What would you do? Crop or FF

Status
Not open for further replies.
verysimplejason said:
It's not how many AF points you put but how sensitive they are. As only the center one is a cross-point, I can only hope for the better for the other AF points.

Actually, for tracking moving subjects, a lot of it is how many there are, and the more of them, the more densely spaced, the better.
 
Upvote 0
MichaelHodges said:
I've been contemplating swapping out my 7D for this 6D or the 5D III. I had two reservations:

1. Low ISO dynamic range versus the latest Nikon offerings
2. Auto focus

I'm not really keen on in-camera jpegs at high ISO, but rather taking a look at the RAW file.


http://michaelhodgesfiction.com/

Whenever you consider Nikon, you would also have to ask yourself... How much do I lose when I sell the glass I own and replace it with Nikon compatible lenses? Is it ok with my wallet? You can do a lot of other things with that money I bet, a good strobist equipment or a new lens. How comfortable am I with the ergonomics and controls of Nikon?
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
verysimplejason said:
It's not how many AF points you put but how sensitive they are. As only the center one is a cross-point, I can only hope for the better for the other AF points.

Actually, for tracking moving subjects, a lot of it is how many there are, and the more of them, the more densely spaced, the better.

Correct but I'm just hoping for a few very good points in 6D since it's already advertised that it'll only have that many AF points. That said, I'd rather have few good points than many but isn't sensitive enough.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.