What is your Canon wish list ?

[coldmist]

EF 50mm f1.4~2 IS ring-type USM non-L

EF 85mm f1.8~2 IS ring-type USM non-L - More usable wide-open with less chromatic aberration than the current 85 1.8.

 

[bergstrom]

I want a more reasonably priced HSS speedlite, a canon 600 ex rt for only $200.

 

[ajfotofilmagem]

I want a more reasonably priced HSS speedlite, a canon 600 ex rt for only $200.

I wish a 430EX III with AF assist beam capable of filling the out-of-center focus points, and compatible with the external battery pack.
It could cost $ 350.

 

[wldbil]

an affordable Zoom 35 - 85 mm f/4 IS

 

[Antono Refa]

Camera wise:

2) AF point linked AE. The EOS 3 had it. The Powershot G series has it. It would be nice if the 5DmkV had it.

The 5DmkIV doesn't have it? My 80D has it, so that is quite baffling.

My understanding of the 5DmkIV manual is:

1) Per page 254, "spot metering covers approx 1.3% of the viewfinger area at the center".

2) Page 259 says all metering modes have AE lock applied at the center AF point, except evaluative, which has AE lock applied at the AF point that achieved focus. My understanding of page 253 is evaluative metering covers most of the frame.

My expectation is if the camera could perform spot AE at the AF point, the manual would say so explicitly, so I assume it doesn't.

3) The manual suggests locking AE at the center point and recomposing. It's all good, I still wish it would spot AE at the focus point and skip the recompose.

 

[slclick]

I'd sell my Pen F if Canon would make the M5 with a flip screen as opposed to a tilt. Throw in actual dslr menus instead of Powershot and I'd take a loss.

 

[KeithBreazeal]

After using the M5 for a while, I would really like to see a FF mirrorless built with the 5D IV body design.
I could see a "5M" model name. An electronic shutter with at least 10 fps would be a good starting point.

 

[Viggo]

How about they just start shipping the 85 IS :

 

[RobbieHat]

My only need now and forever is..
5DSR Mark II..
Same pixel or 64M Pixel(80d equalent)
13.5 DR
7 FPS
4k video. With DPAF
wifi
0.5-1 stop İso advantage over 5dsr

Also revised 16-35 f4 is(lighter and better optics)

Why settle for 13.5 DR? I want 14.5 to 14.8 and think we should expect it. The sensor capability has been out there for 5 years. Why should we have to settle for less.

I also want at least 1 stop improvement in ISO if not more. I want less noise at higher ISOs so that I can get more usable images in low light with wildlife and much less grain in my night shots.

I think Canon users need to demand that Canon's sensor technology improve or they will see more of us walk and fewer new users being added in the coming years.

Time for them to step up on the 5DSRII and 7DIII.

 

[Azathoth]

Some plane tickets so that i can travel around the world.

Thanks Canon.

 

[SkynetTX]

1., Canon EOS 9000D

18 MP APS-C sensor
1 680 000 pixel LCD screen
25 AutoFocus points (16 + 8 + 1 in the center)
No Video Mode, No WiFi, No Bluetooth, No NFC (!!)
ISO range: 100 - 1600
Dimensions: 129,6 * 99,7 * 77,9 mm
Battery Life: 700+ shots
Same look of the back and top panels like of the 1200D.

2., Canon EF-S 250mm f/5.6 IS USM Macro

1:1 Magnification ratio
75 cm Minimum Focusing Distance
Image Stabilization
25 mm wide Focusing ring
No DOF marks, just mechanical distance window like of the EF-S 60mm.

3. Canon PowerShot SX9000 HS
18 MP sensor (the largest possible)
20-600 mm f/2.8-5.6 lens
Depth: 32 mm max(!)

 

[Deleted member 379512]

My only need now and forever is..
5DSR Mark II..
Same pixel or 64M Pixel(80d equalent)
13.5 DR
7 FPS
4k video. With DPAF
wifi
0.5-1 stop İso advantage over 5dsr

Also revised 16-35 f4 is(lighter and better optics)

Why settle for 13.5 DR? I want 14.5 to 14.8 and think we should expect it. The sensor capability has been out there for 5 years. Why should we have to settle for less.

