Alan, ISv very nice pictures.
Alan and others just a thought about D500 500PF combination. This is 500mm but at 20Mp
D500 is 20Mp and EOS 90D is 32.5. SQR(32.5/20) = 1.2747 So a 90D with a 400mm combo is effectively 400*1.2747=509mm equivalent only with smaller pixels which is a minus but at f/4 (if we are talking about the 400DOII) which is a plus.
And assuming we encounter the help of DXO ofcourse.
This situation reminded me of a very funny/cute metric that was invented by a forum member:
Pixels per duck! Funny but this isn't this our target when we seek more megapixels and bigger lenses? As many pixels as possibly on our photo target.
Alan and others just a thought about D500 500PF combination. This is 500mm but at 20Mp
D500 is 20Mp and EOS 90D is 32.5. SQR(32.5/20) = 1.2747 So a 90D with a 400mm combo is effectively 400*1.2747=509mm equivalent only with smaller pixels which is a minus but at f/4 (if we are talking about the 400DOII) which is a plus.
And assuming we encounter the help of DXO ofcourse.
This situation reminded me of a very funny/cute metric that was invented by a forum member:
Pixels per duck! Funny but this isn't this our target when we seek more megapixels and bigger lenses? As many pixels as possibly on our photo target.
Upvote
0