Show your Bird Portraits

For the Florida trip, I used the 200-800 on Friday and the 500 f/4 II on Saturday. Somewhat intentional to give each an extended try but also there were heavy clouds/rain on Saturday so I wanted the extra aperture.

I bought the RF 200-800 with a very specific use in mind where I did not like my options, photographing birds from a kayak. I do this several times each summer. The 100-400 was too short, the 500 II plus 1.4tc is more than a bit awkward to handle in a kayak. So, I am really excited about using the 200-800 for that purpose, I think it will be great.

Other than that, the 500 II is just better and I'll use it whenever it makes sense. I have always loved the way it renders images plus the AF is way more accurate and consistent. For walks in the park, more casual shooting, when size/weight are issues (like traveling or from a kayak), or when I expect to need a zoom, I'll go to the RF 200-800 or EF 100-400 II (until I replace it, then RF 100-500). All great lenses, it is just that the EF 500 II is better.

Nice position to be in, but I have options...good options.
...why I read CR.

Thanks for posting.
 
Upvote 0
And the opposite - a rather drab Green Sandpiper. These small birds pass through South-East England on their way from Scandinavia to Africa, and fatten up here. As above, a crop.

309A2623-DxO_Green_sandpiper-ls-s.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
Upvote 0