Tokyo was not, and still is not, in the USA.
99.9%?Tokyo was not, and still is not, in the USA.
Worldwide I'd believe the number more varied. Sony seems to have a bigger hold in the EU just based on my limited travels. But at USA events I do tend to see a massive majority of Canon.
Brian
I live in the USA (near NY) and I see all sorts of cameras.
)
So, 85%. If you use the rounding rules followed by @Michael Clark, meaning you round to a common full frame focal length, up or down as you choose.
99.9% is a North Korean voting result.So, 85%. If you use the rounding rules followed by @Michael Clark, meaning you round to a common full frame focal length, up or down as you choose.
Canon G12, G3X, G7X G5X. OK I jest, using a Sony sensor is hardly 0.1%, but what I found interesting at the time is that Canon’s implementation of the Sony BSI sensor was more efficient that all the other makes that used the same sensor in their products, including Sony.
I see a surprising number of Z8/Z9 with the 800/6.3 lens but very few Sonys locally in the UK - I recall only one 200-600 and have never seen one of their big whites. The Zuiko 150-600mm has had a very poor review (it's a rebranded Sigma with a huge mark up). The Nikon 600/6.3 looks to me a better bet than the 800 - it seems to be sharper in several tests and is very light as well as being much smaller than the 800/6.3. Canon is by far the most popular with birders here. Haven't come across in person another 200-800 yet but friends have them on order.
As if a "perfect" 50/1.8 matters so much that it becomes a criticism for RF.
It will be disappointing if Z6iii can't triumph R6ii. Zf is a sign that Z6iii can't really beat R6ii on paper but msrp instead.
You are a bit delusional right. RF28 pancake, 200-800, R8 from last year was decent offering. R6ii was a rapid upgrade.