I also want at least 1 stop improvement in ISO if not more. I want less noise at higher ISOs so that I can get more usable images in low light with wildlife and much less grain in my night shots.

I think Canon users need to demand that Canon's sensor technology improve or they will see more of us walk and fewer new users being added in the coming years.

Time for them to step up on the 5DSRII and 7DIII.

Exactly, I wonder if this is how we got the 6dmk2 - I saw a fair amount of comments saying that it would be perfect if it just had a better af system and flip screen, and that's exactly what we got. Nothing more

I think Canon should really pull out the stops for the next one, and try for as many fps (I.e 10) that can be wrung out of the camera, exceed the iso of the 5dmk4 by as much as possible, hopefully as close to a stop and try for a lower native iso to bring out as much dr.

There are some really nice things about Canon cameras, so I'd love to see them try and beat the competition in the areaa where they are behind and give us a all in one model.

A smaller bitrate 4k as an option alongside the mjpeg tile to down nicely too. The af for video is great, could be a really good selling point if they threw in some of video features to match it

Just my wishlist

 

[Jopa]

My only need now and forever is..
5DSR Mark II..
Same pixel or 64M Pixel(80d equalent)
13.5 DR
7 FPS
4k video. With DPAF
wifi
0.5-1 stop İso advantage over 5dsr

Also revised 16-35 f4 is(lighter and better optics)

Why settle for 13.5 DR? I want 14.5 to 14.8 and think we should expect it. The sensor capability has been out there for 5 years. Why should we have to settle for less.

I also want at least 1 stop improvement in ISO if not more. I want less noise at higher ISOs so that I can get more usable images in low light with wildlife and much less grain in my night shots.

I think Canon users need to demand that Canon's sensor technology improve or they will see more of us walk and fewer new users being added in the coming years.

Time for them to step up on the 5DSRII and 7DIII.

A 100MPx MF Phase 1 IQ3 has PDR 13.06 which is a LOT compared even to the D850. While I don't mind the 5DsR 2 have 13.5 (which is highly unlikely), I think 14.5 is simply unrealistic.

http://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm

Camera Model Maximum PDR ▴ Low Light ISO Low Light EV
Phase One IQ3 100MP 13.06 12800 12.00
Hasselblad H6D-50c 12.01 6400 11.00
Hasselblad X1D-50c 11.98 9058 11.50
Phase One IQ250 11.92 6400 11.00
FujiFilm GFX 50S 11.90 7853 11.30
Pentax 645Z 11.77 5157 10.69
Sony ILCE-7R 11.71 4108 10.36
Nikon D850 11.63 4115 10.36
Nikon D610 11.61 3969 10.31
Nikon D810 11.60 3439 10.10
Nikon D750 11.49 4075 10.35

 

[chrysoberyl]

Intriguing. Add a throw of 270 degrees or so and I am interested. It would be good for stationary wildlife and wildflowers, and probably not too heavy for hiking.

2., Canon EF-S 250mm f/5.6 IS USM Macro

1:1 Magnification ratio
75 cm Minimum Focusing Distance
Image Stabilization
25 mm wide Focusing ring
No DOF marks, just mechanical distance window like of the EF-S 60mm.

 

[dolina]

A better spec'd full frame body than those of Sony. ;D

 

[jayphotoworks]

It would be nice to see an introduction of a new class of L lenses that are either primes or constant aperture zooms that employ the newest Nano USM technology for quick stills AF operation, while being quiet enough for video operation with silent focusing and silent and smooth aperture changes.

 

[YuengLinger]

World peace!

 

[Jopa]

More pandas.

 

[slclick]

A true EF-M prime trinity. (two to go)

 

[KevinP]

More disposable income. An upgrade from SL1 to get better autofocus and a newer generation sensor.

High spec cameras in middle size. I like the M5 or 80D feature sets, but I want a native EF/EF-S mount and no larger than T7i/77D size. The 80D feels over-large to me, with not guitar length fingers. It seems silly that a FF Sony seems easier to hold.

Blend the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 and the Canon 15-85 f3.5-5.6 together so I don't have to choose: 15-85 f2.8 with IS/OS/VC and great image quality. Weather seal to make it the best general use EF-S lens for 80D. Easy to pair with a FF 70-200, 70-300, or 100-400.

2 hole battery charger.