Lensrentals.com has posted their first in a series of MTF charts for Canon lenses, I imagine they'll post other brand MTF charts as well. The first release is for Canon prime lenses, excluding tilt-shift lenses, those will be done in a separate article.
Roger explains the methodology of the testing:
This is the first post of a series of posts publishing all of our MTF results so that methodology is consistent, easy to find, and up-to-date. (For some of the older lenses there are graphs done with older software floating around. For a couple of lenses, there are incorrect graphs done before we worked out all of the details for sensor glass in the testing pathway. These are all current.)
Otherwise, there are no comparisons, no commentary, just the test results for you to use and abuse as you see fit. The major purpose is just to get these MTF charts organized and in one place where you can find them.
Just to avoid 4,200 comments: these are all average MTFs from multiple copies. They are all measured at the widest aperture. Yes, I know you’d like several apertures. I haven’t got the time or money to do that. Sorry. Check out the full article and MTF charts.
image credit // Lensrentals.com
Yes, beaten by the Sigma 135mm 1.8 at a third of a stop faster. But keep handing-over your $1000 to Canon.
Right-hand section of top chart only, to compare to the Canon:
I admit to being surprised that the 135mm f2 held up so well, given my experience of it. But still no defence for continuing to churn-out a 30-year-old lens.
The 30 year old veteran has no problems... :ROFLMAO:
I'll just wait for the RF 1,4/135 , which won't have any focusing issues, and, in the meantime, enjoy my excellent 30 year-old veteran...whithout any focusing issues.
only if you use 60 year old focusing technics in your DSLR.
try a mirrorless and you will not have AF isses with sigma lenses......
The Canon doesn't!
"I dont photograph charts" is a beautiful response also =)
My surprise from the charts is the 40F2.8. For the size and cost of the lens, that's incredible!
Higher is better, the resolution goes from the center of the lens on the left to the outside edge on the right. Macro lenses and copy lenses want a flat line, for portraits, many want the center sharp and the edges softer.
I don't care about that Sigma, or any Sigma. I said that the old 135/2L is fabulous according to the chart. And in real life too.
Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM Lens Average MTF
Stopped down data for the 24 mm L II but not the 50 mm L. Also, some of the Sigma data seems to be missing.
Just trying to see if there is a useful link where I can use the data for apples to apples comparisons.