Show your Bird Portraits

Not as nice as Alan's, but here are a few we got a few years back. Funny thing is we aren't supposed to get these little guys in my part of the world either, but there he was. A guy actually argued with me about it. When I showed him the photos he told me that I didn't take them where I said I did.

People are amazing.

IMG_8692_tiff-studio.jpg

IMG_8694_tiff-studio.jpg

IMG_8696_tiff-studio.jpg

IMG_8698_tiff-studio.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 users
Upvote 0
Not as nice as Alan's, but here are a few we got a few years back. Funny thing is we aren't supposed to get these little guys in my part of the world either, but there he was. A guy actually argued with me about it. When I showed him the photos he told me that I didn't take them where I said I did.

People are amazing.

View attachment 193480

View attachment 193481

View attachment 193482

View attachment 193483
They are amazing. It’s remarkable how some will never back down. Anyway, owls are great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Shorebird standing on the ice of local reservoir, October 23rd. Possibly a greater yellowlegs but I'm no avian authority. I know there are occasions when this species may migrate south as late as October or even November.

7DMII + Sigma 150-600mm C zoomed out to 600mm. It was quite some distance from me so I had to crop in a lot.

_36A2102_DxO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
Upvote 0
R5 + 100-400mm II set at 371mm (don't make that mistake on a prime). The first is my favourite pose for a Nuthatch, looking down, at iso5000. The second, looking up is at iso8000. Both are rather cropped. Processed in DxO PL4 - DeepPRIME required for these.

309A3844-DxO_Nuthatch_iso5000.jpg309A3989-DxO_nuthatch_iso8000-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users
Upvote 0
R5 + 100-400mm II set at 371mm (don't make that mistake on a prime). The first is my favourite pose for a Nuthatch, looking down, at iso5000. The second, looking up is at iso8000. Both are rather cropped. Processed in DxO PL4 - DeepPRIME required for these.

View attachment 193607View attachment 193608
Hadn't read and said to myself, they should be better but now I understand.

Jack
 
Upvote 0