: 13.6 EV at the pixel, or for a 42.4MP file. Or 14.8 EV if you like to compare to DXO numbers (and only generate 8MP images from your 42.4MP camera) ...
[quote author='I am unbiased' Rishi]neuroanatomist said:[quote author='I am unbiased' Rishi]
To summarize it in a number at base ISO: 13.6 EV at the pixel, or for a 42.4MP file.