And why is so?You do not need the adapter LM-> RF, you need adapters FD/FL/M42/R--> FE
And why is so?You do not need the adapter LM-> RF, you need adapters FD/FL/M42/R--> FE
the original EF -> RF adapter and manual lens adapters are more reliable design.And why is so?![]()
I know. The FD-RF adapter.You do not need the adapter LM-> RF, you need adapters FD/FL/M42/R--> FE
correct. but you said : " You do not need the adapter LM-> RF, you need adapters FD/FL/M42/R--> FE "the original EF -> RF adapter and manual lens adapters are more reliable design.
Believe me (;
OkLM, not EF. and why to FE? FE is SONY.. Did you mean LTM (Leica M39) instead of LM?
I wonder if you had a chance to test some vintage M42 and Contax mount Russian glass on R? i.e.: Helios 44-2, 40-2, 103, Jupiter, 8, 12? LTM mount lenses unfortunately are not amazing in extreme corners on FF mirrorless. I have a massive collection of vintage film cameras and lenses, hence my questionOk
EF - Canon
LM - Leica M