Eli said:I don't understand why people take HDR photos just for the sake of it being "HDR". Good composition leads to a more striking image than having bad composition and high dynamic range.
Agreed, And it seems like it would be the combination of the two that would make the best sense... Why shoot something as HDR, if there is no composition? Why shoot any photo with no composition?infared said:Eli said:I don't understand why people take HDR photos just for the sake of it being "HDR". Good composition leads to a more striking image than having bad composition and high dynamic range.
I agree, whole-heartedly. It is a great tool to expand tonal range if used "tastefully"!
Eli said:I don't understand why people take HDR photos just for the sake of it being "HDR". Good composition leads to a more striking image than having bad composition and high dynamic range.
infared said:I agree, whole-heartedly. It is a great tool to expand tonal range if used "tastefully"!
Krob78 said:Agreed, And it seems like it would be the combination of the two that would make the best sense... Why shoot something as HDR, if there is no composition? Why shoot any photo with no composition?
serendipidy said:+1....Photography is an art form...beauty is in the eye of the beholder 8)
I don't understand why Picasso painted distorted people or Monet painted pastel blotchy pictures.
I don't understand who would pay $86.9 million USD for what looks like a 1st grader art class.
Orange, Red, Yellow (1961) By Mark Rothko. $86.9 million (2012) Christie's New York
hrjoe said:@serendipidy & blaydese, thanks.
Here is my other shot at Belitung Island, Indonesia
blaydese said: