Canon News has uncovered a patent that shows Canon is working on small RF prime lenses, like non-L.
Japan patent 2019-152683 does include the RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro in one of the embodiments, but keep in mind that lens design can sometimes build off of existing lenses.
RF prime lens optical formulas in this patent:
- Canon RF 20mm f/2 (Lens length of 70mm)
- Canon RF 35mm f/2.8 (Lens length of 40mm)
- Canon RF 45mm f/2.8 (Lens length of 43mm)
- Canon RF 35mm f/2 (Lens length of 30mm)
Beyond the prime lenses, there is also a wide-angle f/4 zoom included.
- Canon RF 16-35mm f/4 (Lens length 90mm – 97mm)
Looking at all the embodiments, I think only the RF 16-35mm f/4 could realistically be coming.
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
I would be surprised if Canon did not release a 20mm lens in the RF mount.
Canon if you are reading this, where's the f/4 trinity?
I know that they're working on the high-end first, but us regular people need lenses too. Although I have no problem adapting my EF lenses to the RP.
With Nikon having the F4's already done, you can bet Canon won't be too far behind.
I'd have thought that the 35mm f2 IS is a pretty liked and fairly reasonably priced lens. The 24mm f2.8 IS and 28mm f2.8 IS are more difficult to justify.
The f/4 trinity is a much better fit for the R and the RP. I hope that we'll see it soon.
Now I shoot a Voigtlander 21/4 Skopar until I find a good Leica 21mm that is not over-priced.
The RF 35 1.8 STM is variable in length because of macro. I dislike this very much, and this is the main reason for switching NOT to RF. One lens I would use native (the 35 of course!) and the rest I can adapt easily. But I don't ever buy this current 35 STM.
My hopes for a similar 35 IS was not very high. They probably bring a L with 1.4 or 1.2, which is 800gr and 1500€ or more... (see the current 85). They might be superb, but I like the handy smaller ones.
So maybe they really announce some more smaller effective prime lenses... I can't understand the differences in length on different f-stops (maybe the numbers are switched?), because a f/2.8 should be tinyer than a f/2 ?!
And no, the Sigma might not be that cheap overall.
Bring it on the table. :cool:
I agree that most people prefer zooms and with the optical quality of modern zooms you aren't really giving up much, if you don't need a fast lens. These primes may not be big sellers, but they are a nice, reliable stable product the rarely needs updating. I would agree that Canon may view them as a small, but reliable source of income and I suspect that if they mirror the EF versions they probably won't require much additional investment by Canon.