R1-7D said:scyrene said:R1-7D said:Gentlemen, it's not the spots that concern me on the sensor. It's the "brush-like" marks on the sensor that I am worried about, as I have never seen anything like that before.
It's an $8000 camera here in Canada, and I have had it a month. I'm concerned there's damage that was not caused by me.
The lines also do appear in my photographs. I noticed this from macro shots at f/20. It's just at f/32 they are more prounced, and I used the Dehaze function to show what I'm talking about as it exaggerates every spot. Dehaze is only to draw attention to the area.
I agree with others, if it's bothering you, contact Canon for possible cleaning/repairs/replacement.
Mind if I ask though, why macro at f/20? The diffraction softness must be pretty punishing at that point.
scyrene,
I did send it to Canon; they replaced the whole sensor and acknowledged there was an issue. I had also seen the same markings on several other 1DX Mark II units, including the one Canon sent me as a loaner while mine was in for repair.
In some situations, where I don't have a tripod, and can't later stack multiple shots, and I want as much depth of field as possible, a narrow aperture is the only way to go. Also, just to point out, if you read the whole thread, the issue was persistent even at f/11, which is quite a commonly used aperture.
Now the camera is back with a brand new sensor, it seems to be working very well, knock on wood.![]()
I should have read to the end, sorry
f/11 is more understandable. I'm a lot more averse to diffraction, perhaps, on the 5D3 I rarely went beyond f/10, and on the 5Ds I try to stick below f/8. Focus stacking is almost always better imho. Not to mention backgrounds.
Anyway it's good they sorted it
Upvote
0