Now if he could just find a photographer.
Photographers arent in here always wanting something that will be released tomorrow, they're out shooting today.
Upvote
0
Now if he could just find a photographer.
Exactly. I keep reading that canon has no pro body to go with the pro lenses. But unless you are shooting weddings (and need two cars slots) or shooting mainly sports the R is a pro camera. Or are those the only two pro genres now? Cause studio, portraits, fashion, landscape, baby, maternity/pregnancy etc etc, the R can do all of those without issue.
There was a time that people were saying that the A7II and the A7RII could be used professionally... and the R is a step above both of those (except when it comes to MP compared to the R).
And the 70-200! How heavy? filter size? length? I'd love to stand it upright in a case...I can’t wait for more info on the 15-35.
Some people who don't know any better will put them on an R or even an RP. They might not even upgrade if and when a camera of the same level comes along, whatever that means. Either the chicken or the egg has to come first.
What is "same level"? Eos R is almost mirrorless 5D IV and it even has some advantages (like zero AF error).And yet there is no camera of the same level to put them on...
Just because you can afford to shell out for the best lenses AND the best camera doesn’t mean we all can.Some people who don't know any better will put them on an R or even an RP. They might not even upgrade if and when a camera of the same level comes along, whatever that means. Either the chicken or the egg has to come first.
I dare say no serious professional is making such silly claims. The EOS R is a pro level body (unless we only consider weapons like the 1DX2 as "Pro"). The 5D bodies are THE overwhelming choice for actual, full time professionals. And the EOS R is quite evidently a MILC version of the 5D4, right down to the sensor and magnesium body, plus a newer CPU. The sole sticking point seems to be lack of a second slot. Ok. I get it...
I really would love to see a legitimate survey of actual professionals who routinely use dual card slots. I have the strong suspicion that it is a little like AFMA. Something that most pros admit they should probably do, but few ever take the time to do it.
Except that dual slots don't cost time. One card just stays nearly permanent in the camera.I really would love to see a legitimate survey of actual professionals who routinely use dual card slots. I have the strong suspicion that it is a little like AFMA. Something that most pros admit they should probably do, but few ever take the time to do it.
You know, in 10 years professional shooting (architecture) I've never once had a card failure. I have had a circuit board replaced and a T-S mechanism, but that's it. I'm using a one-card R now all the time, my 5Div gathers dust as a back-up now. Maybe I should be losing sleep. I am probably going to start using an iPad and Canon Connect, but mainly so clients can 'look over my shoulder' without bumping the tripod.Well, as has already been pointed out, there is that card slot issue.
Blasphemy! You cant have an f4 in there!! Bring out the Spanish Inquisition!
You know, in 10 years professional shooting (architecture) I've never once had a card failure. I have had a circuit board replaced and a T-S mechanism, but that's it. I'm using a one-card R now all the time, my 5Div gathers dust as a back-up now. Maybe I should be losing sleep. I am probably going to start using an iPad and Canon Connect, but mainly so clients can 'look over my shoulder' without bumping the tripod.
And yet there is no camera of the same level to put them on...